Abramovic sanctioned

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 11 of 17 < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >

Midlands Eagle Online 11 Mar 22 11.09am
Originally posted by silvertop Can you imagine the furore if Chelsea were given special treatment when other clubs have to face their insolvency issues with points deductions, other penalties and, in Bury's case (and almost ours), extinction. The other clubs' financial problems were of their own making whereas Chelsea's current financial position is the result of Government interference
Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle Online

11 Mar 22 11.09am

Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by silvertop

Can you imagine the furore if Chelsea were given special treatment when other clubs have to face their insolvency issues with points deductions, other penalties and, in Bury's case (and almost ours), extinction.

The other clubs' financial problems were of their own making whereas Chelsea's current financial position is the result of Government interference

Alert a moderator to this post

dreamwaverider Online London 11 Mar 22 11.40am
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle The other clubs' financial problems were of their own making whereas Chelsea's current financial position is the result of Government interference Not looking like a straightforward outcome at all.
Alert a moderator to this post

dreamwaverider Online

London 11 Mar 22 11.40am

Send a Private Message to dreamwaverider

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

The other clubs' financial problems were of their own making whereas Chelsea's current financial position is the result of Government interference

Not looking like a straightforward outcome at all.

Alert a moderator to this post

eagleman13 On The Road To Hell & Alicante 11 Mar 22 11.53am
Originally posted by dreamwaverider RA and Putin a closely linked in business. RA currently owns a frozen asset, Chelsea. According to our government they may consider giving a special license to sell that asset and presumably unfreeze it so long as RA receives none of the proceeds. The alternative which probably has not been considered is that RA does nothing follows the special license imposed on his frozen asset and watches Chelsea go under. That will leave him with an empty Stamford Bridge, frozen other than the rats and pigeons building up in it. The World Champions will have gone, champions league Champions etc etc. Imagine the disruption for football in Europe and here. Massive. Now we all know who likes disruption. Just look at Ukraine. Why would they give away Chelsea just to keep it sweet for us. Far more likely closure. Then what ? Ground seizure eventually for non payment of council tax and someone can secure a fantastic site in west london for re development or maybe planning will insist it must remain as a sports facility in which case someone could start a football club Candy land United springs to mind in the southern league. I nicked this piece off NEILLO from 9th Mar . . . Interesting that RA doesn't own the Freehold to Stamford Bridge. That belongs to the Ken Bates initiated group, Chelsea Pitch Owners. That came into being to prevent Chelsea's owners from selling the stadium and moving the club to a different site. So it would appear that Stamford Bridge cannot be sold for property development & must remain a Football Stadium, canny bloke that Ken Bates. I'm a blind man, i'm a blind man, now my room is cold, When a blind man cries, Lord, he feels it from his soul. [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

eagleman13

On The Road To Hell & Alicante 11 Mar 22 11.53am

Originally posted by dreamwaverider

RA and Putin a closely linked in business.
RA currently owns a frozen asset, Chelsea.
According to our government they may consider giving a special license to sell that asset and presumably unfreeze it so long as RA receives none of the proceeds. The alternative which probably has not been considered is that RA does nothing follows the special license imposed on his frozen asset and watches Chelsea go under. That will leave him with an empty Stamford Bridge, frozen other than the rats and pigeons building up in it.
The World Champions will have gone, champions league Champions etc etc.
Imagine the disruption for football in Europe and here. Massive.
Now we all know who likes disruption. Just look at Ukraine.
Why would they give away Chelsea just to keep it sweet for us.
Far more likely closure.
Then what ? Ground seizure eventually for non payment of council tax and someone can secure a fantastic site in west london for re development or maybe planning will insist it must remain as a sports facility in which case someone could start a football club
Candy land United springs to mind in the southern league.

I nicked this piece off NEILLO from 9th Mar . . .

Interesting that RA doesn't own the Freehold to Stamford Bridge. That belongs to the Ken Bates initiated group, Chelsea Pitch Owners. That came into being to prevent Chelsea's owners from selling the stadium and moving the club to a different site.

So it would appear that Stamford Bridge cannot be sold for property development & must remain a Football Stadium, canny bloke that Ken Bates.

I'm a blind man, i'm a blind man, now my room is cold,
When a blind man cries, Lord, he feels it from his soul.
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman Caterham 11 Mar 22 12.16pm
Originally posted by eagleman13 I nicked this piece off NEILLO from 9th Mar . . . Interesting that RA doesn't own the Freehold to Stamford Bridge. That belongs to the Ken Bates initiated group, Chelsea Pitch Owners. That came into being to prevent Chelsea's owners from selling the stadium and moving the club to a different site. So it would appear that Stamford Bridge cannot be sold for property development & must remain a Football Stadium, canny bloke that Ken Bates. And it will probably stop them from challenging at the top again. Unless they pull the same tricks Man City do of course. My guess is that Chelsea will become similar to spurs and arsenal, or West Ham. Before RA bought them they were beginning to challenge Arsenal but not quite there. This was while they were in �80-�90 million worth of debt during the stadium development. If it wasn�t for the huge debt and RA they�d be at best like Leicester then and now. The people I�m laughing at most are the people who haven�t had supporting Chelsea passed down to them through family, and that includes little Toby whose mum is looking forward to his first and only �200 trip to Chelsea. One young lady was on LBC yesterday complaining it wasn�t fair because she�s waited ages to go. Well boo hoo. But that Shelagh Fogarty wants it to go as far as possible of course. Matches stopped, relegation, whatever it was. She was right that after all the moronic phone callers their argument was just, ��It ain�t fair� Well football.�� COYP
Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman

Caterham 11 Mar 22 12.16pm

Originally posted by eagleman13

I nicked this piece off NEILLO from 9th Mar . . .

