You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Time to play the kids & question-mark players ?
April 20 2024 2.59am

Time to play the kids & question-mark players ?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 4 << First< 1 2 3 4

 

View Den1923's Profile Den1923 Flag 11 May 21 12.16am Send a Private Message to Den1923 Add Den1923 as a friend

Originally posted by Painter

So let's play the untried youngsters and get hammered, along with their confidence.[/quote

Very true and of course place money in the PL is very important to the club!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View aashman12's Profile aashman12 Flag 11 May 21 12.01pm Send a Private Message to aashman12 Add aashman12 as a friend

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

Cahill will be nearly 36 at the start of next season.


He has been a wonderful servant to Palace and i love him.

But , going forward, i do not trust his long-term health & fitness for a whole season.

We urgently need to find a 24 year old that can take his place.

Wonderful servant, 2 seasons?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Eaglehamster's Profile Eaglehamster Flag Storrington 11 May 21 12.06pm Send a Private Message to Eaglehamster Add Eaglehamster as a friend

Originally posted by Painter

So let's play the untried youngsters and get hammered, along with their confidence.


Just the point "untried". When do they ever get tried?

 


I have now sufficient funds to last me the rest of my life. Provided I don't buy anything.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View doombear's Profile doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 11 May 21 1.43pm Send a Private Message to doombear Add doombear as a friend

Originally posted by Eaglehamster


Just the point "untried". When do they ever get tried?


When the coaches deem them ready to be.

I've watched the youngsters a lot this season. Whilst some of the U18s look very promising, that is all they are at present IMO. Not ready for a PL baptism just yet.

The U23s are generally a less exciting bunch and the more senior ones have hardly covered themselves in glory in their loans out to League 1, League 2 and National league teams, so not ready for PL either and I suspect most of the U23s will end up either like Ryan Inniss, plying their trade in the lower leagues, or in non-league football. The more promising U23s are among those who joined us last summer when we were granted Categary 1 status.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 11 May 21 3.44pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

surely if
-the youth academy,
- the B team ,
- the loans
etc
are all not looking like Eagles then we replace them for somebody a bit sharper looking ?

there is no easy honeymoon in professional football

 


Eze Peasy at Anfield....

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 11 May 21 10.13pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Post-Southampton bump.....


cos our normal starting-eleven are dinosaurs

 


Eze Peasy at Anfield....

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Eaglehamster's Profile Eaglehamster Flag Storrington 11 May 21 10.45pm Send a Private Message to Eaglehamster Add Eaglehamster as a friend

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

Post-Southampton bump.....


cos our normal starting-eleven are dinosaurs


Can't help being pedantic here but dinosaurs were a hugely successful species until that nasty big rock hit the gulf of Mexico.

I do agree with your point - most of our team are past their SBD.

 


I have now sufficient funds to last me the rest of my life. Provided I don't buy anything.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HeathMan's Profile HeathMan Flag Purley 12 May 21 3.42am Send a Private Message to HeathMan Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add HeathMan as a friend

We have heard that select developing players have been invited to train with the senior squad.

We know that a manager has to keep senior players motivated.

One way of giving young players senior game time is to loan them - also loans do possibly bring in income, but I doubt whether our developing loaned players are fully off the CPFC Payroll when away from South London.

Sadly the loyalty of receiving managers to their contracted player means that loaned players can be rare starters.

Senior players are given "fitness check" starts in U23 matches.

Wayne Rooney was given minutes of senior match time in his early career. A substitute can be substituted.

Could a returning senior player (Jimmy Mac, Marmadue, James Tompkins be given just thirty minutes or forty minutes before coming off with the opportunity available to substitute the young player should he show too many signs of sinking?

We know that playing with ten men or caring for a developing player can focus senior player minds.

Go on Roy - show that you can still use new talent well - as you did when England Manager.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 4 of 4 << First< 1 2 3 4

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Time to play the kids & question-mark players ?