Well tell us how you feel about Frank then.

Anyway he's full of sh1t. He did lie. It's a fact he lied to the fans via the training ground interview and don't you think it's a little far fetched the agreement with parish was to go full steam ahead but tell the fans the complete opposite.

Don't tell me I don't know what I'm talking about. It's pretty obvious some of the cr&p that's gone on. They're all at fault but Frank isn't the club, just someone using us but not very good or clever at doing so. He's gone. Who cares? We were a stepping stone. If he did fail some of the whiners on here were actually prepared for him to take us down. Thank god they don't get their wishes to watch losing sideways passing football on their laptops whilst us fans attending have to suffer their utopia.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (15 Sep 2017 9.39am)

COYP

You have accused people on here of being deliberately obtuse ? seeing as you have chosen to completely ignore the context of those games I can only assume you are yourself being "obtuse"

Just in case you really do believe what you have written allow me please to add the context.

BFS came into our club and immediately stated the players "were not fit enough" and that it would take until at least end of February/March before his methods would show dividends, and true to his word we became very hard to beat, and nothced up wins ahainst Liverpool, Chelsea, and Arsenal to name but a few, we played to our strengths and defended well, and attacked on the counter with pace and power.

So BFS unfcuked the squad from the state AP left them in, and got the best from them. Yes it took him a while BUT he made us all aware before hand. BFS left us in a good place.

FDB comes in Changes everything overnight, contrary to his outward intentions. And we are changed overnight from a balanced strong counter attacking team, to a powderpuff, feckless bunch of clowns who clearly didn't have a fcukin igloo what they were doing.

FDB took us backwards from where we were. No goals scored 7 goals conceded. So back to my original statement, IF WE STILL HAD BFS against Huddersfield, Swansea, Burnley and Liverpool, having had even longer to instill his way, and the additions we made it is a fair assumption we would not have lost to at least three of those clubs.

"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Kelly and Delaney were our CBs that day v Burnley.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (15 Sep 2017 10.36am)

COYP

I think if we'd played 4 at the back we'd have given ourselves a good chance of at least 4 points and he might still be in the job. But you noticed it sounded he wasn't for turning and later the 3-4-3 sounded in his plans. He just didn't want to put us before 'his' project to show what he could do. The board didn't want to gamble us for his benefit.

COYP

Frank didn't have one and ruined and/or didn't want Luka. I actually wonder how much knowledge he had on our players when he joined and 2 weeks before he left. Sammy was there for answers but looking at the 3 on the bench, Orlando Trustfull was a better man at the time to confer with.

COYP

So you are either being obtuse in order to try and validate your (wrong) opinion or you know nothing of our games.

We had Delaney and Kelly as the center back pairing that game, and if memory serves, their Keeper got away with blue murder for flattening Wilf, only for Wilf to be incorrectly called off side. Then in the second half, he got hacked down in thier box, and as replays showed, a penalty was the correct decision, but we didn't get it.

It's your argument that's nonsense mate no one else's

"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"