Not so much - I was thinking more people who's relatives were transported as slaves, and live in countries where there is still significant racial inequality.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

So what is significant then.
Ask the girls if 1% is significant.
I'm sure that it is a lot lower than this but to the victims any amount.
It's the word you are discecting not looking at the issue.

As were talking criminology and sociology then it'd probably be Statistical Significance (wiki defines this as [Link]

The issue? I'm not one for focusing on specific instances of child sex offences, I find them all abhorant and in need of focus. Grooming gangs are a part of a much bigger issue

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

The scale of the crime by so called right wing ( you don't normally advocate left and right nick, maybe you've been on the juice) is nothing like the Islamist attacks. Mainly because the right wing is against one type of person or religion.
Islamist is against anyone who breathes and is in their way.
How can you not see a difference.
I got done for speeding over tower bridge 24 mph in a 20mph
Is this the same as 79mph in a 30mph.
With your logic it is
Both illegal yes but seriousness differs.
Cause and effect.

I disagree, whilst the threat to life from the Far Right is much lower, the degree to which it has the capacity to influence the UK way of life and democratic institutions is much higher. Far Right groups don't tend to 'claim responsibility' in the way that Islamist groups do - nor do they claim wide allegence.

As we saw with the NSU in Germany, a small independent, funded cell, operated for over a decade and resulted in a number of acts of political violence without even appearing on the law enforcement radar (or domestic security services).

Similarly, the UK police and anti-terrorist police, 'know' that Combat-18 in the UK has committed a number of murders, but have only ever managed to prove cases in terms of some internal disputes within the organisation.

That said, it would be unreasonable to consider that Far Right Terrorism is as major issue to security services as Islamist groups (notably related to Al-Qaeda affiliates and in support of IS).

The problem really, is that because the far right groups don't operate as openly, its very difficult to accurate determine whether something that has occurred is directly attributable to underground far right militants - and these groups tend to be far more sophisticated and entrenched in society - They don't have 'official memberships', and their members when arrested don't claim membership.

Far Right militants also don't have membership of established far right political groups, and usually have left when they became active. A common trend in those who commit actions of politicalised or racially motivated violence, is that they have a history among the far right, but no overt memberships.

Combat 18 has no official membership. Groups tend to be self organised, and affiliated - rather than a specific centralised organisation (similar to how Eco-Terrrorist and the Animal Liberation Front operate).

Also not all Islamist terrorism is aimed at us either - Only some of the Islamist groups are engaged in direct terrorism against the UK (indeed some Islamist groups, who are arguably terrorist groups, were fighting against IS in Syria - i.e. Shia Militias).

Its a complicated mess. But like Irish Republicianism, I don't think we can drop a focus on Islamist terrorism or Right Wing threats in the UK.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Spot on.

Whataboutery central.