You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > US politics
March 28 2024 8.22pm

US politics

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 334 of 607 < 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 >

 

View berlinpalace's Profile berlinpalace Flag berlin 28 Nov 22 6.37am Send a Private Message to berlinpalace Add berlinpalace as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

I think it’s called stereotyping not racism although meanings change for the receiver nowadays. Always good for a handkerchief and a cuddle.


As a defence of casual racism it’s not that convincing, but then I’m not expecting any great intellectual insight from the right wing. I hope I didn’t hurt your feelings there.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 28 Nov 22 7.22am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by berlinpalace


As a defence of casual racism it’s not that convincing, but then I’m not expecting any great intellectual insight from the right wing. I hope I didn’t hurt your feelings there.


The Germans are the same race as me, European. I have no sodding issue with Germans anymore than I have with the Welsh. Being English a percent of my genes are Germanic anyway.

Making cultural references aligned to popular German names isn't 'casual racism' you berk. You are on here complaining about groomers being exposed and using any means you can to b1tch and moan about those who point it out.

Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Nov 2022 7.34am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 28 Nov 22 7.25am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Noticing a pattern?

Normalising, discussing the issues within the public sphere as a topic of understanding. That's always the first phrase and it happened for decades before all their other sexual breakthroughs to attack the traditional family.

They are against anything that's strong and successful, that's obvious from their veneration of victim status. Their focus is especially within the western sphere as that's where most of the ideology is taught. Why do the vulnerable believe it? Well, that's a spiralling den of despair, sometimes self-hatred, father issues and other mental problems and sometimes idealogy born from selective and amplified indoctrinated versions of history.

Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Nov 2022 7.36am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 28 Nov 22 8.10am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Less than 50% of students at Cambridge are straight.

[Link]

This is our next generation. Why do I think this is just a fad as straight is boring and most young people are desperate to be interesting.

Still it plays into the left alphabet soup playbook because these people will be the movers and shakers in twenty years.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 28 Nov 22 10.51am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Just how annoyingly asinine that commentary is.

No one is saying that grooming is exclusive, hell I've spent considerable time posting about grooming gangs who are heterosexuals.

The point is the expansion and enabling of grooming from this area. This wasn't mainstreamed before and now progressives practically encourage this behaviour.

What is truly asinine is regarding my comment as asinine!

There is a very important distinction to be made, which the position you consistently take, whether on the UK grooming gang problems, or on this targeting of the LGBT community in the USA, fails to understand, let alone acknowledge.

Which is that it's the crime, and the criminal, which needs to be addressed and not the community they come from nor their religious beliefs or any other attributes they might innocently share with others.

You seem to think that suggesting that a disproportionate number coming from any particular background, whether or not through an accurate, or imagined, perception, is a reasonable and acceptable basis for discussion.

I do not. I think it distorts the issue, taints communities, builds barriers and creates divisions. I think it's counter productive in trying to deal with serious matters and that this approach makes things worse, not better.

The targeting of the LGBT communities in the USA is grossly unreasonable. That the behaviour of some people is unacceptable is not the same as suggesting all those who share some aspects with them is. After all we all share some aspects with everyone else. Why pick on those you just don't like?

Those who take this approach need to blow away the fog of their own prejudices and see the crimes and the criminals for what they are. They are crimes and criminals. Nothing else.

Edited by Wisbech Eagle (28 Nov 2022 11.03am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 28 Nov 22 11.01am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Ok, so you are a naturist who likes to be nude in the allotted areas and can see no harm and nor can; whatever floats your boat and you sing it’s praises and feel more should try it, again fair enough. Now if a local school asked you to read to the kids and explain about naturism and it’s rights and wrongs would you wear clothes. I bet you would. Why should a drag Queen not read to kids dressed in their civvies. I know the two ronnies and other shows etc before that but this is done solely for a reaction to try to normalise how they dress and parade. It’s wrong even just for the fact that the kids don’t understand it. Why arnt they doing it in front of 300 odd 15 year olds. Because they would get absolutely nailed and they know it. Cowardice comes in many forms !

I am sorry but I see no connection to the point I made. I don't think a drag Queen should talking about their lifestyle to young children, however dressed. I do think, at an appropriate age, children should be better educated than my generation was, about what relationships in the modern world look like today and the way that some folk identify and behave. Children are going to become aware so it's better the subject is treated properly, and not hidden away in a closet.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View berlinpalace's Profile berlinpalace Flag berlin 28 Nov 22 12.04pm Send a Private Message to berlinpalace Add berlinpalace as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

Less than 50% of students at Cambridge are straight.

[Link]

This is our next generation. Why do I think this is just a fad as straight is boring and most young people are desperate to be interesting.

