Grooming Gangs + Tommy Robinson Thread

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 4 of 470 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

cryrst The garden of England 14 Dec 17 1.07pm
Originally posted by nickgusset If you listen to the interview it will answer the white girl thing for you. How f***ing dare you call me an apologist for rapists. Take that back. No I didn't specify The thing I see was that your reply prior to mine didn't start with yeh that's totally wrong that Muslim gangs are abusing white kids You just went straight on the defence by making comparisons with other people grooming. The evidence was there and you couldn't bring yourself to admit it is happening in those communities.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 14 Dec 17 1.07pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

If you listen to the interview it will answer the white girl thing for you.

How f***ing dare you call me an apologist for rapists. Take that back.

No I didn't specify
The thing I see was that your reply prior to mine didn't start with yeh that's totally wrong that Muslim gangs are abusing white kids
You just went straight on the defence by making comparisons with other people grooming.
The evidence was there and you couldn't bring yourself to admit it is happening in those communities.

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 14 Dec 17 1.24pm
Originally posted by cryrst No I didn't specify The thing I see was that your reply prior to mine didn't start with yeh that's totally wrong that Muslim gangs are abusing white kids You just went straight on the defence by making comparisons with other people grooming. The evidence was there and you couldn't bring yourself to admit it is happening in those communities. Why haven't you condemned the 15-20% of grooming gangs/abusers that aren't Asian ethnics/possibly muslims? I'd hurry if I were you before you accuse yourself of being an apologist. Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 14 Dec 17 1.24pm

Originally posted by cryrst

Why haven't you condemned the 15-20% of grooming gangs/abusers that aren't Asian ethnics/possibly muslims? I'd hurry if I were you before you accuse yourself of being an apologist.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50 Croydon 14 Dec 17 1.28pm
Originally posted by Kermit8 Why haven't you condemned the 15-20% of grooming gangs/abusers that aren't Asian ethnics/possibly muslims? I'd hurry if I were you before you accuse yourself of being an apologist. I guess with the all the beards and stuff, Muslims get involved a lot more in grooming than us infidels. We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 14 Dec 17 1.28pm

Originally posted by Kermit8

Why haven't you condemned the 15-20% of grooming gangs/abusers that aren't Asian ethnics/possibly muslims? I'd hurry if I were you before you accuse yourself of being an apologist.

I guess with the all the beards and stuff, Muslims get involved a lot more in grooming than us infidels.

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 14 Dec 17 2.08pm
Originally posted by Kermit8 Why haven't you condemned the 15-20% of grooming gangs/abusers that aren't Asian ethnics/possibly muslims? I'd hurry if I were you before you accuse yourself of being an apologist. Because 85% of people are White and yet still make up a small proportion of rape gangs while only 4% are Muslim and have been mostly responsible for all of the recent mass rape in numerous towns. Hello!
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

14 Dec 17 2.08pm

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by Kermit8

Why haven't you condemned the 15-20% of grooming gangs/abusers that aren't Asian ethnics/possibly muslims? I'd hurry if I were you before you accuse yourself of being an apologist.

Because 85% of people are White and yet still make up a small proportion of rape gangs while only 4% are Muslim and have been mostly responsible for all of the recent mass rape in numerous towns.

Hello!

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 2.49pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Because 85% of people are White and yet still make up a small proportion of rape gangs while only 4% are Muslim and have been mostly responsible for all of the recent mass rape in numerous towns. Hello! Funny, white people are in paedophile rings rather than gangs. Is there any difference for the victims? Paedophile ring jailed for 'terrifying depravity' - [Link] It seems that Asians operate in a different way working in gangs as opposed to online grooming or communicating. Looking at all cases of paedophile convictions, it seems Asians make up about 8% [Link] figures from 2010 The Asian population of the uk at the last census was around 7% so not a marked difference, which is completely different to what a lot of people claim. So yes, all sex crimes against children are wrong, but because I point out that people are over emphasising the percentage of Muslims that are paedo scrum, I'm an apologist. Just cements my impression that some people are more obsessed by the perpetrators and not the crime, especially if they're brown.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 2.49pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Because 85% of people are White and yet still make up a small proportion of rape gangs while only 4% are Muslim and have been mostly responsible for all of the recent mass rape in numerous towns.

Hello!

Funny, white people are in paedophile rings rather than gangs. Is there any difference for the victims?

