You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > World Cup excited or not?
April 19 2024 9.57pm

World Cup excited or not?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 38 of 39 < 34 35 36 37 38 39 >

 

View FairweatherEagle's Profile FairweatherEagle Flag London 15 Jul 18 9.34pm Send a Private Message to FairweatherEagle Add FairweatherEagle as a friend

For a country with a population of 4 million Croatia gave them a bloody good game.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Pussay Patrol Flag 15 Jul 18 9.53pm

Not much point debating whether it was or was not a pen, it didn't make any difference to the result

I think Croatia saved their best performance for England, getting to the final was enough for them

 


Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 15 Jul 18 10.29pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Pussay Patrol

Not much point debating whether it was or was not a pen, it didn't make any difference to the result

I think Croatia saved their best performance for England, getting to the final was enough for them

You cannot say things like that because goals change games. France should never have been in front and France being in front definitely changes the game.

Also when people say they could’ve been 3 up instead of isn’t necessarily right because again, a goal changes the game and tactics.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View twist's Profile twist Flag Miami, Florida 16 Jul 18 12.23am Send a Private Message to twist Add twist as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

You cannot say things like that because goals change games. France should never have been in front and France being in front definitely changes the game.

Also when people say they could’ve been 3 up instead of isn’t necessarily right because again, a goal changes the game and tactics.

agreed. If it was level terms, Croatia would not have committed themselves so much, gifting France with more goals. Was a penalty though.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View twist's Profile twist Flag Miami, Florida 16 Jul 18 12.27am Send a Private Message to twist Add twist as a friend

and whilst on the subject. What was that during the medal ceremony, pours with rain and Putin and Infantino have an umbrella covering them immediately, but Kitarovi&#263; and Macron are both left to get drenched.

I was kind of hoping her top was seethru when wet though.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View YT's Profile YT Flag Oxford 16 Jul 18 5.15am Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

You cannot say things like that because goals change games. France should never have been in front and France being in front definitely changes the game.

Also when people say they could’ve been 3 up instead of isn’t necessarily right because again, a goal changes the game and tactics.

Agreed. ‘The Butterfly Effect’. Everything that happens influences what follows.

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Pussay Patrol Flag 16 Jul 18 6.22am

Originally posted by YT

Agreed. ‘The Butterfly Effect’. Everything that happens influences what follows.

Don't disagree but my main point is France were the better side at the end of the day and that pen decision was not crucial, Croatia can have no complaints. France would have still won, they soaked up the Croatia pressure and picked them off on the break

 


Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
michaelpearce Flag grays 16 Jul 18 6.46am

Well another world cup, over England looking at what might have been, but still a good show by them.
Well done Russia for a well run tournament,after all the fears there was none,
Not to many games you could say was exciting,England games aside,im not saying we was better than the others just the run to the semis was fun while it lasted,
Best 2 games for me was Portugal Spain and Belgium japan, the rest was more like a chess game,dont know how much the heat played apart,
So next world cup in a small country that heat is 120 in the shade good luck with that one

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Pussay Patrol Flag 16 Jul 18 7.46pm

Congratulations to Africa on winning the world cup

 


Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View kenbarr's Profile kenbarr Flag Jackson Heights, Queens, New York ... 17 Jul 18 12.47am Send a Private Message to kenbarr Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add kenbarr as a friend

Originally posted by Pussay Patrol

Congratulations to Africa on winning the world cup

In your own inimitable way, you are making a great point. Traditional European powers in football would be nowhere without player from former colonies. For France, it goes back to Zinedine Zidane through the present crop that includes Paul Pogba and Mbappe. For England, John Barnes and Cyrille Regis through Raheem Sterling. John Salako, before his crushing knee injury was a mainstay in the England lineup although he also qualified for Nigeria. They lost out on Wil because they dithered and he lost patience with them. Even Germany relies on immigrants and former colonials; Oezil, Boateng, etc. Wilf may be ahead of his time by choosing Cote d'Ivoire over England but the day is coming when players will loose patience with European countries and play for their heritage nations.

 


Divorced...And LOVING it!
VJRAM Rev.
CPFC since Boxing Day 1989 CPFC 2-2 CFC
Gregg Berhalter, US International & USMNT Head Coach
Jill Ellis, England International & Retired USWNT Head Coach
Trevor Francis, International PRAT

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 17 Jul 18 1.22am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by kenbarr

In your own inimitable way, you are making a great point. Traditional European powers in football would be nowhere without player from former colonies. For France, it goes back to Zinedine Zidane through the present crop that includes Paul Pogba and Mbappe. For England, John Barnes and Cyrille Regis through Raheem Sterling. John Salako, before his crushing knee injury was a mainstay in the England lineup although he also qualified for Nigeria. They lost out on Wil because they dithered and he lost patience with them. Even Germany relies on immigrants and former colonials; Oezil, Boateng, etc. Wilf may be ahead of his time by choosing Cote d'Ivoire over England but the day is coming when players will loose patience with European countries and play for their heritage nations.

Germany did fine before mass immigration and didn’t need colonialism to win World Cups. Neither did Italy or Spain more recently.

France need or benefit from African-French players because Rugby is the national sport and not football. But please don’t say European football or international teams are being propped up by African immigrants because that’s rubbish.

Croatia were really good apart from the first half v England and ironically a team full of ‘slavs’ Hitler would’ve preferred.

Your opinion is rubbish because Spain or Italy or Germany will win the World Cup again with an all white team. I don’t care but it’s true.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (17 Jul 2018 1.34am)

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View kenbarr's Profile kenbarr Flag Jackson Heights, Queens, New York ... 17 Jul 18 1.31am Send a Private Message to kenbarr Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add kenbarr as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Germany did fine before mass immigration and didn’t need colonialism to win World Cups. Neither did Italy or Spain more recently.

France need or benefit from African-French players because Rugby is the national sport and not football. But please don’t say European football or international teams are being propped up by African immigrants because that’s rubbish.

Well it's caught up to most of them. Italy and the Netherlands didn't qualify, Germany went out in the group stage and Spain in the round of 16. Better get a wider net to attract top class players for these countries. PS, one of the reason the USA didn't qualify was alienating youth development programs geared towards Central and South American immigrant players. A great prospect just slipped through our hands and is with Mexico.

 


Divorced...And LOVING it!
VJRAM Rev.
CPFC since Boxing Day 1989 CPFC 2-2 CFC
Gregg Berhalter, US International & USMNT Head Coach
Jill Ellis, England International & Retired USWNT Head Coach
Trevor Francis, International PRAT

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 38 of 39 < 34 35 36 37 38 39 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > World Cup excited or not?