I'm beginning to realise how forums such as this one ( I don't go on any others) seem to cultivate hatred and mistrust whether it be towards Trump, the left, China or even eating fish and chips on a Friday.

Check this out

[Link]

I think that would traditionally be the position but I think there is now a growing realisation amongst the left or right normies....even if the left are in power in the states (and in many senses here)....that globalism (which is just another manifestation of financial elites) truly rules the system much more than any political figurehead.

Nothing really changes as the system is made to suit those financial elites and not the plebs.....no one is draining no swamp.

Even though both Trump and Corbyn were political enemies and see the world very differently they both had that anti globalist footing in common. Even though Trump was far more half hearted in reality than Corbyn would have been.....because as we know, Trump wasn't a globalist but he was an elite and so he was never going to meteorically be the Turkey who voted for Christmas.

Edited by Stirlingsays (25 Jan 2021 6.37pm)

I may be wrong to state upfront as I’ve only read, halfheartedly, snippets of this, but my impression was that Biden wants social media to held more accountable for what is posted on there, so more censorship. Happy to be challenged as said not exactly we’ll read on this.

I agree. But what we're seeing already could well be the result of the deep fake technology.
Off the top of my head some events that may require further scrutiny are last month's Queen's Christmas message, the London New Year's Eve firework display and...
...more importantly and on topic...
...last week's inauguration.

Have a close look at Biden's Oval Office and then investigate Castle Rock Productions, California.

I get the idea that with enough effort all of these can be faked with today's technology.

However, the Queen has been reading the scripts of her bosses for decades now, so I hardly think they need to fake anything. She would literally say anything as long as it ensured the Monarchy continued.

I never saw the fireworks display myself so while I could see how that could easily be faked I would question as to the purpose.....well, I suppose it would have saved quite a lot of money.

The problem you have with faking the inauguration is with numbers. For example, the inauguration had over 60 thousand enforcement officers when you add both Police and Military. Those people exist just as much as the politicians do and as you know, most of them would have voted republican.

If that event was faked, you couldn't have kept the grass roots of the military quiet.

I think you need to accept that if 'Q' were real, the takeover would have happened long since before now.

I get the idea that with enough effort all of these can be faked with today's technology.

However, the Queen has been reading the scripts of her bosses for decades now, so I hardly think they need to fake anything. She would literally say anything as long as it ensured the Monarchy continued.

I never saw the fireworks display myself so while I could see how that could easily be faked I would question as to the purpose.....well, I suppose it would have saved quite a lot of money.

The problem you have with faking the inauguration is with numbers. For example, the inauguration had over 60 thousand enforcement officers when you add both Police and Military. Those people exist just as much as the politicians do and as you know, most of them would have voted republican.

If that event was faked, you couldn't have kept the grass roots of the military quiet.

I think you need to accept that if 'Q' were real, the takeover would have happened long since before now.