Decade of the Red Pill

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 5 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

cryrst The garden of England 31 Dec 19 5.14pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle No-one forces you to do anything. You can easily avoid them. I do. I do though treasure the BBC for it's objectivity in news and current affairs along with it's constant stream of informative science based output. I am more than happy to pay my licence fee to keep the BBC free of commercial influences but you can choose not to if it makes you that unhappy. I don't though subscribe to Sky because I want nothing to do with any enterprise that Murdoch has ever had an influence over. You dont mind having him and his employees tax money though. Bit two faced really. Hows your pension and health care doing?
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 31 Dec 19 5.14pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

No-one forces you to do anything. You can easily avoid them. I do.

I do though treasure the BBC for it's objectivity in news and current affairs along with it's constant stream of informative science based output.

I am more than happy to pay my licence fee to keep the BBC free of commercial influences but you can choose not to if it makes you that unhappy. I don't though subscribe to Sky because I want nothing to do with any enterprise that Murdoch has ever had an influence over.

You dont mind having him and his employees tax money though.
Bit two faced really.
Hows your pension and health care doing?

Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11 Beckenham 31 Dec 19 5.14pm
Originally posted by Matov For me the over-riding concern for the UK in the next 10 years should be full energy independence. Fracking, nuclear power, wind or wave, hydrogen cells, any and everything other than oil really. As you might expect, I have nothing other than utter contempt for the usual Climate Emergency types but the reality is that it is in our national interest to seek out more and more ways of generating our own power needs. Their abhorrence of oil is justified as are the voices on the left who decry our turning a blind eye to the excesses of the Arab ruling classes because they buy our shiny toys. By 2029 I would love to see the influence of Petro-dollars have waned to almost insignificance. Because those have been the cancer in our society. Would happily pay extra tax if ring-fenced specifically for research and development in this field and if successful, the real game changer on a variety of levels. Once the UK is able to light and warm all its homes and business without recourse to any foreign input, then a whole host of other issues become solvable in record time. Whether it will happen or not though...a good question. I suspect the tumourous impact of the petro-dollar has already effectively bought most of our institutions but we will see. Have to be optimistic on that score. Energy is the key for me. Been saying this for a while in 1979 Saudi extremists very nearly overthrow the government when they attacked Mecca if they had succeeded they would have turned the oil off. We should not be depending on our energy from unstable and despotic regimes. The West is still very dependent on oil and gas and if I was a terrorist I would be looking at cutting those supplies as it would cause more damage then 9/11. If I were the climate changes I would be pointing this out as another reason to go green, One more point
Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11

Beckenham 31 Dec 19 5.14pm

Originally posted by Matov

For me the over-riding concern for the UK in the next 10 years should be full energy independence. Fracking, nuclear power, wind or wave, hydrogen cells, any and everything other than oil really.

As you might expect, I have nothing other than utter contempt for the usual Climate Emergency types but the reality is that it is in our national interest to seek out more and more ways of generating our own power needs. Their abhorrence of oil is justified as are the voices on the left who decry our turning a blind eye to the excesses of the Arab ruling classes because they buy our shiny toys.

By 2029 I would love to see the influence of Petro-dollars have waned to almost insignificance. Because those have been the cancer in our society. Would happily pay extra tax if ring-fenced specifically for research and development in this field and if successful, the real game changer on a variety of levels.

Once the UK is able to light and warm all its homes and business without recourse to any foreign input, then a whole host of other issues become solvable in record time.

Whether it will happen or not though...a good question. I suspect the tumourous impact of the petro-dollar has already effectively bought most of our institutions but we will see. Have to be optimistic on that score.

Energy is the key for me.

Been saying this for a while in 1979 Saudi extremists very nearly overthrow the government when they attacked Mecca if they had succeeded they would have turned the oil off. We should not be depending on our energy from unstable and despotic regimes.

The West is still very dependent on oil and gas and if I was a terrorist I would be looking at cutting those supplies as it would cause more damage then 9/11.

