US politics

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 105 of 613 < 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 >

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 9.27am
Originally posted by Lombardinho [Link] Coming from someone who appears to think "Q" is real? You are having a laugh! For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 9.27am

Originally posted by Lombardinho

[Link]

Coming from someone who appears to think "Q" is real?

You are having a laugh!

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 19 May 21 10.36am
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle No-one other than Mueller, his team and the NY attorney has the evidence. It was redacted. Mueller's statement was enough. Barr's ruling scuppered any further action at that time. The "Democrats" weren't involved. Mueller's enquiry was initiated by Trump's own justice department. As predicted though, the squeeze on Trump is beginning to tighten. Not yet on Russia. Be patient. [Link] Always with the jam tomorrow. The more the Democrats wish to attack Trump the better....it's accelerationism. Elites on the right need to be in fear before a necessary split and schism can happen. Trump is a massive figure in Republicanism so this aggression is welcome as far as I'm concerned. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 May 2021 10.37am) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

19 May 21 10.36am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

No-one other than Mueller, his team and the NY attorney has the evidence. It was redacted. Mueller's statement was enough. Barr's ruling scuppered any further action at that time.

The "Democrats" weren't involved. Mueller's enquiry was initiated by Trump's own justice department.

As predicted though, the squeeze on Trump is beginning to tighten. Not yet on Russia. Be patient.

[Link]

Always with the jam tomorrow.

The more the Democrats wish to attack Trump the better....it's accelerationism. Elites on the right need to be in fear before a necessary split and schism can happen. Trump is a massive figure in Republicanism so this aggression is welcome as far as I'm concerned.

Edited by Stirlingsays (19 May 2021 10.37am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 19 May 21 10.41am
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle That US politics can be a dirty business is undoubtedly true. So though is the improbability of any large scale conspiracy remaining undiscovered these days. With whistleblowing, investigative journalism and the prospect of fame and fortune so readily available it's going to be found out. There are more than enough suitably motivated outlets for such information. So if it was true then the proof would have been found by now. It hasn't. Therefore, the conclusion has to be that it is extremely unlikely that it ever will be and is therefore untrue. Scandal always leaks. It tends to. However, how far it's known to the masses can be controlled. The media control the megaphone just as they shape the attitudes of their demographics. The idea of a 'free press' was always a bit of a myth...because he who pays the piper calls the tune....Still there use to be more independent journalists around in the past....that is definite. I look to alternative media myself, though I recognise that it also has its issues. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 May 2021 10.48am) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

19 May 21 10.41am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That US politics can be a dirty business is undoubtedly true.

So though is the improbability of any large scale conspiracy remaining undiscovered these days. With whistleblowing, investigative journalism and the prospect of fame and fortune so readily available it's going to be found out. There are more than enough suitably motivated outlets for such information.

So if it was true then the proof would have been found by now. It hasn't. Therefore, the conclusion has to be that it is extremely unlikely that it ever will be and is therefore untrue.

Scandal always leaks.

It tends to.

However, how far it's known to the masses can be controlled.

The media control the megaphone just as they shape the attitudes of their demographics.

The idea of a 'free press' was always a bit of a myth...because he who pays the piper calls the tune....Still there use to be more independent journalists around in the past....that is definite.

I look to alternative media myself, though I recognise that it also has its issues.

Edited by Stirlingsays (19 May 2021 10.48am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 11.47am
Originally posted by Stirlingsays Always with the jam tomorrow. The more the Democrats wish to attack Trump the better....it's accelerationism. Elites on the right need to be in fear before a necessary split and schism can happen. Trump is a massive figure in Republicanism so this aggression is welcome as far as I'm concerned. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 May 2021 10.37am) It's not though the "Democrats" attacking Trump is it? Frankly I would guess they would not want to poke a vipers nest and would prefer to allow him to destroy himself with his outrageous claims. Making him appear to be a martyr isn't helpful. It's the law which is doing its job. Slowly, thoroughly and, hopefully, non-politically. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 11.47am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Always with the jam tomorrow.

Edited by Stirlingsays (19 May 2021 10.37am)

It's not though the "Democrats" attacking Trump is it? Frankly I would guess they would not want to poke a vipers nest and would prefer to allow him to destroy himself with his outrageous claims. Making him appear to be a martyr isn't helpful.

