US politics
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 SW19 CPFC  Addiscombe West 22 Jan 21 12.27am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matthau
Glad this thread came about. I just wanted to offer an apology. I was so pssd off on Inauguration Day. The ol Jack Daniels came out! But I woke up the next day and, well, all I can say is that I still beleive in it all. So I appologise for wasting your time regarding the big day but I can say hand on heart I Still beleive it all still and my reasons are - I have since realised trump needed to be fully out of power. Wasn’t on the day. Military had to have sole control. Also when things do happen people won’t be questioning trump. They’ll be questioning military or the Biden administration only Which is the entire point. Some weird happenings to back up my thoughts, - more troops are being brought in as we speak. Why? Trump left with a big smile, 17 flags behind him - 17th letter is? All previous presidents looked absolutely knackered and depressed. They looked scared. Harris put her purse between her hand before swearing on the bible. Very strange sight.
Once again, appologies but I’ll still be punching from this angle as I know soon, I’ll be proved right. Not that it’s about that. I want it to be over too But, a pandemic, track n trace apps able to be used, tek in place conveniently in same era, media hated trump ever since he ran as republican. Sorry. More to it all. Much more.
I’ll leave it here. Lol Edited by matthau (21 Jan 2021 11.11pm) The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. And that’s being kind. For gods sake don’t waste money on any of this - if you must stay buried in a rabbit hole of your own gullibility don’t pay or donate to influencers to validate their squalid choice of income stream and make it worse. And go easy on the spamming, yeah? Relentless repeat posting links from platforms and threads like x22 that are desperately scrabbling about to find ways of reframing to retain a monetisable user base is, annoying, to put it mildly. But as spamming / recruiting seems to be legal on these boards then who am I to question it. Also - it’s not your thinking now is it. It’s copy pasted from whichever moth attracting bright light you’ve been buzzing around instead of sleeping or doing something vaguely useful, then spewed verbatim into this thread, or sent to anyone and everyone you know to try to turn them into useless zombies. You haven’t realised trump needed to be out of power. You’ve been told that’s what you’re supposed to realise as the alternative is to confront the fact that you’ve been complete and utterly played. But no one likes to admit that something they’re so invested in is actually complete bollocks... see religion. Really the irony of calling us all sheep and that we need to wake up is wonderful. Everything your threads and SUBSCRIBE hungry false prophets told you was a lie, a ruse to build a user base and make money. It’s straight out of the religious radicalisation playbook. You won’t understand that, and that’s beyond depressing. Just don’t give them any of your cash. Sort your life out. Edited by SW19 CPFC (22 Jan 2021 12.30am)
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Stirlingsays 22 Jan 21 12.58am |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matthau
Military is in dc now and they are growing in numbers. Something is happening I’ll leave it here. Lol Edited by matthau (21 Jan 2021 11.11pm) The leadership in western militaries have been vetted for decades now to exclude the types who would be needed for a military takeover. That said, the military will be ideologically attacked by the Democratics to turn them more left wing....it's pretty dangerous, but they don't care. Military culture will be attacked for being too masculine and funding and numbers will be reduced. It's certainly true that they have just protected their enemies into office. But the military top brass just aren't nationalists, like I say, that's vetted out....They are careerists amd constitutionists....even though the Democratics have and will work against that as well. I'll link you to one of the leading voices in the British dissentient right talking about recent events and the 'Q' question.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 becky over the moon 22 Jan 21 7.22am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matthau
Glad this thread came about. I just wanted to offer an apology. I was so pssd off on Inauguration Day. The ol Jack Daniels came out! But I woke up the next day and, well, all I can say is that I still beleive in it all. So I appologise for wasting your time regarding the big day but I can say hand on heart I Still beleive it all still and my reasons are - I have since realised trump needed to be fully out of power. Wasn’t on the day. Military had to have sole control. Also when things do happen people won’t be questioning trump. They’ll be questioning military or the Biden administration only Which is the entire point. Some weird happenings to back up my thoughts, - more troops are being brought in as we speak. Why? Trump left with a big smile, 17 flags behind him - 17th letter is? All previous presidents looked absolutely knackered and depressed. They looked scared. Harris put her purse between her hand before swearing on the bible. Very strange sight.
