You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Sir Keir Starmer
April 19 2024 12.26pm

Sir Keir Starmer

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 36 of 65 < 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 >

 

View Matov's Profile Matov Flag 19 Apr 21 8.36pm Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by Tom-the-eagle

It’s funny, I’m generally, (although not exclusively) Right leaning, however I like the fact he doesn’t constantly attack the government. To me it comes across quite classy.

Whilst not my cup of tea, I think he’s fairly credible.

Edited by Tom-the-eagle (19 Apr 2021 7.27pm)

Problem for Starmer is that given the scale of the national crisis, it leaves little room for traditional style opposition so he is playing it pretty much right in terms of generally not appearing too critical.

But he is not credible but for me that reflects a wider problem for Labour as a whole. Since 2015 they have lost Scotland and now have lost a huge swathe of seats in their traditional heartlands.

Brexit has potentially destroyed them as a functioning party with Starmer and his disastrous charge for a second referendum at the very heart of that. Even since 2016 the vast majority of the activists on the left have been slagging off the very people they need to vote for them. They simply do not have the collective intellectual bandwidth to comprehend how out of touch they are.

Ever since the 2015 election Labour have been on their knees with only the Corbyn led 2017 surge by way of halting that. Brexit, European Elections, local elections and then the 2019 GE have been disaster after disaster.

What can Labour offer anybody now? Its membership and activist base are fundamentally lunatics with all this trans BS and desire for open borders (lets not forget that Labours official policy in 2019 was not only to protect freedom of movement but widen it).

They are utterly f***ed. And with boundary changes due to come into effect before 2024, then it moves into the realms of asking what is the point of them anymore?

And outside of Starmer who is there? Andy Burnham is the only possible leader I can see having even a chance of turning the tide and he is not even in the PLP. Labour will not achieve a working majority in this decade and if they don't watch it, they might even cease to exist.

Identity Dogma has destroyed them and yet still they cheer it on.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jeeagles Flag 19 Apr 21 8.45pm

Originally posted by cryrst

So take brexit out of it and what should he oppose or propose?
Are there Any changes that could be made atm which would make it better for the majority of uk citizens. Thats the numbers game of politics.

Most opposition leaders keep a low profile until a couple of years before an election. Cameron and Millerband both had slow starts.

In fairness to him, its difficult to judge his effectiveness, and he's had to pick up a s***show.

It must be difficult to come up with a policy, when half the party seems solely motivated by running round shouting Tory Scum at the majority of the electorate.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Matov's Profile Matov Flag 19 Apr 21 8.51pm Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by jeeagles


It must be difficult to come up with a policy, when half the party seems solely motivated by running round shouting Tory Scum at the majority of the electorate.


The Left are trapped in a purity spiral and they love it. I genuinely believe that many of them are happier not being in Government but believing themselves to hold the moral high-ground. Losing elections is always the fault of the electorate rather than them.

You just have to see their reaction to a statement such as 'British jobs for British workers'. They simply cannot bring themselves to even say it, let alone promote such a notion.


 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View timmyb's Profile timmyb Flag Banstead 19 Apr 21 9.06pm Send a Private Message to timmyb Add timmyb as a friend

Originally posted by Matov


The Left are trapped in a purity spiral and they love it. I genuinely believe that many of them are happier not being in Government but believing themselves to hold the moral high-ground. Losing elections is always the fault of the electorate rather than them.

You just have to see their reaction to a statement such as 'British jobs for British workers'. They simply cannot bring themselves to even say it, let alone promote such a notion.


It was Gordon Brown who actually coined this at one point, wasn't it?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Matov's Profile Matov Flag 19 Apr 21 9.38pm Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by timmyb

It was Gordon Brown who actually coined this at one point, wasn't it?

It was pretty much a staple of old Labour for decades. And yes, Brown did attempt to resurrect it but I believe, and am happy to be corrected on this, it soon faded although I believe even Cameron jumped on the bandwagon, slating him for using it which tells you a lot about modern Conservatism.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HKOwen's Profile HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 20 Apr 21 2.35am Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Love the Starmer, full steam ahead

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Jacey's Profile Jacey Flag 20 Apr 21 10.02am Send a Private Message to Jacey Add Jacey as a friend

Originally posted by HKOwen

Love the Starmer, full steam ahead

With Starmer backed by shadow chancellor,that dreary, dreadful,dopey Annelise Dodds,should keep Boris in charge for many,many years.

Edited by Jacey (20 Apr 2021 10.14am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Matov's Profile Matov Flag 20 Apr 21 10.18am Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by Jacey

With Starmer backed by shadow chancellor,that dreadful,dopey Annelise, should keep Boris in charge for many,many years.


And that is the deeper structural issue for Labour. Who else is there to lead it at the moment?