It's the law which is doing its job. Slowly, thoroughly and, hopefully, non-politically.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 19 May 21 11.56am
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Coming from someone who appears to think "Q" is real? You are having a laugh! You'll be telling me Santa's not real next. Red and Blue Army!
Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC

Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 19 May 21 11.56am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Coming from someone who appears to think "Q" is real?

You are having a laugh!

You'll be telling me Santa's not real next.

Red and Blue Army!

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 19 May 21 12.06pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle It's not though the "Democrats" attacking Trump is it? Frankly I would guess they would not want to poke a vipers nest and would prefer to allow him to destroy himself with his outrageous claims. Making him appear to be a martyr isn't helpful. It's the law which is doing its job. Slowly, thoroughly and, hopefully, non-politically. Of course it's the 'Democrats'. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

19 May 21 12.06pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

It's the law which is doing its job. Slowly, thoroughly and, hopefully, non-politically.

Of course it's the 'Democrats'.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 12.06pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays It tends to. However, how far it's known to the masses can be controlled. The media control the megaphone just as they shape the attitudes of their demographics. The idea of a 'free press' was always a bit of a myth...because he who pays the piper calls the tune....Still there use to be more independent journalists around in the past....that is definite. I look to alternative media myself, though I recognise that it also has its issues. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 May 2021 10.48am) Newspapers always like a good story that helps circulation irrespective of where it comes from. I have a friend, now retired, who was a senior journalist for the Mail and previous to that at the Express. I am sure you would agree neither could be described as left wing papers. We have been friends for a very long time and when, in 1968, Powell made his "Rivers of Blood" speech the first conspiracy theory I can recall began to circulate. No social media back then, so this was all bar-room chatter. The story was that Powell was involved with some Army Generals and was planning to march to Westminster supported by tanks and take over Parliament. It seems this was widely believed. I lived near a military base at the time and the pub I used was frequented by personnel from the base. I picked up on some gossip from them which seemed to support the theory and passed it on to my friend. He was all over it in an instant, trying to find something they could publish. No suggestion at all that it would be suppressed in any way. So I do think that anything really genuine will find a way onto the public square and if it doesn't, it is almost certainly just a fanciful theory being promulgated either as mischief or for more sinister reasons. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 12.06pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

It tends to.

However, how far it's known to the masses can be controlled.

The media control the megaphone just as they shape the attitudes of their demographics.

The idea of a 'free press' was always a bit of a myth...because he who pays the piper calls the tune....Still there use to be more independent journalists around in the past....that is definite.

I look to alternative media myself, though I recognise that it also has its issues.

Edited by Stirlingsays (19 May 2021 10.48am)

Newspapers always like a good story that helps circulation irrespective of where it comes from. I have a friend, now retired, who was a senior journalist for the Mail and previous to that at the Express. I am sure you would agree neither could be described as left wing papers.

We have been friends for a very long time and when, in 1968, Powell made his "Rivers of Blood" speech the first conspiracy theory I can recall began to circulate. No social media back then, so this was all bar-room chatter. The story was that Powell was involved with some Army Generals and was planning to march to Westminster supported by tanks and take over Parliament. It seems this was widely believed.

I lived near a military base at the time and the pub I used was frequented by personnel from the base. I picked up on some gossip from them which seemed to support the theory and passed it on to my friend. He was all over it in an instant, trying to find something they could publish. No suggestion at all that it would be suppressed in any way.

So I do think that anything really genuine will find a way onto the public square and if it doesn't, it is almost certainly just a fanciful theory being promulgated either as mischief or for more sinister reasons.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 12.12pm
Originally posted by ASCPFC You'll be telling me Santa's not real next. Sad isn't it? But Leprechauns are though. I have seen them myself in Ireland, late at night, usually after a few pints of Guinness. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 12.12pm

Originally posted by ASCPFC

You'll be telling me Santa's not real next.

Sad isn't it?

But Leprechauns are though. I have seen them myself in Ireland, late at night, usually after a few pints of Guinness.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 12.14pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays Of course it's the 'Democrats'. Of course it is! It's all just a Witch hunt, isn't it? The problem being when the target is so obviously a witch you don't have to hunt too hard. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 12.14pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Of course it's the 'Democrats'.

Of course it is!

It's all just a Witch hunt, isn't it?

