Women's football

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 5 of 5 << First < 1 2 3 4 5

becky over the moon 21 May 19 11.57am
Originally posted by MKCPFC Sad thing is Jamesey , they have equality in the prize money at Wimbledon and I think other tournaments. How does that work when they do half as much work to win?. They should be asked to play 5 sets to make it fair. That would just be prolonging the agony for the rest of us, especially since so many of them cannot hit a ball without grunting, shrieking or emitting any other high pitched, irritating noise. No thanks, best of 3 is quite enough for me to watch. A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

becky

over the moon 21 May 19 11.57am

Originally posted by MKCPFC

Sad thing is Jamesey , they have equality in the prize money at Wimbledon and I think other tournaments.
How does that work when they do half as much work to win?. They should be asked to play 5 sets to make it fair.

That would just be prolonging the agony for the rest of us, especially since so many of them cannot hit a ball without grunting, shrieking or emitting any other high pitched, irritating noise.

No thanks, best of 3 is quite enough for me to watch.

A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

MKCPFC Spain/MK 21 May 19 2.01pm
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman Now that would be rubbish. It’s usually obvious who’s going to win early on. Make the semis and finals best of 5 but I don’t see the point in having 6-2, 6-1, 6-0, or the winner of said match losing one set 2-6 or 3-6. Edited by Rudi Hedman (21 May 2019 11.37am) Totally agree it would be rubbish if you had to watch it. Point is how can they justify getting the same money . Most of the early games barely last half an hour and are poor quality As said how did they manage too get equal pay ?
Alert a moderator to this post

MKCPFC

Spain/MK 21 May 19 2.01pm

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Now that would be rubbish. It’s usually obvious who’s going to win early on. Make the semis and finals best of 5 but I don’t see the point in having 6-2, 6-1, 6-0, or the winner of said match losing one set 2-6 or 3-6.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (21 May 2019 11.37am)

Totally agree it would be rubbish if you had to watch it.
Point is how can they justify getting the same money .
Most of the early games barely last half an hour and are poor quality
As said how did they manage too get equal pay ?

Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman Caterham 21 May 19 11.22pm
Originally posted by MKCPFC Totally agree it would be rubbish if you had to watch it. Point is how can they justify getting the same money . Most of the early games barely last half an hour and are poor quality As said how did they manage too get equal pay ? Billy Jean Ming Lesbian wasn’t it? COYP
Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman

Caterham 21 May 19 11.22pm

Originally posted by MKCPFC

Billy Jean Ming Lesbian wasn’t it?

COYP

Alert a moderator to this post

ex hibitionist Hastings 22 May 19 8.19pm
I'm an appalling liberal snowflake, but there is an equally appalling PC agenda with the girls' game, and they obviously shouldn't get as much money as the blokes (tennis players - apart from Anna Kournikova) and live and let live where gay people are concerned (homophobes are usually in the closet) but lesbians really should not be allowed to go to a sperm bank and bring up a kid, and toilets shouldn't be gender neutral and sex changes for primary school children are insane and those people complaining about gay education in children's story books have a perfectly fair point and men's tennis is longer hours and harder work so of course they should get paid more and the reason people don't watch women's football is not sexism it's cos its s***e. Aaah that's better.
Alert a moderator to this post

ex hibitionist

Hastings 22 May 19 8.19pm

Send a Private Message to ex hibitionist

I'm an appalling liberal snowflake, but there is an equally appalling PC agenda with the girls' game, and they obviously shouldn't get as much money as the blokes (tennis players - apart from Anna Kournikova) and live and let live where gay people are concerned (homophobes are usually in the closet) but lesbians really should not be allowed to go to a sperm bank and bring up a kid, and toilets shouldn't be gender neutral and sex changes for primary school children are insane and those people complaining about gay education in children's story books have a perfectly fair point and men's tennis is longer hours and harder work so of course they should get paid more and the reason people don't watch women's football is not sexism it's cos its s***e. Aaah that's better.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 5 of 5 << First < 1 2 3 4 5

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Women's football

Site Map

Sponsors