Piers Morgan
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Rudi Hedman  Caterham 10 Mar 21 12.29pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Belmont
I was really talking about the main stream British press and the attached example seems to have different perspectives when you compare the two Kate had years of this. It ended. Meghan’s had only just started. None of that stuff is worth taking any notice of anyway, and if you don’t, it goes away. But Meghan is both a precious type who expects control of things and people around her. She also has her sights set on bigger things in the public eye so this all matters to her. All signs of narcissism. Include Oprah being at her wedding after meeting her once. Why do that? An eye on possible future needs. Without a doubt on that one. If you go back to the start of this thread I said I thought the press mocking and criticism had racist undertones, but as time went on you could calmly look and realise it wasn’t any different to previous. Then came the hypocrisy and fleeing for California just before lockdown. Edited by Rudi Hedman (10 Mar 2021 12.32pm)
COYP |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Spiderman Horsham 10 Mar 21 12.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Belmont
I was really talking about the main stream British press and the attached example seems to have different perspectives when you compare the two Just to be pedantic ( and I know nothing of the contents of those 2 articles) but Princess Charlotte was not born when Kate got married so her life could not be at risk! On a serious note, I see where you are coming from but Rudi is correct, I don’t think this treatment was racially motivated at all, just bog standard treatment meted out by the press
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 10 Mar 21 12.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Having been happy to lay bare the accusations, she should have at least had the bottle to name names. If she had named names the "culprit" would have faced a load of media s*** but by not naming names everyone in the Royal Family will be under suspicion which possibly helps her agenda
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| stuckinbristol In the woodwork. 10 Mar 21 12.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
If she had named names the "culprit" would have faced a load of media s*** but by not naming names everyone in the Royal Family will be under suspicion which possibly helps her agenda Or maybe have been able to call her out as a liar?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 10 Mar 21 1.01pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Belmont
I was really talking about the main stream British press and the attached example seems to have different perspectives when you compare the two Clutching at straws.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 10 Mar 21 1.07pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by stuckinbristol
Or maybe have been able to call her out as a liar? I'm sure that anyone in a mixed race relationship or close to someone who is, would wonder how the genes would be shared out. It is a natural curiosity. Let's not just accept that this is 'racist' on the word of some stupid attention seeking cow.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 10 Mar 21 1.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I'm sure that anyone in a mixed race relationship or close to someone who is, would wonder how the genes would be shared out. It is a natural curiosity. Let's not just accept that this is 'racist' on the word of some stupid attention seeking cow. I was very surprised to the posts on this thread on bbs. It does seem to be a normal topic of conversation in mixed race relationships, they can’t all be racist surely?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 10 Mar 21 1.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
The Sun (I know) are reporting that MM had complained to GMB and they told Morgan to issue on line apology which he refused to do. Edited by Spiderman (10 Mar 2021 1.29pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 10 Mar 21 1.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Of course it's normal just as a person with black hair having a baby with a blonde partner would wonder about the colour of the sprog's hair
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Tom-the-eagle Croydon 10 Mar 21 1.46pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
The press do seem to revel in treating people badly. Diana had a hard time, even Kate has had her moments. They do it to sportspeople all the time, doubt they will ever learn. Completely agree about press treating people badly, however in Megan’s case, she has been more than happy to use the press when she thinks it serves her so I have no sympathy for her. In my opinion she’s a media whore. The queen has been an incredible monarch, even an anti royal would have to agree with that. She’s an old lady who’s 99 year old husband is in hospital and now she has to put up with that MM spouting her mouth off, as if she doesn’t have enough to contend with right now.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Tom-the-eagle Croydon 10 Mar 21 1.49pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Of course it's normal just as a person with black hair having a baby with a blonde partner would wonder about the colour of the sprog's hair Maybe they were just worried it might be ginger
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH SW2 10 Mar 21 2.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Tom-the-eagle
Completely agree about press treating people badly, however in Megan’s case, she has been more than happy to use the press when she thinks it serves her so I have no sympathy for her. In my opinion she’s a media whore. The queen has been an incredible monarch, even an anti royal would have to agree with that. She’s an old lady who’s 99 year old husband is in hospital and now she has to put up with that MM spouting her mouth off, as if she doesn’t have enough to contend with right now. Genuine question - what makes an 'incredible monarch'? Given that she's the only one that most of us have had it's quite difficult to assess. Also, the role of the Queen is almost entirely ceremonial now, she doesn't actually have any real power in any decisions that are made.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.