If I were the climate changes I would be pointing this out as another reason to go green,

One more point

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 31 Dec 19 5.18pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle No-one forces you to do anything. You can easily avoid them. I do. I do though treasure the BBC for it's objectivity in news and current affairs along with it's constant stream of informative science based output. I am more than happy to pay my licence fee to keep the BBC free of commercial influences but you can choose not to if it makes you that unhappy. I don't though subscribe to Sky because I want nothing to do with any enterprise that Murdoch has ever had an influence over. I didn�t say I was forced I said the agenda was being forced. Sky has an endless supply of sport, documentaries, arts programmes and old films. Not paying the license fee isn�t really a option is it? That the BBC chooses to pass on some 11,300 people�s license money to a...well, to Gary Lineker is ridiculous.
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

31 Dec 19 5.18pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

No-one forces you to do anything. You can easily avoid them. I do.

I do though treasure the BBC for it's objectivity in news and current affairs along with it's constant stream of informative science based output.

I didn�t say I was forced I said the agenda was being forced. Sky has an endless supply of sport, documentaries, arts programmes and old films.
Not paying the license fee isn�t really a option is it? That the BBC chooses to pass on some 11,300 people�s license money to a...well, to Gary Lineker is ridiculous.

Alert a moderator to this post

Matov 31 Dec 19 5.31pm
Originally posted by Badger11 The West is still very dependent on oil and gas and if I was a terrorist I would be looking at cutting those supplies as it would cause more damage then 9/11. The drone attacks on Saudi oil installations is a prime example of how this actually plays out in reality although there is plenty of smoke and mirrors behind that I suspect, along with questions to be asked about the lack of response. "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.
Alert a moderator to this post

Matov

31 Dec 19 5.31pm

Originally posted by Badger11

The West is still very dependent on oil and gas and if I was a terrorist I would be looking at cutting those supplies as it would cause more damage then 9/11.

The drone attacks on Saudi oil installations is a prime example of how this actually plays out in reality although there is plenty of smoke and mirrors behind that I suspect, along with questions to be asked about the lack of response.

"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 31 Dec 19 7.29pm
Originally posted by cryrst You dont mind having him and his employees tax money though. Bit two faced really. Hows your pension and health care doing? Oh I would more than happily do without any money from Murdoch's operations in the UK. If they were all banned as not being in the public interest then what would we miss? Someone else would pick up the sport. Maybe the BBC again, free for us all. The only one's to really suffer would be the over paid players. Removing his influence from the written media would be a good thing, in my opinion. His view of the world is not mine and his influence over governments far too strong. I fail to see what my pension and health care arrangements have to do with this. Or you. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 31 Dec 19 7.29pm

Originally posted by cryrst

You dont mind having him and his employees tax money though.
Bit two faced really.
Hows your pension and health care doing?

Oh I would more than happily do without any money from Murdoch's operations in the UK. If they were all banned as not being in the public interest then what would we miss?

Someone else would pick up the sport. Maybe the BBC again, free for us all. The only one's to really suffer would be the over paid players.

Removing his influence from the written media would be a good thing, in my opinion. His view of the world is not mine and his influence over governments far too strong.

I fail to see what my pension and health care arrangements have to do with this. Or you.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 31 Dec 19 7.40pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Oh I would more than happily do without any money from Murdoch's operations in the UK. If they were all banned as not being in the public interest then what would we miss? Someone else would pick up the sport. Maybe the BBC again, free for us all. The only one's to really suffer would be the over paid players. Removing his influence from the written media would be a good thing, in my opinion. His view of the world is not mine and his influence over governments far too strong. I fail to see what my pension and health care arrangements have to do with this. Or you. The players being overplayed is supply and demand. Billions is invested because of these overplayed players. Which in turn produces tax income for the government. You dont have to watch or read his material and his tax money helps towards your pension and nhs.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 31 Dec 19 7.40pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Oh I would more than happily do without any money from Murdoch's operations in the UK. If they were all banned as not being in the public interest then what would we miss?

Someone else would pick up the sport. Maybe the BBC again, free for us all. The only one's to really suffer would be the over paid players.

Removing his influence from the written media would be a good thing, in my opinion. His view of the world is not mine and his influence over governments far too strong.

I fail to see what my pension and health care arrangements have to do with this. Or you.