The problem being when the target is so obviously a witch you don't have to hunt too hard.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 19 May 21 12.21pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Newspapers always like a good story that helps circulation irrespective of where it comes from. I have a friend, now retired, who was a senior journalist for the Mail and previous to that at the Express. I am sure you would agree neither could be described as left wing papers. We have been friends for a very long time and when, in 1968, Powell made his "Rivers of Blood" speech the first conspiracy theory I can recall began to circulate. No social media back then, so this was all bar-room chatter. The story was that Powell was involved with some Army Generals and was planning to march to Westminster supported by tanks and take over Parliament. It seems this was widely believed. I lived near a military base at the time and the pub I used was frequented by personnel from the base. I picked up on some gossip from them which seemed to support the theory and passed it on to my friend. He was all over it in an instant, trying to find something they could publish. No suggestion at all that it would be suppressed in any way. So I do think that anything really genuine will find a way onto the public square and if it doesn't, it is almost certainly just a fanciful theory being promulgated either as mischief or for more sinister reasons. Both the Mail and Express are owned by globalist interests. When we talk about globalism we aren't really talking about the left wing....the left run the public institutions certainly but what's important to globalists is that left are mainly their 'useful idiots' and cheer leaders which they won because of the corporate pivots on social issues.....all decided after the Wall Street demonstrations in 2008. No, globalists are economically neo liberal and fully invested in whatever policies they think keep them in power and control over whatever arises within the political systems. They don't really care about left or right as long as their control isn't threatened. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 May 2021 12.35pm) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

19 May 21 12.21pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Both the Mail and Express are owned by globalist interests.

When we talk about globalism we aren't really talking about the left wing....the left run the public institutions certainly but what's important to globalists is that left are mainly their 'useful idiots' and cheer leaders which they won because of the corporate pivots on social issues.....all decided after the Wall Street demonstrations in 2008.

No, globalists are economically neo liberal and fully invested in whatever policies they think keep them in power and control over whatever arises within the political systems.

They don't really care about left or right as long as their control isn't threatened.

Edited by Stirlingsays (19 May 2021 12.35pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

BlueJay UK 19 May 21 12.21pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays Yeah, pretty much says it all. I posted a couple of jokes in a row. If you can't plaster on a smile and need to launch back after a yellow with the usual crap attitude, I'll remind you that mods previously had to remove multiple 'Philippines' themed type posts of yours about Wisbech. Posts that were ludicrous lies only posted due to hatred of an elderly cancer sufferer. So talk of misinformation falls closer to home I believe. Edited by BlueJay (19 May 2021 12.23pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

BlueJay

UK 19 May 21 12.21pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Yeah, pretty much says it all.

I posted a couple of jokes in a row. If you can't plaster on a smile and need to launch back after a yellow with the usual crap attitude, I'll remind you that mods previously had to remove multiple 'Philippines' themed type posts of yours about Wisbech. Posts that were ludicrous lies only posted due to hatred of an elderly cancer sufferer. So talk of misinformation falls closer to home I believe.

Edited by BlueJay (19 May 2021 12.23pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 19 May 21 12.32pm
Originally posted by BlueJay I posted a couple of jokes in a row. If you can't plaster on a smile and need to launch back after a yellow with the usual crap attitude, I'll remind you that mods had to remove multiple 'i know what you did in the Phillipines' posts of yours about Wisbech. Posts that were ludicrous lies only posted due to hatred of an elderly cancer sufferer. So talk of misinformation falls closer to home I believe. I never said, 'I know'.....but it seems you claim to. Interesting. I had no issues with those posts being deleted: I went too far on something I had no way of proving. Also what has cancer got to do with that? It wasn't even known on here at the time. As for misinformation....if it's proven that I'm wrong about something I'll always make amends. However as we can see with this tragic Policeman's death and certain people's hasty posts on it: You don't track back. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 May 2021 12.34pm) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

19 May 21 12.32pm

Originally posted by BlueJay

I posted a couple of jokes in a row. If you can't plaster on a smile and need to launch back after a yellow with the usual crap attitude, I'll remind you that mods had to remove multiple 'i know what you did in the Phillipines' posts of yours about Wisbech. Posts that were ludicrous lies only posted due to hatred of an elderly cancer sufferer. So talk of misinformation falls closer to home I believe.

I never said, 'I know'.....but it seems you claim to.

Interesting.

I had no issues with those posts being deleted: I went too far on something I had no way of proving. Also what has cancer got to do with that? It wasn't even known on here at the time.

As for misinformation....if it's proven that I'm wrong about something I'll always make amends.

However as we can see with this tragic Policeman's death and certain people's hasty posts on it: You don't track back.

Edited by Stirlingsays (19 May 2021 12.34pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 105 of 613 < 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

US politics

Site Map

Sponsors