Still it plays into the left alphabet soup playbook because these people will be the movers and shakers in twenty years.


No, if they want to get into positions of influence they should be trashing restaurants and having sex with dead pigs.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 28 Nov 22 12.19pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by berlinpalace


No, if they want to get into positions of influence they should be trashing restaurants and having sex with dead pigs.

LOL

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 28 Nov 22 1.42pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

What is truly asinine is regarding my comment as asinine!

There is a very important distinction to be made, which the position you consistently take, whether on the UK grooming gang problems, or on this targeting of the LGBT community in the USA, fails to understand, let alone acknowledge.

Which is that it's the crime, and the criminal, which needs to be addressed and not the community they come from nor their religious beliefs or any other attributes they might innocently share with others.

You seem to think that suggesting that a disproportionate number coming from any particular background, whether or not through an accurate, or imagined, perception, is a reasonable and acceptable basis for discussion.

I do not. I think it distorts the issue, taints communities, builds barriers and creates divisions. I think it's counter productive in trying to deal with serious matters and that this approach makes things worse, not better.

The targeting of the LGBT communities in the USA is grossly unreasonable. That the behaviour of some people is unacceptable is not the same as suggesting all those who share some aspects with them is. After all we all share some aspects with everyone else. Why pick on those you just don't like?

Those who take this approach need to blow away the fog of their own prejudices and see the crimes and the criminals for what they are. They are crimes and criminals. Nothing else.

Edited by Wisbech Eagle (28 Nov 2022 11.03am)

There are statistical facts regarding child abuse that I haven't gone into here. Those who wish to find them are free to, I know them....you as usual couldn't give a damn. You are far more interested in your narcissist virtue signal over points that haven't been made.

Well regardless very old bean, facts don't care about your feelings or anybody else's. That said, these were not my point.

Another fact, that we constantly see here, is your continual attempt to manipulate the discussion around to attacks on the alphabet mob.

I'll state this again, because you ignored it the first time.

Being a homosexual does not mean you are a kiddie fiddler, there will be many within that community just as p1ssed off by degeneracy around children as I am....In fact I know of several who are.

Still, this will no doubt make no difference to your continual word salad of victimhood defence.

People who want to talk about sex to very young children should be told to feck off. Previous generations had the commonsense to know this. You however don't agree.


Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Nov 2022 1.46pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 28 Nov 22 8.07pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I am sorry but I see no connection to the point I made. I don't think a drag Queen should talking about their lifestyle to young children, however dressed. I do think, at an appropriate age, children should be better educated than my generation was, about what relationships in the modern world look like today and the way that some folk identify and behave. Children are going to become aware so it's better the subject is treated properly, and not hidden away in a closet.

Agreed. How old ?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 28 Nov 22 8.09pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by berlinpalace


No, if they want to get into positions of influence they should be trashing restaurants and having sex with dead pigs.

That’s a necrapiggiac

Edited by cryrst (28 Nov 2022 8.10pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 28 Nov 22 10.55pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

There are statistical facts regarding child abuse that I haven't gone into here. Those who wish to find them are free to, I know them....you as usual couldn't give a damn. You are far more interested in your narcissist virtue signal over points that haven't been made.

Well regardless very old bean, facts don't care about your feelings or anybody else's. That said, these were not my point.

Another fact, that we constantly see here, is your continual attempt to manipulate the discussion around to attacks on the alphabet mob.

I'll state this again, because you ignored it the first time.

Being a homosexual does not mean you are a kiddie fiddler, there will be many within that community just as p1ssed off by degeneracy around children as I am....In fact I know of several who are.

Still, this will no doubt make no difference to your continual word salad of victimhood defence.

People who want to talk about sex to very young children should be told to feck off. Previous generations had the commonsense to know this. You however don't agree.


Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Nov 2022 1.46pm)

That's quite an interesting reply! Interesting in that not one word of it actually has anything at all to do with the points I was making. Almost everything you write above would not be disputed by me, excepting, of course, your silly misrepresentation of my own approach. For the record, of course I don't think anyone should talk about sex to very young children. What a disgusting misrepresentation of what I actually wrote!

What this tends to prove is that either you genuinely don't understand the issues or, more likely in my opinion, don't want to acknowledge and address them because to do so would pull the rug from under your whole hypothesis.

I am not in any way defending anyone. A defence is not needed. I am criticising the way the right wrongly describe criminals and now, in the USA, are attacking a whole section of society based solely on their prejudices.

So rather than deflect again perhaps you would try to actually face the issue. Why do the right do this? What are they hoping to achieve by it? I can see no benefit politically. Is it just to keep the base energised and to give them some red meat to chew and their eyes away from troubling internal strife?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 334 of 607 < 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > US politics