So it would appear that Stamford Bridge cannot be sold for property development & must remain a Football Stadium, canny bloke that Ken Bates.

And it will probably stop them from challenging at the top again. Unless they pull the same tricks Man City do of course.

My guess is that Chelsea will become similar to spurs and arsenal, or West Ham. Before RA bought them they were beginning to challenge Arsenal but not quite there. This was while they were in �80-�90 million worth of debt during the stadium development. If it wasn�t for the huge debt and RA they�d be at best like Leicester then and now.

The people I�m laughing at most are the people who haven�t had supporting Chelsea passed down to them through family, and that includes little Toby whose mum is looking forward to his first and only �200 trip to Chelsea. One young lady was on LBC yesterday complaining it wasn�t fair because she�s waited ages to go. Well boo hoo. But that Shelagh Fogarty wants it to go as far as possible of course. Matches stopped, relegation, whatever it was. She was right that after all the moronic phone callers their argument was just, ��It ain�t fair� Well football.��

COYP

Alert a moderator to this post

Wilesy01 Bristol 11 Mar 22 2.53pm
[Tweet Link] Apologies if this has been posted already but here's a clip of the journalist Matthew Syed commenting on RA's accumulation of wealth and his reasons for becoming involved with Chelsea in 2003. Goes to show how cynical the takeover was and raises questions as to how it was allowed.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wilesy01

Bristol 11 Mar 22 2.53pm

[Tweet Link]

Apologies if this has been posted already but here's a clip of the journalist Matthew Syed commenting on RA's accumulation of wealth and his reasons for becoming involved with Chelsea in 2003.

Goes to show how cynical the takeover was and raises questions as to how it was allowed.

Alert a moderator to this post

MrRobbo Purley 11 Mar 22 2.55pm
Originally posted by Wilesy01 [Tweet Link] Apologies if this has been posted already but here's a clip of the journalist Matthew Syed commenting on RA's accumulation of wealth and his reasons for becoming involved with Chelsea in 2003. Goes to show how cynical the takeover was and raises questions as to how it was allowed. As long as the powers that be get paid, they don't care one little bit.
Alert a moderator to this post

MrRobbo

Purley 11 Mar 22 2.55pm

Originally posted by Wilesy01

[Tweet Link]

Apologies if this has been posted already but here's a clip of the journalist Matthew Syed commenting on RA's accumulation of wealth and his reasons for becoming involved with Chelsea in 2003.

Goes to show how cynical the takeover was and raises questions as to how it was allowed.

As long as the powers that be get paid, they don't care one little bit.

Alert a moderator to this post

Crystal_Clear Belfast 11 Mar 22 3.36pm
Watching the news today, it looked lkke the Government are open to selling Chelsea as lkng as none of the proceeds goes to Abramovich or Russian interests. I think that Chelsea will be sold rather than it goto the wall. That being said, there are articles about Chelsea trying to offload their really high earners at the end of season ie. Lukaku, Werner, Havertz, Kante. The one player i'd love at Palace would be Pulisic. I think he is class.
Alert a moderator to this post

Crystal_Clear

Belfast 11 Mar 22 3.36pm

Watching the news today, it looked lkke the Government are open to selling Chelsea as lkng as none of the proceeds goes to Abramovich or Russian interests.

I think that Chelsea will be sold rather than it goto the wall.

That being said, there are articles about Chelsea trying to offload their really high earners at the end of season ie. Lukaku, Werner, Havertz, Kante.

The one player i'd love at Palace would be Pulisic. I think he is class.

Alert a moderator to this post

Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 11 Mar 22 3.40pm
Originally posted by Crystal_Clear Watching the news today, it looked lkke the Government are open to selling Chelsea as lkng as none of the proceeds goes to Abramovich or Russian interests. I think that Chelsea will be sold rather than it goto the wall. That being said, there are articles about Chelsea trying to offload their really high earners at the end of season ie. Lukaku, Werner, Havertz, Kante. The one player i'd love at Palace would be Pulisic. I think he is class. I don't see how handing Chelsea over to the 'wall would be of benefit to anyone. Would be a culture shock for some of the newer Chelsea fans! For the others, perhaps they could have a 'scum-off' between them, whatever that might look like. Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!
Alert a moderator to this post

Nicholas91

The Democratic Republic of Kent 11 Mar 22 3.40pm

Originally posted by Crystal_Clear

Watching the news today, it looked lkke the Government are open to selling Chelsea as lkng as none of the proceeds goes to Abramovich or Russian interests.

