Premier owners
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 bexleydave  Barnehurst 17 Apr 20 2.30pm |
   |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Aray
An interesting topic and welcome distraction from wfh. I guess this is prompted by the Saudi takeover of the Toon. Does any other Palace fan feel grateful we are not majority owned by a sadistic, misogonistic, theocracy? Harris can keep his additional dosh - he's not a benefactor but a business man. Unless you find one with very, very deep pockets you're skating on thin ice. Personally I want the club to be run as a business by decent people. The yanks (who are minority shareholders) maybe private equity types, so hardly pristine but far better than some of the alternatives in my view. Err no; they're the largest shareholders by far. Where did you get the idea that they weren't from?
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 17 Apr 20 2.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by bexleydave
Harris and Blitzer have 18% of the shares each as does Parish.Accordingly, the Directors have 54% of the shares. Edited by Willo (17 Apr 2020 2.40pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| bexleydave Barnehurst 17 Apr 20 2.49pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Harris and Blitzer have 18% of the shares each as does Parish.Accordingly, the Directors have 54% of the shares. Unless you have access to the ultimate holding company's records (which none of have) it's impossible to say who owns what; suffice to say that the two major US investors have a controlling interest. Unfortunately Google can't help on this one.
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 17 Apr 20 5.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by bexleydave
Unless you have access to the ultimate holding company's records (which none of have) it's impossible to say who owns what; suffice to say that the two major US investors have a controlling interest. Unfortunately Google can't help on this one. Isn't it the case that other US investors own shares? unfortunately the smoke and mirrors involved shroud it in mystery
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
eagleman13  On The Road To Hell & Alicante 17 Apr 20 5.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Aray
An interesting topic and welcome distraction from wfh. I guess this is prompted by the Saudi takeover of the Toon. Does any other Palace fan feel grateful we are not majority owned by a sadistic, misogonistic, theocracy? Harris can keep his additional dosh - he's not a benefactor but a business man. Unless you find one with very, very deep pockets you're skating on thin ice. Personally I want the club to be run as a business by decent people. The yanks (who are minority shareholders) maybe private equity types, so hardly pristine but far better than some of the alternatives in my view. Never thought of Mike Ashley like that, but, now you come to mention it . . . .
I'm a blind man, i'm a blind man, now my room is cold, |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC Online  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 17 Apr 20 7.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
The board are allowed to put some cash into the club. I can't remember how much but it is something like 12 mil a season and then there is no penalty. That just about covers one or two players' wages. Something tells me that there are ways round it for other teams. Just not us, apparently.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ASCPFC Online Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 17 Apr 20 7.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I had wondered whether our US owners had decided to cut pay for staff in their other teams. Initially, they were going to cut salaries, but Daniel Levyed their decision. The statement from them is reasonable enough.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| braunstoneagle the middle of bumf*** nowhere... 17 Apr 20 9.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
The board are allowed to put some cash into the club. I can't remember how much but it is something like 12 mil a season and then there is no penalty. That just about covers one or two players' wages. Something tells me that there are ways round it for other teams. Just not us, apparently. i think you are allowed to lose £105m over 3 season period to avoid FFP sanctions in the PL.
‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| braunstoneagle the middle of bumf*** nowhere... 17 Apr 20 9.13pm |
|
|---|---|
|
also i would much rather have SP as an owner and flirt with mid-table than have that s***house who has brought noocastle, even if they do invest heavily and get champs league. genuinely cannot believe their fans are happy having this guy over ashley, who ran the club properly.
‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
HKOwen  Hong Kong 18 Apr 20 3.26am |
|
|---|---|
|
The misogony ( sic ) doesn't prevent being in a consortium put together by a woman. I am no fan of Saudi Arabia or political posturing on football forums. Originally posted by Aray
An interesting topic and welcome distraction from wfh. I guess this is prompted by the Saudi takeover of the Toon. Does any other Palace fan feel grateful we are not majority owned by a sadistic, misogonistic, theocracy? Harris can keep his additional dosh - he's not a benefactor but a business man. Unless you find one with very, very deep pockets you're skating on thin ice. Personally I want the club to be run as a business by decent people. The yanks (who are minority shareholders) maybe private equity types, so hardly pristine but far better than some of the alternatives in my view.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| HKOwen Hong Kong 18 Apr 20 3.27am |
|
|---|---|
|
If you have a poll of Toon fans on the question " Did Ashley run the club properly, yes or no , you think there would be a yes majority? Just asking Originally posted by braunstoneagle
also i would much rather have SP as an owner and flirt with mid-table than have that s***house who has brought noocastle, even if they do invest heavily and get champs league. genuinely cannot believe their fans are happy having this guy over ashley, who ran the club properly.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ARGILE OLD GEEZER  PORTIMAO 18 Apr 20 9.05am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by bexleydave
Err no; they're the largest shareholders by far. Where did you get the idea that they weren't from? No, they are not he largest share holder they only hold 36% between them, Parish and a few other share holders can out vote then, of course if they sided with the yanks they would win the vote
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.