The 'far right' are largely a persecuted minority. They have no power and aren't going to see any. Not in this country anyway. Most of them are largely focused on community building and survival.

On the other hand what use to be considered the 'far left' now control much of the institutions and their buzz words and polices dominate the media and work policies. They are funded to the tune of millions by corporations.....They won because the elites chose them due to the 'long march'. They turned the middle class to the left out of financial inducement and by speaking the language of easy and largely cost free virtue signalling morality tales. They aren't even 'far left' anymore as they are the dominate force comprising the mainstream left.....all they have left to do is actually convince the general public to vote for them.

Yet apparently weak arsed fascism is the problem.....but only if it comes with a white skin.....because apparently that manic Hitler from 75 years ago....even though Hitler killed tens of millions of Europeans and Europeans ended him.

The Communist party on the other hand...whose ideology killed far more...boy Mao makes everyone else look amateur....well they get their headquarters in London (which was/is frequently visited by major figures in Labour) quite rightly suffer zero persecution and no one bats an eyelid or questions it.

Edited by Stirlingsays (19 Oct 2021 4.58pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Untrue. I compared the way one group made scapegoats of another with the way this poster seeks to treat all Muslims, rather target the radicalised, evil ones. That the first group's final solution was the Holocaust doesn't mean that his will replicate it, only that this attitude demands a final solution, of some kind.

If that final solution requires the removal of the Islamic faith from our shores, which is what he seems to advocate, then that would equate to ethnic cleansing, either by forced conversion or removal. I have asked him to detail his plan, but have not seen it, so must assume my assumptions are broadly correct.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

My "mentality" has enabled our country to become a more tolerant and inclusive place to live. One ready and able to face the realities of the world in 21st century. I spend no time at all fretting about the return of the Third Reich. It won't happen, as the majority of us reject such ideas. That's not to say that some, possibly without realising it and certainly without admitting it, harbour views that can stand comparison with some that we fought against in WW2.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Well 25% of the worlds muslims want a return to sharia law and the end of the western world. How's that for a figure to mull over.

Did you pull that out of a hat, or has every Muslim actually been asked?

Even if it was true, and in some places it could well be, it only goes to show the scale of the task we face.

Because face it we must. There is no realistic alternative.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

He said "Islamic faith has no place in this country."

What other conclusion can be drawn than the one I have described?

Even a moratorium on immigration is an unrealistic, self-defeating concept with repercussions likely to be far worse than any benefits. It's the knee-jerk reaction of those who see simple answers to complicated problems. Even our populist PM, who would jump at the chance of a few brownie points, hasn't suggested it.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.