Once again, appologies but I’ll still be punching from this angle as I know soon, I’ll be proved right. Not that it’s about that. I want it to be over too But, a pandemic, track n trace apps able to be used, tek in place conveniently in same era, media hated trump ever since he ran as republican. Sorry. More to it all. Much more.
I’ll leave it here. Lol Edited by matthau (21 Jan 2021 11.11pm) Rather than leave it here (US Politics thread) where it seems to now be barely relevant, you should perhaps consider starting your own thread on Q, where those who are interested can share and debate with you, and the rest can carry on talking about the new President on here.
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 22 Jan 21 8.28am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by croydon proud
Obviously my laptop is playing up maple, or i"m being censored by mods who said they know who i am-or rather was! Thats why i just posted stuck on page 10, i could see a couple of posters had posted but my page wouldnt let me get that far!so if you see the same post 2 or 3 times by me, its because i press send and nothing happens, so press again and hey presto, i have 2 posts! Would you mind saying that again.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 22 Jan 21 9.17am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by becky
Rather than leave it here (US Politics thread) where it seems to now be barely relevant, you should perhaps consider starting your own thread on Q, where those who are interested can share and debate with you, and the rest can carry on talking about the new President on here.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| SavoyTruffle 22 Jan 21 9.42am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Matov
I confess I struggle with almost all of them (apart from Bannon). In fact, the entire 'pardon frenzy' at the end of any Presidents term is sketchy across the board. Certainly left a sour taste in my mouth though. Will put my hands up to that. Fair enough for being honest. I'm not a fan of the presidential pardon either, but I think there are times when it can be used appropriately - although there were maybe 4/5 in the list of a 100 or so of Trump's that I fully agreed with. I was hoping he might use it as a bit of an opportunity to show the middle finger to the neo-cons and establishment liberals and pardon someone like Assange or Snowden. Those would have put some noses out of joint on both sides aisle. To be fair on the Bannon one, I think if you asked a bulk of the people who donated to that fund, they would probably be pretty fine with Bannon using the money on himself. Something about a multi millionaire defrauding small dollar donations that doesn't quite chime with his populist message though for me. Out of interest, would I be fair to assume with regards to Bannon that you feel the pardon appropriate not in terms of the alleged crime but more in that he will be essential to any future political movement or strategy of Trump's?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| SavoyTruffle 22 Jan 21 9.50am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matthau
all I can say is that I still beleive in it all. So I appologise for wasting your time regarding the big day but I can say hand on heart I Still beleive it all still and my reasons are - I have since realised trump needed to be fully out of power. Wasn’t on the day. Military had to have sole control. Also when things do happen people won’t be questioning trump. They’ll be questioning military or the Biden administration only Which is the entire point. Edited by matthau (21 Jan 2021 11.11pm) Fool me once, shame on Q. Fool me twice, shame on me. In all seriousness, just to echo some of the other messages on this thread - just don't give any of these Q influencers any of your money.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 22 Jan 21 10.09am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by SavoyTruffle
Fair enough for being honest. I'm not a fan of the presidential pardon either, but I think there are times when it can be used appropriately - although there were maybe 4/5 in the list of a 100 or so of Trump's that I fully agreed with. I was hoping he might use it as a bit of an opportunity to show the middle finger to the neo-cons and establishment liberals and pardon someone like Assange or Snowden. Those would have put some noses out of joint on both sides aisle. To be fair on the Bannon one, I think if you asked a bulk of the people who donated to that fund, they would probably be pretty fine with Bannon using the money on himself. Something about a multi millionaire defrauding small dollar donations that doesn't quite chime with his populist message though for me. Out of interest, would I be fair to assume with regards to Bannon that you feel the pardon appropriate not in terms of the alleged crime but more in that he will be essential to any future political movement or strategy of Trump's? Bannon is one of the few prominent well known voices on the right against how globalism works. The system and its lackeys would love him behind bars. Personally I think Trump's time fronting is done for many reasons....the Trump of 2015 was not what we got in the White House and what he actually ended up doing let a lot of his supporters down. Still, he was far better than what's just been installed. I completely agree with you on Assange.....I have some issues with Snowden but I would have much rather he'd been released than many that Trump pardoned. Again, this wasn't the 2015/16 Trump who was elected. Edited by Stirlingsays (22 Jan 2021 10.10am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| silvertop Portishead 22 Jan 21 10.19am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matthau
Glad this thread came about. I just wanted to offer an apology. I was so pssd off on Inauguration Day. The ol Jack Daniels came out! But I woke up the next day and, well, all I can say is that I still beleive in it all. So I appologise for wasting your time regarding the big day but I can say hand on heart I Still beleive it all still and my reasons are - I have since realised trump needed to be fully out of power. Wasn’t on the day. Military had to have sole control. Also when things do happen people won’t be questioning trump. They’ll be questioning military or the Biden administration only Which is the entire point. Some weird happenings to back up my thoughts, - more troops are being brought in as we speak. Why? Trump left with a big smile, 17 flags behind him - 17th letter is? All previous presidents looked absolutely knackered and depressed. They looked scared. Harris put her purse between her hand before swearing on the bible. Very strange sight.
