You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Starmer's dozen refusals to answer simple question
May 20 2024 7.01am

Starmer's dozen refusals to answer simple question

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

 

View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 07 Mar 23 2.54pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Are you saying that he's a w@nker

That's a little hard to avoid.

That is what one would probably call unconscious bias or a Freudian slip.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (07 Mar 2023 2.58pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View palace99's Profile palace99 Flag New Mills 07 Mar 23 4.10pm Send a Private Message to palace99 Add palace99 as a friend

Originally posted by HKOwen

Starmer neither knows what a woman is or is willing to state when he first started discussing a job with Sue Gray.

Two facts.

If he doesn't want to answer there should be a compelling reason

The 2nd point is quite simple.

He has offered SG a job - she has yet to start.

It is for SG to inform her current employer, not Starmer, therefore he refused to get involved.

Incidentally i speak to many people and often say let me know if/when you are interested in discussing a new job/role.
I'm just putting an idea out there - it is not a formal job offer.
I suspect it only got serious when Case blocked her for a senior role a few weeks back.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View palace99's Profile palace99 Flag New Mills 07 Mar 23 4.15pm Send a Private Message to palace99 Add palace99 as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

This is obviously dodgy.

You don't resign from one job and immediately start another unless it was agreed beforehand.

We lost an elected Prime Minister because of his so called dishonesty, and yet the very opposition who cheered that on are already showing their colours.

It doesn't matter if this woman was actually neutral or not. It is the principle that has to be seen to be upheld.

Labour are pissing on that and hoping no one will notice because of the Matt Handcock effect.

She hasn't started or even accepted a new job. At present she has been offered a new job. If she accepts it she will need to work gardening leave.

Not sure how this is different from (now Lord) David Frost being appointed by Johnson's govt

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View The Dolphin's Profile The Dolphin Flag 07 Mar 23 9.49pm Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

Originally posted by beak

He will answer all questions once elected as P.M.. At least he hasn't put his dubious Father up for A knighthood.

The optics may not be good but check what Stanley has done first before you shout.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View The Dolphin's Profile The Dolphin Flag 07 Mar 23 9.51pm Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

Originally posted by palace99

She hasn't started or even accepted a new job. At present she has been offered a new job. If she accepts it she will need to work gardening leave.

Not sure how this is different from (now Lord) David Frost being appointed by Johnson's govt

Frost was the Brexit negotiator.
Very different to a parties C of S!!!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 08 Mar 23 12.53pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Originally posted by The Dolphin

The optics may not be good but check what Stanley has done first before you shout.

Knocked his missus about and groped a few aides?

On the topic; it's so obvious Starmer has approached SG before she finished the report and that interview trying to avoid that reality is the sort of crap which would fit right in with the current government - a poor politician who's only principle seems to be getting elected.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Mar 23 12.57pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by The Dolphin

The optics may not be good but check what Stanley has done first before you shout.

I watched him on the Chase last night. He won his round but didn't win anything ultimately.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View dreamwaverider's Profile dreamwaverider Flag London 08 Mar 23 3.12pm Send a Private Message to dreamwaverider Add dreamwaverider as a friend

Originally posted by HKOwen

Starmer neither knows what a woman is or is willing to state when he first started discussing a job with Sue Gray.

Two facts.

If he doesn't want to answer there should be a compelling reason

In my opinion he was blatantly lying which nowadays is par for the course for all politicians. Facial expression and repeatedly refusing to answer the question re Sue Grey original contact re job says it all.

Pathetic stance by Starmer. A weak woke.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View eritheagle's Profile eritheagle Flag Erith 08 Mar 23 3.49pm Send a Private Message to eritheagle Add eritheagle as a friend

Originally posted by beak

He will answer all questions once elected as P.M.. At least he hasn't put his dubious Father up for A knighthood.

No, just dubiously managed to get one himself!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 08 Mar 23 4.11pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by eritheagle

No, just dubiously managed to get one himself!

But apparently insists on not using Sir in the HOC

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 08 Mar 23 4.14pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

Knocked his missus about and groped a few aides?

On the topic; it's so obvious Starmer has approached SG before she finished the report and that interview trying to avoid that reality is the sort of crap which would fit right in with the current government - a poor politician who's only principle seems to be getting elected.

But as a Senior Civil Servant she should be totally impartial, politically-wise, , wasshe?. She was duty bound to have reported any contact, which she did not comply with. I wonder what Labour would say if the boot was on the other foot?

Edited by Spiderman (08 Mar 2023 4.24pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 08 Mar 23 4.58pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

But as a Senior Civil Servant she should be totally impartial, politically-wise, , wasshe?. She was duty bound to have reported any contact, which she did not comply with. I wonder what Labour would say if the boot was on the other foot?

Edited by Spiderman (08 Mar 2023 4.24pm)

Tories out, we need an election, blah blah I guess

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Starmer's dozen refusals to answer simple question