You've not only talked about individual 'extinction' prior, you have used it to convey what you perceive to be genetic extiction. If your concern is our grandchildren being a minority unless you decide to operate by coersive family control regarding others procreation, you don't have meaningful say in racial realities on that level. As such. it's pointless to hold such a detached view of those who will inevitably by your own logic be 'your own' down the line not just some segment of genetic code you're desperately trying to escape from.

Aversions can be taken too far and often creep up and internal issues within families, rather than an external vent,. Well that or being forced to adopt a more realistic outlook about people and how to value them. God forbid. Immigration is realistically the beginning and end point of discussion on these issues. Drift too far from that and you're a walking advertisement for votes in the opposite direction rather than getting anyone onside.

Edited by footythoughts (18 Apr 2023 9.17pm)

I'm just highlighting realities of what happens when a political view expands to a point of group animus. Input in real terms begins and ends with immigration, and beyond that with the country as it stands people make their own choices. As I say dislike of non white DNA entering your line, by nature means that you'll either (entirely arbitrarily btw) end up with a degree of disliking or distancing of 'your own', or realising that there is much more to people and their worth than something you need visual hue or something a 23andme test tells you as prompt for.

I'm not sure that the experience of Native Americans and Aborigines will mirror your own, unless of course you view actual mass slaughter and genecide as the same as others moving to a country, and procreation also occuring between whites and non whites. Many millions see that for a small island we're not a home for all, don't have the resources, and vote accordingly (You 'do' need votes if you want change rather than a mope on repeat). You lose people though when people genuinely think that you hold a level of palpable disliNo ke of others based on largely arbitrary factors, because many of them are your countrymen and will remain as such.

Tory MP slams 'lefty luvvies' as she pinpoints blame for St. George's Day decline, not more and more people regarding it as the cobblers it is.

They are 'remainers' according to Andrea Jenkyn.

Not that I mind a National Day, but how about Shakespeare at least someone who was English.

Slaying dragons in Libya for the Romans does not somehow seem relevant to England, but then she is a 'leaver' so would not be attached to any reality herself, would she.

Every other country is allowed to have a national day. I remember when St George's day was a holiday (holyday!). And I remember the shops being closed. Then I remember shops being half-day. Then I remember it being nothing. I don't see why England isn't allowed what, for instance, Ireland have. If they want it to be secular have the Battle of Waterloo or Trafalgar day or something. Or armistice day or something if we're so inclined. But have the English flag and be proud of it for a change.

Every other country is allowed to have a national day. I remember when St George's day was a holiday (holyday!). And I remember the shops being closed. Then I remember shops being half-day. Then I remember it being nothing. I don't see why England isn't allowed what, for instance, Ireland have. If they want it to be secular have the Battle of Waterloo or Trafalgar day or something. Or armistice day or something if we're so inclined. But have the English flag and be proud of it for a change.