Paedophile ring jailed for 'terrifying depravity' - [Link]

It seems that Asians operate in a different way working in gangs as opposed to online grooming or communicating.

Looking at all cases of paedophile convictions, it seems Asians make up about 8% [Link] figures from 2010
The Asian population of the uk at the last census was around 7% so not a marked difference, which is completely different to what a lot of people claim.

So yes, all sex crimes against children are wrong, but because I point out that people are over emphasising the percentage of Muslims that are paedo scrum, I'm an apologist.

Just cements my impression that some people are more obsessed by the perpetrators and not the crime, especially if they're brown.

Alert a moderator to this post

johnfirewall 14 Dec 17 2.57pm
Originally posted by nickgusset Funny, white people are in paedophile rings rather than gangs. Is there any difference for the victims? Paedophile ring jailed for 'terrifying depravity' - [Link] It seems that Asians operate in a different way working in gangs as opposed to online grooming or communicating. Looking at all cases of paedophile convictions, it seems Asians make up about 8% [Link] figures from 2010 The Asian population of the uk at the last census was around 7% so not a marked difference, which is completely different to what a lot of people claim. So yes, all sex crimes against children are wrong, but because I point out that people are over emphasising the percentage of Muslims that are paedo scrum, I'm an apologist. Just cements my impression that some people are more obsessed by the perpetrators and not the crime, especially if they're brown. The fact is they got away with it under the cloak of racial sensitivity, while the whites escape under a cassock. Online recruitment is definitely the modus operandi for radicalisation. Of course it applies to this type of offense too.
Alert a moderator to this post

johnfirewall

14 Dec 17 2.57pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

Funny, white people are in paedophile rings rather than gangs. Is there any difference for the victims?

Paedophile ring jailed for 'terrifying depravity' - [Link]

It seems that Asians operate in a different way working in gangs as opposed to online grooming or communicating.

So yes, all sex crimes against children are wrong, but because I point out that people are over emphasising the percentage of Muslims that are paedo scrum, I'm an apologist.

Just cements my impression that some people are more obsessed by the perpetrators and not the crime, especially if they're brown.

The fact is they got away with it under the cloak of racial sensitivity, while the whites escape under a cassock.

Online recruitment is definitely the modus operandi for radicalisation. Of course it applies to this type of offense too.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 14 Dec 17 3.03pm
Originally posted by nickgusset Funny, white people are in paedophile rings rather than gangs. Is there any difference for the victims? Paedophile ring jailed for 'terrifying depravity' - [Link] It seems that Asians operate in a different way working in gangs as opposed to online grooming or communicating. Looking at all cases of paedophile convictions, it seems Asians make up about 8% [Link] figures from 2010 The Asian population of the uk at the last census was around 7% so not a marked difference, which is completely different to what a lot of people claim. So yes, all sex crimes against children are wrong, but because I point out that people are over emphasising the percentage of Muslims that are paedo scrum, I'm an apologist. Just cements my impression that some people are more obsessed by the perpetrators and not the crime, especially if they're brown. Are you serious? That example is seven men from two years ago. The data is from 2007 before any of this was exposed. Sex offences are numerous in type but grooming gangs are hugely disproportionately Muslim. Why do you find it so hard to accept, he said knowingly. Isn't it more important to stop these f***ers than whine about Muslim bashing? Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Dec 2017 3.03pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

14 Dec 17 3.03pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

Funny, white people are in paedophile rings rather than gangs. Is there any difference for the victims?

Paedophile ring jailed for 'terrifying depravity' - [Link]

It seems that Asians operate in a different way working in gangs as opposed to online grooming or communicating.

So yes, all sex crimes against children are wrong, but because I point out that people are over emphasising the percentage of Muslims that are paedo scrum, I'm an apologist.

Just cements my impression that some people are more obsessed by the perpetrators and not the crime, especially if they're brown.

Are you serious?

That example is seven men from two years ago.
The data is from 2007 before any of this was exposed.

Sex offences are numerous in type but grooming gangs are hugely disproportionately Muslim.

Why do you find it so hard to accept, he said knowingly.
Isn't it more important to stop these f***ers than whine about Muslim bashing?

