You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > Abramovic sanctioned
April 25 2024 2.58am

Abramovic sanctioned

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 14 of 17 < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 >

 

View Henry of Peckham's Profile Henry of Peckham Flag Eton Mess 12 Mar 22 3.50pm Send a Private Message to Henry of Peckham Add Henry of Peckham as a friend

Originally posted by chris123

Do you believe Abramovich should have been sanctioned?

I don't think AB should ever have been allowed to plough millions into Chelsea in the first place ... he can be sanctioned for all the perceived well intended reasons but putting Chelski out of business is not going to help Ukraine.

Oh dear, I can't buy a Chelski shirt because the club shop is not allowed to sell them! (duh)

 


Denial is not just a river in Egypt

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 12 Mar 22 4.07pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

He was kicked out four years ago when his visa expired and we refused to renew it. He then became an Israeli citizen but didn't return to the UK until a few months ago

He is now subject to a travel ban, so his Israeli and Portuguese passports won’t get him in

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View chris123's Profile chris123 Flag hove actually 12 Mar 22 4.09pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Originally posted by Henry of Peckham

I don't think AB should ever have been allowed to plough millions into Chelsea in the first place ... he can be sanctioned for all the perceived well intended reasons but putting Chelski out of business is not going to help Ukraine.

Oh dear, I can't buy a Chelski shirt because the club shop is not allowed to sell them! (duh)

That's not how sanctions work though.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View sydtheeagle's Profile sydtheeagle Flag England 12 Mar 22 4.17pm Send a Private Message to sydtheeagle Add sydtheeagle as a friend

Originally posted by Henry of Peckham

Chelsea have been very successful because of all the money AB has pumped into them ... FACT. I just don't see how hitting them with Government sanctions and potentially destroying the football club helps Ukraine?

Question wasn't directed at me, but I'll try to answer.

After the demise of the Soviet Union (initially under Yeltsin) virtually all the Russian state assets (mainly natural resources - oil, gas, infrastructure like telecoms, banking, etc.) were plundered by what became the first generation of oligarchs. "Plundered" as in given away (or sold off, as you prefer) by the state to a coterie of friendly influencers in exchange for favour.

After Putin took over, he demanded fealty from the oligarchs if they wanted to maintain their status/wealth. Some opposed him and were summarily dealt with (nb: Salisbury) or stripped of their wealth and exiled/imprisoned. Others continued to blow him, in order to maintain their wealth (eg: Abramovich). So the present generation of oligarchs are essentially Putin's puppets.

There are two salient facts for the sanctions: 1. That wealth actually belongs to the Russian people, from whom it was stolen and to whom it should be returned (would you be happy if Boris gave all the right to North Sea Oil to Mike Ashley and said "cash in and enrich yourself, bro"?), and 2. The present generation of oligarchs jumps when Putin says jump. It's ludicrous to presume they're not propping up his regime financially, and most likely directly or indirectly funding his wars. Thus, by stripping the oligarchs of their assets, money which to all intents and purposes is directly at Putin's disposal, his ability to prosecute the war against Ukraine is greatly diminished.

The fact that Chelsea is a football club and therefore higher profile than some of the other frozen assets is neither here nor there. Chelsea is simply a business caught in the crossfire of a just and sensible sanctioning policy. If the warmaker has his ability to buy weapons and therefore to continue the war curtailed, and if the result of his war-making is the destruction of his own country's economy as a result of the sanctions then it stands to reason that sooner or later the war will end because his own people, and hopefully the oligarchs themselves, will turn against him.

All of this very much helps Ukraine. Right now, the sanctions are probably the best chance of peace they've got.

Edited by sydtheeagle (12 Mar 2022 4.19pm)

 


Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 12 Mar 22 4.33pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by Henry of Peckham

What is YOUR problem? Chelsea have been very successful because of all the money AB has pumped into them ... FACT. I just don't see how hitting them with Government sanctions and potentially destroying the football club helps Ukraine? Maybe you have a one liner to answer that ... or should I buy a Chelsea shirt (duh!).

