They don't get anyone in their changing rooms! They might get transgendered women in some shared spaces, but not in the personal ones.

The real crux of the matter is the thinking that someone who has transgendered hasn't actually changed.

Once again anyone who has completely transgendered can go where they like but before they have they should stick to their own changing rooms regardless of how they feel. Why is that contentious?

And what about the women's emotions?

Absolutely agree.

For me there is a very important distinction between looking at any circumstance and doing what is objectively best for the individual(s) and society or caving into every notion, based under a guise of social freedom or 'progressiveness' (ludicrous), which will often be hijacked by those whose ends are entirely selfish, anti-social, completely logic defying or anything more macabre. Those who ignorantly but willingly go along with people who fall into this category are just as culpable in my eyes... 'I was just doing my job'.

For me, allowing some sort of transgender movement which seeks to secure a place in legislation carte blanche and even at the expense of the rest of society based solely on subjective (and often nuts) opinions and aforementioned intents is as ludicrous as completely demonising alongside Soviet/Nazi style purging or persecution of any group within society.

The lack of 'common sense' approaches to just about everything these days is far more worrying for me than the outcomes themselves.

There we have it, in all its subjective, prejudiced glory.

Degeneracy is defined by the OED as "​moral standards that have fallen to a level that is very low and unacceptable to most people."

To believe that those who discover that they have been born into the wrong body are degenerate is to demonstrate a complete misapplication of the term.

To believe that transgenders lack moral standards is to demonstrate total ignorance of them.

These people are not indulging in anti-moral behaviour. They aren't paedophiles, wife-swappers or exhibitionists. That anyone classifies them in the same way, is pretty obnoxious and demonstrates a much lower morality than anything a transgender is likely to do.

To then go on and make a remark about the need to protect the young and vulnerable, when everyone believes that to be necessary, including the transgender community, simply attempts to add a further smear.

Sometimes the level of irrational, unrealistic prejudice to be found in these pages surprises even me. I know some still hold to Victorian values, but these are back to almost the stone age in their thinking.

How do you know they don't have any of those traits? Not because they're transgender but because they're human beings so just as susceptible and flawed as anyone else. Gender dimorphism doesn't elevate anyone to a higher moral plane.