Phil Spector

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 3 of 3 << First < 1 2 3

cantrbury eagle Canterbury 19 Jan 21 9.40pm
River deep mountain high just about pop perfection. Al Pacino made a very good Bio pick on the man very unflattering warts and all.
Alert a moderator to this post

cantrbury eagle

Canterbury 19 Jan 21 9.40pm

Send a Private Message to cantrbury eagle

River deep mountain high just about pop perfection. Al Pacino made a very good Bio pick on the man very unflattering warts and all.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 06 Feb 21 10.38am
I actually watched the Al Pacino Spector, and now I'm not convinced he did kill that woman. The physical evidence suggested in the film clearly indicates that he could not have killed her. Having that ridiculous wig probably didn't go down well with the jury.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

06 Feb 21 10.38am

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

I actually watched the Al Pacino Spector, and now I'm not convinced he did kill that woman. The physical evidence suggested in the film clearly indicates that he could not have killed her.
Having that ridiculous wig probably didn't go down well with the jury.

Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11 Beckenham 06 Feb 21 10.48am
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger I actually watched the Al Pacino Spector, and now I'm not convinced he did kill that woman. The physical evidence suggested in the film clearly indicates that he could not have killed her. Having that ridiculous wig probably didn't go down well with the jury. Not seen it but you should take Hollywood biopics and even documentaries with a pinch of salt. For every documentary that lead to a conviction being over turned there are plenty where authorities involved in the case point out that the film ignored evidence or put too much weight on a witness or even so what the jury heard all this and still found them guilty, nothing new etc. Spector was a rich man and so I assume could afford a decent team of lawyers he had his day in court and the jury decided he was guilty. One more point
Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11

Beckenham 06 Feb 21 10.48am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Not seen it but you should take Hollywood biopics and even documentaries with a pinch of salt.

For every documentary that lead to a conviction being over turned there are plenty where authorities involved in the case point out that the film ignored evidence or put too much weight on a witness or even so what the jury heard all this and still found them guilty, nothing new etc.

Spector was a rich man and so I assume could afford a decent team of lawyers he had his day in court and the jury decided he was guilty.

One more point

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 06 Feb 21 6.48pm
Originally posted by Badger11 Not seen it but you should take Hollywood biopics and even documentaries with a pinch of salt. For every documentary that lead to a conviction being over turned there are plenty where authorities involved in the case point out that the film ignored evidence or put too much weight on a witness or even so what the jury heard all this and still found them guilty, nothing new etc. Spector was a rich man and so I assume could afford a decent team of lawyers he had his day in court and the jury decided he was guilty. I understand that but it did make me question if he was jailed through his reputation and appearance and not the actual evidence. Would you trust a jury to acquit if you were innocent?
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

06 Feb 21 6.48pm

Originally posted by Badger11

Not seen it but you should take Hollywood biopics and even documentaries with a pinch of salt.

For every documentary that lead to a conviction being over turned there are plenty where authorities involved in the case point out that the film ignored evidence or put too much weight on a witness or even so what the jury heard all this and still found them guilty, nothing new etc.

Spector was a rich man and so I assume could afford a decent team of lawyers he had his day in court and the jury decided he was guilty.

I understand that but it did make me question if he was jailed through his reputation and appearance and not the actual evidence.
Would you trust a jury to acquit if you were innocent?

Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11 Beckenham 06 Feb 21 7.09pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger I understand that but it did make me question if he was jailed through his reputation and appearance and not the actual evidence. Would you trust a jury to acquit if you were innocent? It's not like you have a choice! One more point
Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11

Beckenham 06 Feb 21 7.09pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

I understand that but it did make me question if he was jailed through his reputation and appearance and not the actual evidence.
Would you trust a jury to acquit if you were innocent?

It's not like you have a choice!

One more point

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 06 Feb 21 7.47pm
Originally posted by Badger11 It's not like you have a choice! You have a choice as to trust them or not but no choice about their verdict. I looked at the actual Spector evidence and it was more complicated than the movie suggested unsurprisingly.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

06 Feb 21 7.47pm

Originally posted by Badger11

It's not like you have a choice!

You have a choice as to trust them or not but no choice about their verdict.
I looked at the actual Spector evidence and it was more complicated than the movie suggested unsurprisingly.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 3 of 3 << First < 1 2 3

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Phil Spector

Site Map

Sponsors