The players being overplayed is supply and demand.
Billions is invested because of these overplayed players.
Which in turn produces tax income for the government.
You dont have to watch or read his material and his tax money helps towards your pension and nhs.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 31 Dec 19 9.03pm
Originally posted by cryrst The players being overplayed is supply and demand. They are indeed over played but I am sure you mean overpaid, as I said. It is of course due to supply and demand but the plain fact is that it has become ridiculous and some intervention which diverted money to the development of the game both here and abroad beneficial. Billions is invested because of these overplayed players. In what? Things which generate future income for the players? Which in turn produces tax income for the government. Not when it goes abroad, as much of it does. You dont have to watch or read his material and his tax money helps towards your pension and nhs. I don't either watch or read anything from Murdoch sources. As I said I would much prefer that there was no contribution at all to UK funds from him. He should have been kicked out years ago when we had the opportunity to do so. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 31 Dec 19 9.03pm

Originally posted by cryrst

The players being overplayed is supply and demand.

They are indeed over played but I am sure you mean overpaid, as I said. It is of course due to supply and demand but the plain fact is that it has become ridiculous and some intervention which diverted money to the development of the game both here and abroad beneficial.

Billions is invested because of these overplayed players.

In what? Things which generate future income for the players?

Which in turn produces tax income for the government.

Not when it goes abroad, as much of it does.

You dont have to watch or read his material and his tax money helps towards your pension and nhs.

I don't either watch or read anything from Murdoch sources. As I said I would much prefer that there was no contribution at all to UK funds from him. He should have been kicked out years ago when we had the opportunity to do so.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

silvertop Portishead 31 Dec 19 9.21pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays Statistically women stick to their own more than men do. So while our arseh0le elites have been opening us up to mass immigration to keep their low wage servant class....its effect socially.....while permanent and disastous is on slow burn. As for society I get the cynicism and share some of it. However, you are here to reproduce....these are problems and challenges that a man overcomes.....recover, analyse and overcome. Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Dec 2019 12.16pm) Is that right about the stats? Women from minorities certainly stick to their own but those from the white majority?
Alert a moderator to this post

silvertop

Portishead 31 Dec 19 9.21pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Statistically women stick to their own more than men do. So while our arseh0le elites have been opening us up to mass immigration to keep their low wage servant class....its effect socially.....while permanent and disastous is on slow burn.

As for society I get the cynicism and share some of it.

However, you are here to reproduce....these are problems and challenges that a man overcomes.....recover, analyse and overcome.

Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Dec 2019 12.16pm)

Is that right about the stats? Women from minorities certainly stick to their own but those from the white majority?

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 01 Jan 20 12.12am
Originally posted by silvertop Is that right about the stats? Women from minorities certainly stick to their own but those from the white majority? Yep. One is just advertised more than the other. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

01 Jan 20 12.12am

Originally posted by silvertop

Is that right about the stats? Women from minorities certainly stick to their own but those from the white majority?

Yep.

One is just advertised more than the other.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

PalazioVecchio south pole 02 Jan 20 12.50pm
Originally posted by silvertop Is that right about the stats? Women from minorities certainly stick to their own but those from the white majority? Are you saying that David Bowie & Iman are an exception to the rule ? What are your statistics? Eze Peasy at Anfield....
Alert a moderator to this post

PalazioVecchio

south pole 02 Jan 20 12.50pm

Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio

Originally posted by silvertop

Is that right about the stats?

Women from minorities certainly stick to their own but those from the white majority?

Are you saying that David Bowie & Iman are an exception to the rule ?

What are your statistics?

Eze Peasy at Anfield....

Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 02 Jan 20 2.18pm
Bowie and Iman are hardly going to be unexceptional. Supermodel and music superstar. Try the guy who works down Asda for the unexceptional. Red and Blue Army!
Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC

Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 02 Jan 20 2.18pm

Bowie and Iman are hardly going to be unexceptional. Supermodel and music superstar. Try the guy who works down Asda for the unexceptional.

Red and Blue Army!

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 05 Mar 20 11.44pm
There is something extremely sad in this action.....yet Apple promote it as a positive. Says something about the people who thought up the ad. [Tweet Link] 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

05 Mar 20 11.44pm

There is something extremely sad in this action.....yet Apple promote it as a positive. Says something about the people who thought up the ad.

[Tweet Link]

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 5 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Decade of the Red Pill

Site Map

Sponsors