I think that Chelsea will be sold rather than it goto the wall.

That being said, there are articles about Chelsea trying to offload their really high earners at the end of season ie. Lukaku, Werner, Havertz, Kante.

The one player i'd love at Palace would be Pulisic. I think he is class.

I don't see how handing Chelsea over to the 'wall would be of benefit to anyone.

Would be a culture shock for some of the newer Chelsea fans! For the others, perhaps they could have a 'scum-off' between them, whatever that might look like.

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert a moderator to this post

dreamwaverider Online London 11 Mar 22 4.09pm
Originally posted by Crystal_Clear Watching the news today, it looked lkke the Government are open to selling Chelsea as lkng as none of the proceeds goes to Abramovich or Russian interests. I think that Chelsea will be sold rather than it goto the wall. That being said, there are articles about Chelsea trying to offload their really high earners at the end of season ie. Lukaku, Werner, Havertz, Kante. The one player i'd love at Palace would be Pulisic. I think he is class. The only person I can think of who would morosely benefit from Chelsea going to the wall and the massive disruption that would cause in football in Europe would be Putin.And he has quite a big say in the decision. In addition why would they sell the frozen asset for nothing???? e.g. give it away. RA still owns the club, unless we seize it from him which is not going to happen. No Putin would far rather it messes us NATO crowd up in any way he can.
Alert a moderator to this post

dreamwaverider Online

London 11 Mar 22 4.09pm

Originally posted by Crystal_Clear

Watching the news today, it looked lkke the Government are open to selling Chelsea as lkng as none of the proceeds goes to Abramovich or Russian interests.

I think that Chelsea will be sold rather than it goto the wall.

That being said, there are articles about Chelsea trying to offload their really high earners at the end of season ie. Lukaku, Werner, Havertz, Kante.

The one player i'd love at Palace would be Pulisic. I think he is class.

The only person I can think of who would morosely benefit from Chelsea going to the wall and the massive disruption that would cause in football in Europe would be Putin.And he has quite a big say in the decision.

In addition why would they sell the frozen asset for nothing???? e.g. give it away.

RA still owns the club, unless we seize it from him which is not going to happen.

No Putin would far rather it messes us NATO crowd up in any way he can.

Alert a moderator to this post

dreamwaverider Online London 11 Mar 22 4.13pm
Originally posted by eagleman13 I nicked this piece off NEILLO from 9th Mar . . . Interesting that RA doesn't own the Freehold to Stamford Bridge. That belongs to the Ken Bates initiated group, Chelsea Pitch Owners. That came into being to prevent Chelsea's owners from selling the stadium and moving the club to a different site. So it would appear that Stamford Bridge cannot be sold for property development & must remain a Football Stadium, canny bloke that Ken Bates. So if Chelsea football club folds, I suppose Bates the Pitch owners could let it out to a newly formed sports club for a few bob a year. Or sell it to developers for zillions. Think they may change their tune at that point.
Alert a moderator to this post

dreamwaverider Online

London 11 Mar 22 4.13pm

Originally posted by eagleman13

I nicked this piece off NEILLO from 9th Mar . . .

So it would appear that Stamford Bridge cannot be sold for property development & must remain a Football Stadium, canny bloke that Ken Bates.

So if Chelsea football club folds, I suppose Bates the Pitch owners could let it out to a newly formed sports club for a few bob a year. Or sell it to developers for zillions. Think they may change their tune at that point.

Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle Online 11 Mar 22 4.16pm
Originally posted by dreamwaverider The only person I can think of who would morosely benefit from Chelsea going to the wall and the massive disruption that would cause in football in Europe would be Putin. The Labour Party would also gain as I doubt whether any Chelsea supporter would ever vote Conservative again
Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle Online

11 Mar 22 4.16pm

Originally posted by dreamwaverider

The only person I can think of who would morosely benefit from Chelsea going to the wall and the massive disruption that would cause in football in Europe would be Putin.

The Labour Party would also gain as I doubt whether any Chelsea supporter would ever vote Conservative again

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 11 Mar 22 4.37pm
I don't get this itolerable hatred of Chelsea. Putin and RA yes. But outside of that and prior to that their fans knew they were crap. Know how lucky they have been and I never had an issue with their fans inside and outside of stadiums. We loved them when Gerrard slipped and now they are public enemy no 1. I mean we have billionaires on board who could have any number of skeletons. Could be total animals away from camera. I just don't get it!
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 11 Mar 22 4.37pm

I don't get this itolerable hatred of Chelsea.
Putin and RA yes. But outside of that and prior to that their fans knew they were crap. Know how lucky they have been and I never had an issue with their fans inside and outside of stadiums. We loved them when Gerrard slipped and now they are public enemy no 1. I mean we have billionaires on board who could have any number of skeletons. Could be total animals away from camera. I just don't get it!

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 11 of 17 < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Abramovic sanctioned

Site Map

Sponsors