Ref: Soton v Palace
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 the silurian  The garden of England.(not really) 01 Feb 19 7.54am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by becky
I'd just love to read the report on the 'forensic analysis' of Marriner's performance tonight. There isnt one there never has been and there never will be! All that 'forensic analysis'stuff is just a made up thing in an effort to deflect from the appalling refereeing that we have to endure every week, just to make you think the FA actually care about it!
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
 becky over the moon 01 Feb 19 8.53am |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
There isnt one there never has been and there never will be! All that 'forensic analysis'stuff is just a made up thing in an effort to deflect from the appalling refereeing that we have to endure every week, just to make you think the FA actually care about it! Sadly, we don't have a tongue-in-cheek smiley available on these boards...
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
chateauferret  01 Feb 19 12.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
There isnt one there never has been and there never will be! All that 'forensic analysis'stuff is just a made up thing in an effort to deflect from the appalling refereeing that we have to endure every week, just to make you think the FA actually care about it! I think even Willo has stopped believing this bulls*** now.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 01 Feb 19 1.01pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chateauferret
I stand 'Four square' behind all my previous comments. I refrain from partaking in threads pertaining to referees and refereeing decisions as history has shown they disintegrate into wearisome Willo threads and I feel that in general the HOL posters have had enough of them and HOL is much the better for their absence.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dreamwaverider Online London 01 Feb 19 1.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
What Im struggling with is How Prowses foul on Wilf just before the sending off went unnoticed. I mean what did the ref see different to a blatant foul ??? Had he given that then Wilf would not have had the confrontation with Prowse.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dreamwaverider Online London 01 Feb 19 1.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
What Im struggling with is How Prowses foul on Wilf just before the sending off went unnoticed. I mean what did the ref see different to a blatant foul ??? Had he given that then Wilf would not have had the confrontation with Prowse.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 01 Feb 19 1.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
I stand 'Four square' behind all my previous comments. I refrain from partaking in threads pertaining to referees and refereeing decisions as history has shown they disintegrate into wearisome Willo threads and I feel that in general the HOL posters have had enough of them and HOL is much the better for their absence. You mean you have no problem even with that truly shocking display?
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 01 Feb 19 1.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
I stand 'Four square' behind all my previous comments. I refrain from partaking in threads pertaining to referees and refereeing decisions as history has shown they disintegrate into wearisome Willo threads and I feel that in general the HOL posters have had enough of them and HOL is much the better for their absence. You were wrong with your previous comments, defending the indefensible BUT you're absolutely correct about us having had enough of it!! Edited by the silurian (01 Feb 2019 4.42pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Tickled pink Cornwall 01 Feb 19 4.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
What Im struggling with is How Prowses foul on Wilf just before the sending off went unnoticed. I mean what did the ref see different to a blatant foul ??? Had he given that then Wilf would not have had the confrontation with Prowse. Precisely, the thing dressed in black got it all wrong.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| A89M Streatham 01 Feb 19 5.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Tickled pink
Precisely, the thing dressed in black got it all wrong.
Not to mention Prowse grabbing Wilfs neck. Everything leading up to Wilf getting booked went against him.. but he must laugh it off as Hazard gets fouled just as much... ridiculous.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Tickled pink Cornwall 01 Feb 19 5.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
When the officials re-watch the game to come to a decision about Zaha's behaviour they will also have to watch the challenge from Prowse that preceded it because he started his protest from that moment, if they do drop this so called ref as punishment for his amazing and astonishing performance during the whole game will they then take this into account when Zaha returns his plea.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 01 Feb 19 6.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Tickled pink
When the officials re-watch the game to come to a decision about Zaha's behaviour they will also have to watch the challenge from Prowse that preceded it because he started his protest from that moment, if they do drop this so called ref as punishment for his amazing and astonishing performance during the whole game will they then take this into account when Zaha returns his plea. Porkair, climb to level 330 now and contact France on 168.8, good day.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.