Watford V CPFC Match Thread
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 NEILLO  Shoreham-by-Sea 25 Feb 22 8.56am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Daddyorc
He did touch it, and it was going out (if not out already). For the person that says it's irrelevant, it isn't! If the ball was already out and the goalie touched Conor, is it a penalty? No! The incident took place directly ahead of where I was standing. Whether CG had the ball under control or not ( he didn't ), the contact made on him by Foster could have been given as a penalty. Not too dis-similar to the Jota decision that went against us. Was it even reviewed by VAR ? No. And while the people in charge of VAR are the same people that make inconsistent decisions when they are refereeing, we aren't going to see the best use of that technology.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 25 Feb 22 9.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by NEILLO
The incident took place directly ahead of where I was standing. Whether CG had the ball under control or not ( he didn't ), the contact made on him by Foster could have been given as a penalty. Not too dis-similar to the Jota decision that went against us. Was it even reviewed by VAR ? No. And while the people in charge of VAR are the same people that make inconsistent decisions when they are refereeing, we aren't going to see the best use of that technology. As I have previously elucidated, whenever there are subjective decisions there will always be accusations of "Inconsistency" etc etc.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 25 Feb 22 9.07am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
As I have previously elucidated, whenever there are subjective decisions there will always be accusations of "Inconsistency" etc etc. Yes there will be and rightly so. It's been the main complaint about officials, from players and spectators, ever since I can remember.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 25 Feb 22 9.57am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by NEILLO
The incident took place directly ahead of where I was standing. Whether CG had the ball under control or not ( he didn't ), the contact made on him by Foster could have been given as a penalty. Not too dis-similar to the Jota decision that went against us. Was it even reviewed by VAR ? No. And while the people in charge of VAR are the same people that make inconsistent decisions when they are refereeing, we aren't going to see the best use of that technology.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| CrazyBadger Ware 25 Feb 22 10.18am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by NEILLO
The incident took place directly ahead of where I was standing. Whether CG had the ball under control or not ( he didn't ), the contact made on him by Foster could have been given as a penalty. Not too dis-similar to the Jota decision that went against us. Was it even reviewed by VAR ? No. And while the people in charge of VAR are the same people that make inconsistent decisions when they are refereeing, we aren't going to see the best use of that technology. If it was not too dissimilar to the jota decision, then it should not have been given. I don't think it was - CG made no effort to initiate contact, the keeper was late into the challenge. That's a free kick if outside the box. does it matter where the ball was going? not sure. I've got no problem if we get 'inconsistent' VAR decisions if the inconsistency is born from improving past mistakes.
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
eagleman13  On The Road To Hell & Alicante 25 Feb 22 11.27am |
 |
|---|---|
|
Why has no-one even mentioned in the CG/Foster incident, there was a Watford defender(No14 Hassele) also involved? There will always be inconsistency, as believe it or not Refs are Human Beings. Humans make mistake, Humans view things differently, even on these boards/threads everyone has a different view/take on the same incident.
I'm a blind man, i'm a blind man, now my room is cold, |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| eritheagle Erith 25 Feb 22 11.28am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by doombear
No he wasn’t but unfortunately Butland got involved with the man Clyne was marking when he didn’t need to. The ball dropped well short of where Clyne was and Butland had a clear pathway.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| silvertop Portishead 25 Feb 22 11.51am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by spartakev2
Really, you'd take a point at home against Burnley who are third from bottom..... Given their form and the fact that a point will hurt them more than it hurts us, yes.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| babylonjohn St Leonards-on-Sea 25 Feb 22 12.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by doombear
Ha ha not much I reckon. Every player always claims its there throw in, claims they got the ball when penalised for fouling, claims they have done nothing wrong etc etc
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
taylors lovechild  25 Feb 22 12.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by NEILLO
The incident took place directly ahead of where I was standing. Whether CG had the ball under control or not ( he didn't ), the contact made on him by Foster could have been given as a penalty. Not too dis-similar to the Jota decision that went against us. Was it even reviewed by VAR ? No. And while the people in charge of VAR are the same people that make inconsistent decisions when they are refereeing, we aren't going to see the best use of that technology. I think that's the bigger issue, not whether it was a penalty or not but the fact VAR either didn't look at it at all, or gave it 5 seconds of attention. In contrast, when it comes to the big teams VAR seems to do a forensic analysis.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 25 Feb 22 12.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by taylors lovechild
I think that's the bigger issue, not whether it was a penalty or not but the fact VAR either didn't look at it at all, or gave it 5 seconds of attention. In contrast, when it comes to the big teams VAR seems to do a forensic analysis. Exactly. For the sake of clarity, I didn't think it was a penalty, but then again I didn't think the Jota incident was one either.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Eaglecoops CR3 25 Feb 22 12.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by NEILLO
Exactly. For the sake of clarity, I didn't think it was a penalty, but then again I didn't think the Jota incident was one either. The only 3 people on the planet who thought the Jota incident was a foul, were Klopp and the two match officials and even one of them changed his mind.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.