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Dec 2017 3.03pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 14 Dec 17 3.23pm
Originally posted by Kermit8 Why haven't you condemned the 15-20% of grooming gangs/abusers that aren't Asian ethnics/possibly muslims? I'd hurry if I were you before you accuse yourself of being an apologist. There you are Kermit 20% are white or non ethnic as you say. But if only 17% of the UK is non indigenous then look at the proportions. And yes I'd gladly Rip the f***g head off of all of them and st down their neck. Then stamp all over what's left. With pleasure and no remorse as they don't show any. Give me 5 minutes alone with any of them I'd be doing a twenty.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 14 Dec 17 3.23pm

Originally posted by Kermit8

Why haven't you condemned the 15-20% of grooming gangs/abusers that aren't Asian ethnics/possibly muslims? I'd hurry if I were you before you accuse yourself of being an apologist.

There you are Kermit
20% are white or non ethnic as you say.
But if only 17% of the UK is non indigenous then look at the proportions.
And yes I'd gladly Rip the f*****g head off of all of them and s**t down their neck.
Then stamp all over what's left.
With pleasure and no remorse as they don't show any.
Give me 5 minutes alone with any of them I'd be doing a twenty.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 4.39pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Are you serious? That example is seven men from two years ago. The data is from 2007 before any of this was exposed. Sex offences are numerous in type but grooming gangs are hugely disproportionately Muslim. Why do you find it so hard to accept, he said knowingly. Isn't it more important to stop these f***ers than whine about Muslim bashing? Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Dec 2017 3.03pm) Yes grooming gangs are mainly Muslims and paedophile rings are mainly white. But you don't see pages and pages about how whites should sort out their obvious problem with paedophile rings. As the links in my last post show, across all paedophile crimes , Muslim / Asian perpetrators are at 7%, which is roughly in line with the current population. The data is centred around the time of the last census.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 4.39pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Are you serious?

That example is seven men from two years ago.
The data is from 2007 before any of this was exposed.

Sex offences are numerous in type but grooming gangs are hugely disproportionately Muslim.

Why do you find it so hard to accept, he said knowingly.
Isn't it more important to stop these f***ers than whine about Muslim bashing?

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Dec 2017 3.03pm)

Yes grooming gangs are mainly Muslims and paedophile rings are mainly white. But you don't see pages and pages about how whites should sort out their obvious problem with paedophile rings.

As the links in my last post show, across all paedophile crimes , Muslim / Asian perpetrators are at 7%, which is roughly in line with the current population.

The data is centred around the time of the last census.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 4.40pm
Originally posted by johnfirewall The fact is they got away with it under the cloak of racial sensitivity, while the whites escape under a cassock. Online recruitment is definitely the modus operandi for radicalisation. Of course it applies to this type of offense too. Yep, all those pictures of starving dogs on Facebook that people liked turned out to be a Britain First recruitment tool.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 4.40pm

Originally posted by johnfirewall

The fact is they got away with it under the cloak of racial sensitivity, while the whites escape under a cassock.

Online recruitment is definitely the modus operandi for radicalisation. Of course it applies to this type of offense too.

Yep, all those pictures of starving dogs on Facebook that people liked turned out to be a Britain First recruitment tool.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 4.47pm
Originally posted by cryrst You are an apologist nick The evidence is there on the front page of all the red and black tops. Why do you always try to defend wronguns. This truly is a sad indictment of your thought process. And FYI I mentioned the race not the thread starter. Also seems strange that all the girls are white. Explain that then? Mods . Am I allowed to retort what I think this poster is an apologist for, based on a skewed interpretation of what he has posted. Or is insinuating things about posters still frowned upon. Just checking, thanks.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 4.47pm

Originally posted by cryrst

You are an apologist nick
The evidence is there on the front page of all the red and black tops.
Why do you always try to defend wronguns.
This truly is a sad indictment of your thought process.
And FYI I mentioned the race not the thread starter.
Also seems strange that all the girls are white.
Explain that then?

Mods . Am I allowed to retort what I think this poster is an apologist for, based on a skewed interpretation of what he has posted. Or is insinuating things about posters still frowned upon.
Just checking, thanks.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 14 Dec 17 4.53pm
Originally posted by nickgusset Mods . Am I allowed to retort what I think this poster is an apologist for, based on a skewed interpretation of what he has posted. Or is insinuating things about posters still frowned upon. Just checking, thanks. How on earth can you say this? You call people racist and have used most 'insult' labels I can think of. Don't be a hypocrite. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

14 Dec 17 4.53pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

How on earth can you say this?

You call people racist and have used most 'insult' labels I can think of.

Don't be a hypocrite.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 4 of 470 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Grooming Gangs + Tommy Robinson Thread

Site Map

Sponsors