Once again, appologies but I’ll still be punching from this angle as I know soon, I’ll be proved right. Not that it’s about that. I want it to be over too But, a pandemic, track n trace apps able to be used, tek in place conveniently in same era, media hated trump ever since he ran as republican. Sorry. More to it all. Much more.
I’ll leave it here. Lol Edited by matthau (21 Jan 2021 11.11pm) For a moment I was concerned about clicking on your post as I was concerned my computer might take on some malware. Entertaining as always.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Hrolf The Ganger 22 Jan 21 10.34am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
Who is this communist? And is he a communist as properly defined, or a liberal socialist etc.? And are you suggesting that this news/politics section of this site is, on balance, "leftist". Clearly, it's left of you - everything and everybody is. And I am aware that left and right are tricky terms to properly define (leave it Stirling!). However... I see on here a small handful of those with left leaning ideas who tend to post reasonably and with thought (although perhaps one needs to pick his battles and not take every bait); and a mass of right wingers who outnumber and out post them by some margin but are divided by a more or less equal number who counter balance the lefty views with equally considered and erudite righty thoughts; and then, sadly, a significant cohort of shouty, aggressive, bullying types who generally spout views regurgitated from the Tory press, or "misc" far right sources or, more worryingly, from their own original thoughts. I'm talking about the 'Comrades' site which is run by a self confessed communist. Clearly (I thought), my point was that Nick even managed to get himself banned from a site run by someone at least as left leaning as himself. I laugh at the thought that you think I am to the right of everybody. I am a moderate. Your view seems to have been distorted by too may hour of exposure to our wonderful media.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 22 Jan 21 10.40am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
You fool only yourself. How many read the Mail, Express and Telegraph online? How many turn to right-wing groups on FB (they are still there) and now Gab, Telegraph and Parler? Fox News, Breitbart and OANN are hardly left-wing broadcasters. I no more wish to silence opposing views than start to support Brighton. What I do approve of is removing the access of those who seek to promote extreme views, including hatred and violence. What their political stance is is unimportant. In a democracy such views are unlawful and ought never to be given oxygen. So long as anyone avoids such things and argues about a political approach then all is well. Are you seriously suggesting that the vast majority of the mainstream media is not left/liberal? All the big players, BBC, ITN, Channel 4 and 5, CNN Twitter, Facebook etc all fit that category. You are clutching at straws man.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Matov 22 Jan 21 11.03am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by SavoyTruffle
But Trump is finished. Over and done with. Bannon still has a massive role to play as I rate him as the greatest political thinker of the 21st century hence why his pardon was so welcome. But there were others that could have also had a massive impact but were ignored. As to the pardons, then the more I look at the list, the more my disgust grows with them. Some sickening names on there and for what? That is what I struggle with. The Right needs a figurehead to unite around or at least be able to front a wider campaign on the electoral battleground. Beginning to suspect we might be a decade or so away from that when it could be too late. Need to see how things pan out when the dust settles. What really scares me at the moment is the fawning over Biden from the media. Not even a pretence being made about holding him to account for anything. But I am willing to concede this is early days. Lets see.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.