Most definitely. I think when push comes to shove, people would rather have the vaccine than the alternative.

Edited by BlueJay (31 Mar 2021 10.16pm)

You're right that there are definitely issues with contacting people. I've known a few people without mobiles, who essentially ended up missing out, and then on the call, and eventually received a letter weeks later. All of those who ('wisely') decide to get vaccinated will I'm sure eventually manage to book in or get called up, but missing out for a few weeks due to miscommunication or not having access to a smartphone will no doubt have unfortunate consequences for some.

That said all in all, the NHS and volunteers have more than done us proud and I class it as a great achievement for our nation that so many people have been vaccinated, and just as importantly so many are willing to be (despite the negative AZ coverage and the like).

I concur regarding the NHS/Volunteers and achievement.

Yup. Really well organised. But the Govt insisting booked second Pfizer jabs in February should be unbooked then rebooked later was deep folly.

That's great news on both counts.

There's nothing wise about accepting this treatment before it has finished its development trials. That's going to be in January 2023.
The emergency clause in the Coronavirus act 2020 that allows jabs to be carried out beforehand is the only reason they are already being rolled out.
Because all medical professionals have signed the oath, if you ask anyone of them "Is it safe?" they'll have to answer truthfully. And the truth is they don't know. Nobody does.
So anyone who's already had it, have taken part in a trial.
Anyone who hasn't yet should consider these two questions
1) Does it contain MRC-5 (aborted foetal tissue) ?
2)Is there a possibility of a latrogenic reaction? This is when multiple compounds contained in the "vaccine" react with each other. When inside human beings this has the potential to cause harm.
The answer to 1) is yes, it does.
And the answer to 2) is yes, there is.