Every one of its MP's are so wedded to lunacies such as identity politics and/or Remaining in the EU and/or being closely associated with the Corbyn project that they are, by and large, utterly toxic non-entities. I cannot think of a single, credible, sitting Labour MP who you can look at and think they would be a better option than Starmer.

Out of his rivals for the leadership, the only one that I ever rated was Lisa Nandy and even then, she has not set the world alight since Starmer won but at least she saw the iceberg Labour was sailing into, guided by one Sir Kier Starmer, prior to December 2019. Deserves a modicum of respect for that.

But otherwise?

Andy Burnham is literally the only Labour public figure I can think of who might be able to achieve something.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HKOwen's Profile HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 20 Apr 21 11.50am Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Add in the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Nandy Pandy and the anti semites still hanging around like Burgon and Long-Bailey and they are fooked. Most constituencies still with a Labour MP would vote in a dog turd if you put a red rosette on it.........come to think of it


Originally posted by Jacey

With Starmer backed by shadow chancellor,that dreary, dreadful,dopey Annelise Dodds,should keep Boris in charge for many,many years.

Edited by Jacey (20 Apr 2021 10.14am)

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HKOwen's Profile HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 20 Apr 21 11.52am Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Burnham is another who is all hindsight .
Let's see some McCluskey comments from Labour

Originally posted by Matov


And that is the deeper structural issue for Labour. Who else is there to lead it at the moment?

Every one of its MP's are so wedded to lunacies such as identity politics and/or Remaining in the EU and/or being closely associated with the Corbyn project that they are, by and large, utterly toxic non-entities. I cannot think of a single, credible, sitting Labour MP who you can look at and think they would be a better option than Starmer.

Out of his rivals for the leadership, the only one that I ever rated was Lisa Nandy and even then, she has not set the world alight since Starmer won but at least she saw the iceberg Labour was sailing into, guided by one Sir Kier Starmer, prior to December 2019. Deserves a modicum of respect for that.

But otherwise?

Andy Burnham is literally the only Labour public figure I can think of who might be able to achieve something.

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View silvertop's Profile silvertop Flag Portishead 20 Apr 21 4.42pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by Matov


And that is the deeper structural issue for Labour. Who else is there to lead it at the moment?

Every one of its MP's are so wedded to lunacies such as identity politics and/or Remaining in the EU and/or being closely associated with the Corbyn project that they are, by and large, utterly toxic non-entities. I cannot think of a single, credible, sitting Labour MP who you can look at and think they would be a better option than Starmer.

Out of his rivals for the leadership, the only one that I ever rated was Lisa Nandy and even then, she has not set the world alight since Starmer won but at least she saw the iceberg Labour was sailing into, guided by one Sir Kier Starmer, prior to December 2019. Deserves a modicum of respect for that.

But otherwise?

Andy Burnham is literally the only Labour public figure I can think of who might be able to achieve something.

Dan Jarvis? I'd vote for him and I never vote Labour.

BTW, the pub landlord was of the Raven. Lovely boozer. Sadly, suspect he is a Corbynista.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View silvertop's Profile silvertop Flag Portishead 20 Apr 21 4.49pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by Matov

Problem for Starmer is that given the scale of the national crisis, it leaves little room for traditional style opposition so he is playing it pretty much right in terms of generally not appearing too critical.

But he is not credible but for me that reflects a wider problem for Labour as a whole. Since 2015 they have lost Scotland and now have lost a huge swathe of seats in their traditional heartlands.

Brexit has potentially destroyed them as a functioning party with Starmer and his disastrous charge for a second referendum at the very heart of that. Even since 2016 the vast majority of the activists on the left have been slagging off the very people they need to vote for them. They simply do not have the collective intellectual bandwidth to comprehend how out of touch they are.

Ever since the 2015 election Labour have been on their knees with only the Corbyn led 2017 surge by way of halting that. Brexit, European Elections, local elections and then the 2019 GE have been disaster after disaster.

What can Labour offer anybody now? Its membership and activist base are fundamentally lunatics with all this trans BS and desire for open borders (lets not forget that Labours official policy in 2019 was not only to protect freedom of movement but widen it).

They are utterly f***ed. And with boundary changes due to come into effect before 2024, then it moves into the realms of asking what is the point of them anymore?

And outside of Starmer who is there? Andy Burnham is the only possible leader I can see having even a chance of turning the tide and he is not even in the PLP. Labour will not achieve a working majority in this decade and if they don't watch it, they might even cease to exist.

Identity Dogma has destroyed them and yet still they cheer it on.

Good post. And for those on the right (i.e. most posters on this site) do not cheer this possibility unless you believe in autocratic rule. A government without effective opposition lacks the checks and balances to govern in any semblance of a democratic way.

However, fear not. Even where opposition is rubbish, our system is such that all governments, no matter how entrenched, eventually tear themselves apart with power chasing, sleaze and endemic corruption.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 36 of 65 < 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Sir Keir Starmer