IMO the reasoning behind these sanctions worldwide ( not just the UK) is to, hopefully, get these mega Rich oligarchs ( crooks) to put pressure on Putin. I may be totally wrong.
With regard to RA, I agree it should never have been allowed for him to hive his ill-gotten gains into Chelsea, but it was, not government decision but PL.
If posters stopped trying to score Political points, sanctions may be a way of helping Ukraine ( see my reasons above).
Do I have sympathy for Chelsea fans? Absolutely not. Would they support other clubs in similar situations, absolutely not.
Do I have sympathy for Chelsea FC? Absolutely not. They have poached players for years, offering over inflated salaries and loaning out copious amount of players, just to make money.
Rant over

Edited by Spiderman (12 Mar 2022 4.34pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Henry of Peckham's Profile Henry of Peckham Flag Eton Mess 12 Mar 22 4.45pm Send a Private Message to Henry of Peckham Add Henry of Peckham as a friend

Originally posted by sydtheeagle

Question wasn't directed at me, but I'll try to answer.

After the demise of the Soviet Union (initially under Yeltsin) virtually all the Russian state assets (mainly natural resources - oil, gas, infrastructure like telecoms, banking, etc.) were plundered by what became the first generation of oligarchs. "Plundered" as in given away (or sold off, as you prefer) by the state to a coterie of friendly influencers in exchange for favour.

After Putin took over, he demanded fealty from the oligarchs if they wanted to maintain their status/wealth. Some opposed him and were summarily dealt with (nb: Salisbury) or stripped of their wealth and exiled/imprisoned. Others continued to blow him, in order to maintain their wealth (eg: Abramovich). So the present generation of oligarchs are essentially Putin's puppets.

There are two salient facts for the sanctions: 1. That wealth actually belongs to the Russian people, from whom it was stolen and to whom it should be returned (would you be happy if Boris gave all the right to North Sea Oil to Mike Ashley and said "cash in and enrich yourself, bro"?), and 2. The present generation of oligarchs jumps when Putin says jump. It's ludicrous to presume they're not propping up his regime financially, and most likely directly or indirectly funding his wars. Thus, by stripping the oligarchs of their assets, money which to all intents and purposes is directly at Putin's disposal, his ability to prosecute the war against Ukraine is greatly diminished.

The fact that Chelsea is a football club and therefore higher profile than some of the other frozen assets is neither here nor there. Chelsea is simply a business caught in the crossfire of a just and sensible sanctioning policy. If the warmaker has his ability to buy weapons and therefore to continue the war curtailed, and if the result of his war-making is the destruction of his own country's economy as a result of the sanctions then it stands to reason that sooner or later the war will end because his own people, and hopefully the oligarchs themselves, will turn against him.

All of this very much helps Ukraine. Right now, the sanctions are probably the best chance of peace they've got.

Edited by sydtheeagle (12 Mar 2022 4.19pm)

Thank you for that lucid explanation.

However, will the oligarchs turn against Putin? ... of course not they have too much to lose and will Chelski go out of business? ... I very much doubt it as they are part of a competitive Premier League dripping with money because of teams like them.

Putin currently sits on top of a very strong power base but as we've seen before, the ultimate power lies with the Russian people. They will have to ignore the bulls*** they are fed and overcome the bullying by his thugs. I hope it's sooner rather than later but it clearly is the longterm solution.

 


Denial is not just a river in Egypt

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Nicholas91's Profile Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 12 Mar 22 4.58pm Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

IMO the reasoning behind these sanctions worldwide ( not just the UK) is to, hopefully, get these mega Rich oligarchs ( crooks) to put pressure on Putin. I may be totally wrong.
With regard to RA, I agree it should never have been allowed for him to hive his ill-gotten gains into Chelsea, but it was, not government decision but PL.
If posters stopped trying to score Political points, sanctions may be a way of helping Ukraine ( see my reasons above).
Do I have sympathy for Chelsea fans? Absolutely not. Would they support other clubs in similar situations, absolutely not.
Do I have sympathy for Chelsea FC? Absolutely not. They have poached players for years, offering over inflated salaries and loaning out copious amount of players, just to make money.
Rant over

Edited by Spiderman (12 Mar 2022 4.34pm)

I wouldn't considered that a rant. I think it's a decent articulation of your viewpoint which is very similarly aligned to mine.

