Ranieri took over at Fulham with the club bottom of the table on 5 pts after 12 games.

He was at Fulham for 16 PL games during which they collected 12 pts and when he departed they were 19th in the table.They went down that season.
Under Ranieri Fulham lost 2-1 at home to Oldham in the 3rd round of the FA Cup.

Would be an excellent appointment. Certainly has all the tactical knowledge, man management and experience. I also think he’s the type of name that would attract all types of players ie younger and older.

I’m just not sure we could attract him. He’s the type who could land a big 6 job across the main leagues if one of them has a bad start etc

Would be happy with this

Claudio Ranieri? Really?

What did you expect him to do, it wasnt his remit to buy players, just manage the team. The reality he got the best out of what he had. In fact most of the squad, when he arrived are still there. He didnt give them all long contracts.
Ranieri isnt the answer approaching 70 years of age, the Fulham period lost him qudos, the Leicester team were Pearsons team, he was just carrying on. We are looking for someone to build a team around our youth products, not his bag.

Yes maybe Roy, should have been more firm with the board. Possibly after six months, in much the same way as Pulis, and Big Sam ,were . It wouldn’t have made any difference because as they did he would have walked. Because few boards cave in to a manager.
It wouldn’t have altered the clubs strategy and financial behaviour one iota . It’s a guess but , I wouldnt be surprised if a few broken promises, his boyhood attachment, and a slice of pride, was what actually kept him here. The situation the club finds its self in is its own making. Ranieri, would be a bad move IMO. Though it’s difficult to say who would be best suited to guide what must be considered an extremely difficult proposition.