You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
March 29 2024 12.45am

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1922 of 2586 < 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 >

Topic Locked

View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 09 Jul 19 6.19pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Maine Eagle

Whitie? I thought I was Mainey?

What can I say....I like to mix it up.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 09 Jul 19 9.41pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

It certainly means something, but it doesn’t mean you have a mandate for no deal.

Given you’re the one claiming that it means something it doesn’t, have a think about who’s doing the spinning.

You mentioned no deal. I am suggesting that the vote clearly suggested that very many Leavers are not happy with the deal that has been 'negotiated'.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Jimenez's Profile Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 10 Jul 19 12.16am Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

[Link]

LOL. Crowdfund that Asshole!!!!

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
.TUX. Flag 10 Jul 19 7.35am

Originally posted by Jimenez

[Link]

LOL. Crowdfund that Asshole!!!!

 


Buy Litecoin.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 10 Jul 19 8.07am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Jimenez

[Link]

LOL. Crowdfund that Asshole!!!!

If he is hoping that the public will bail him out I think that bus has left. It was a stupid publicity stunt, stupid because taking people to court is always very expensive. Now there are some doubts as to how he spent the money he crowdfunded so I think even the most passionate Remainers will think this one has run its course.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 10 Jul 19 8.51am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Austin Mitchel weighs in on Labour's about face on Brexit and he is not happy.

[Link]

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 10 Jul 19 11.16am Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Originally posted by Jimenez

[Link]

LOL. Crowdfund that Asshole!!!!

He was renting a £3k per month luxury apartment in Canary Wharf up until the end of last year.. obviously had ideas way above his pay grade.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View dannyboy1978's Profile dannyboy1978 Flag 10 Jul 19 6.13pm Send a Private Message to dannyboy1978 Add dannyboy1978 as a friend

And what's far right "voting for brexit"
[Link]

The only mass violence I'm seeing is from the left AKA ice cream woman and her mob. Not mass violence from the right.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 10 Jul 19 6.21pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Originally posted by dannyboy1978

And what's far right "voting for brexit"
[Link]

The only mass violence I'm seeing is from the left AKA ice cream woman and her mob. Not mass violence from the right.

What does the article have to do with Brexit?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View dannyboy1978's Profile dannyboy1978 Flag 10 Jul 19 6.36pm Send a Private Message to dannyboy1978 Add dannyboy1978 as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

What does the article have to do with Brexit?

Because anyone who voted brexit automatically branded right wing.

The point I'm saying is were is this right wing violence? I've seen plenty left wing violence against brexit but the BBC fail to mention that.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 10 Jul 19 7.06pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Originally posted by dannyboy1978

Because anyone who voted brexit automatically branded right wing.

The point I'm saying is were is this right wing violence? I've seen plenty left wing violence against brexit but the BBC fail to mention that.

Well it’s not incorrect to say the majority of Brexiteers are right wing - that’s not the same as far right though.

The whole article is about a very specific incident of right wing violence, presumably because they have an interview with the Austrian chap and are building a story around it.

What incidents of left wing violence against Brexit are you referring to?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
deleted user Flag 10 Jul 19 7.14pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

It seems to me that by promoting lifestyles that would increase the number of same sex relationships and hence reduce reproduction rates is doing exactly that...You are indeed supporting the 'configuring of society'....but just along the lines that you want.

I as said, I think you have an internal inconsistency between your views of the sexual and that of the racial.

To take your wider point....I have a certain acceptance of the general principle.....However, like I've stated people following your principles are walking into demographic replacement.

Similar to what the Dalai Lama said, England is for the English.....A country like Japan, China and many others outside Europe protect their biological heritage and I ask for nothing more.....I view that as highly important as people with your views enable its destruction.



This I will add, since I missed your message where you said you wanted me to continue to argue this point.

Recognision of a type of person and relationship is not 'promotion of a lifestyle'. Neither a sexual preference nor a race is in and of itself a 'lifestyle'. Sure if we're going to point to a worse case scenario of behaviour, for the former example there are those engaging in gangs, and for the latter unprotected sex. Those are ill advised lifestyles. In neither case, in an educational environment are those lifestyles promoted. In fact education endeavours to do the very opposite. 'Promotion of' policies like section 28 caused much harm than good. School groups supporting gay youth shut down in their droves as did support in general as there was concern about breaking the law. My own brother suffered mercilessly at the hands of vicious bullies during this time. So I speak up at cruel and outmoded policies, slurs and attitudes as it might help to put that take out there. A take that is not a controversial stance in wider society.

So the basic act of discussing different types of relationship isn't 'promotion'. It's a recognision of real life. By your logic though, as you believe that discussing these relationships 'configures society' to be a place where there are somehow more gay people, you will also be of the mind that where relationships are depicted between members of different races, that can also promote and encourage those kind of relationships. That is clearly something that both has been and can easily be heavily influenced by societal views. It requires zero shift in sexuality. Just the a-ok by social. In decades past, it would have been shocking, due to prejudice of the times, for someone to have kids with someone of another race, whereas now it's rightly a complete irrelevance to most people. So, considering the frequent passion and value you attribute to the white racial identity, where's your scathing Viktor Orbán style take on racial mixing within education and society being 'promoted'? There is certainly far more danger to your specific world view from this than other low hanging fruit. It just doesn't play as well for you to vocalise it. It's easier to demean demographics where there is a free pass.


With my view on having a very strict immigration policy , I'm not sure how you've decided that I 'enable the destruction' of 'Europe's biological heritage', but each to their own. If you mean do I attribute different values of those close to me based on their colour, then no.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post

Topic Locked

Page 1922 of 2586 < 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic