I so wish I could put you in contact with the climate scientist I knew more than 20 years ago. She would have been able to convince you that you are wrong, of that I am 100% certain. She knew it is true. She had the stats, and was one of our leading people interpreting them. She had no interest in, or influence from, politicians. She was the least money motivated person I have ever known, lived simply, worked all hours and was dedicated to the truth and nothing else.

This level of climate change is not a natural variation. It is man made and the result of the pace of industrialisation.

If we fail to deal with it, our grandchildren will suffer all the pain imaginable. We need to suffer some of that pain now, to protect them. It has nothing to do with people seeking profit, although some will profit. The profit motive being the best driver of action. We are steering the direction.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I suspect people would take it more seriously - even jump right on board with it - if they saw the government and companies being proactive. This has been mooted for years and it's pretty obvious where I live, and in Britain, that we could have renewable energy coming out of ears, from the sea and from rivers, wind and solar power. Instead, governments have done nothing and are just charging people extra tax money. That money isn't doing anything either except the usual.
We could be net zero anytime we wanted. We don't make anything. We barely have factories. The river where I live would easily power the city and wouldn't even be expensive. It could easily be done in an environmentally sensitive way. It used to power the factories that produced a large part of Britain's WWI munitions - now nothing, some rich American anglers. Solar would be problematic but wind and sea (we're on the coast) would also power the rest of the country.
You have to come to the conclusion that this is a money racket as there are no large scale plans to go renewable. Just plans to hike prices, tax more or limit people. No wonder people are fed up with this.
Anyone take a look around for five minutes and see where your power could come from. It really isn't rocket science - the technology all exists. Then look at what's happening. The sum total of nothing except taxes and higher charges.

Red and Blue Army!

You have good points. The solar panels currently and the grants are a joke. We could all have small turbines - they don't have to be expensive. We could use the power of our down pipes, sewers and gutters too. Particularly storm drains - yet nothing.
However, speak out about it, as you say, and get cancelled. I can tell you quite categorically that currently in academic circles your research has to be cutting edge woke - or you won't get funded. I've left academia as I just couldn't handle the arse licking and false research anymore. Actually, the final straw was Covid. I was asked to retrain without any pay, for a job I already did. So I'm a former intelligentsia, now dumb - I don't even bother as a sideline anymore. Although I do read the odd book.
I teach in the community now.

Red and Blue Army!

Round we go again.

[Link]

Andrew Tate is a mixed character for me.

What he says here is true as in the downgrade for the majority since the time of the boomers....the modern slave point - minus the previous freedoms all enacted by leaders who present themselves as bettering lives.

However, these points are well known on the dissident right and he's just repackaging them for normies looking for a masculine leader.

The problem with Tate is that he's someone who himself exploits for gain....so while I think he has muscular ideology for men, some of which I think is needed....he himself probably isn't the best figure to give it.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Yes, she could explain all of those things. The contribution from natural variation is well understood and monitored. The various contributions from human activity is as well. That the press concentrates on one area, and not another, doesn't mean the scientists do. Unless you are one of those scientists, you are not qualified to make judgements. You say you have concerns. I know my old contact would completely allay those concerns. You seem convinced that this is all a devious plan by business and governments to exploit fear and gain control. I am 100% sure it isn't, because my contact convinced me.

Cynicism can sometimes be sensible, but it can also be dangerous.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.