I recognise my endorsement here may be harmful to the reputation of your post and strength of the stance however so apologise in advance for any negative repercussions!

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Midlands Eagle's Profile Midlands Eagle Flag 12 Mar 22 5.54pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Henry of Peckham

Putin currently sits on top of a very strong power base but as we've seen before, the ultimate power lies with the Russian people. They will have to ignore the bulls*** they are fed and overcome the bullying by his thugs. I hope it's sooner rather than later but it clearly is the longterm solution.

Easier said than done as PooTin now controls all of the media and it seems that most Russians believe that they are seeing and hearing the truth on the state controlled media

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 12 Mar 22 6.02pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

IMO the reasoning behind these sanctions worldwide ( not just the UK) is to, hopefully, get these mega Rich oligarchs ( crooks) to put pressure on Putin. I may be totally wrong.
With regard to RA, I agree it should never have been allowed for him to hive his ill-gotten gains into Chelsea, but it was, not government decision but PL.
If posters stopped trying to score Political points, sanctions may be a way of helping Ukraine ( see my reasons above).
Do I have sympathy for Chelsea fans? Absolutely not. Would they support other clubs in similar situations, absolutely not.
Do I have sympathy for Chelsea FC? Absolutely not. They have poached players for years, offering over inflated salaries and loaning out copious amount of players, just to make money.
Rant over

Edited by Spiderman (12 Mar 2022 4.34pm)

That's how i see it, 1m people marched against the Iraq war and Blair just ignored them. There are several thousand war protestors in Moscow, good luck to them but they wont make a difference until every city is ground to a halt.

What is more likely is the money men tell Putin to fix it or they will get the army to oust him.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 12 Mar 22 8.18pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Henry of Peckham

I don't think AB should ever have been allowed to plough millions into Chelsea in the first place ... he can be sanctioned for all the perceived well intended reasons but putting Chelski out of business is not going to help Ukraine.

Oh dear, I can't buy a Chelski shirt because the club shop is not allowed to sell them! (duh)

AB should ever have been allowed to plough millions into Chelsea in the first place I agree with. Doing it now is no bad thing for whatever reason.

Chelsea are not going to be put out of business so need to get upset. They just won’t be buying titles if the new owner will not bankroll hundreds of millions of pounds in losses every year, and that’s with FFP being broken. Something Man City manage to cheat and I’m sure Newcastle will to keep the premier league bosses rich.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View sydtheeagle's Profile sydtheeagle Flag England 12 Mar 22 8.47pm Send a Private Message to sydtheeagle Add sydtheeagle as a friend

Originally posted by Henry of Peckham

However, will the oligarchs turn against Putin? ... of course not they have too much to lose and will Chelski go out of business? ... I very much doubt it

On the second point, you are right; Chelsea will not go out of business (and it is not the intention of the sanctions that they should go out of business). They will operate under restrictive conditions for a few months, then be sold to a new owner and business as usual (more or less) will resume.

On the first point, while none of us knows whether the oligarchs will turn against Putin, you are over-confident in suggesting there is no chance of that happening. If it becomes clear that Putin is running out of road (and there are various different ways it's possible we'll arrive at that juncture), they will turn against him rapidly. We're not at that point yet, but it's not impossible we'll get there. The oligarchs are, first and foremost, loyal to their money. If Putin is weakened enough, their loyalty to their money will triumph over their loyalty to him. Presently, though, as I said we're not at that point. One of the purposes of the sanctions is to get us there.

 


Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 12 Mar 22 8.53pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Sanctions like this are just ridiculous, do nothing for the people of Ukraine, and could not possibly have any affect on Russia.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 14 of 17 < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > Abramovic sanctioned