Signings On The Way
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Spiderman  Horsham 11 Aug 20 6.21pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by New Forest Eagle
Yeh nothing! I don’t read the Sun so I don’t know however as I have said previously I like Dazza’s posts and want him to continue. If you don’t like them or don’t believe him, fine, don’t read what he has to say
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
grumpymort  US/Thailand/UK 11 Aug 20 6.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by JRW2
Not relevant to this thread, but didn't Niasse do something to anger us all at a home match against Everton 2 or 3 years ago? Or did he just score against us?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Petereagle Brockley 11 Aug 20 6.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
I don’t read the Sun so I don’t know however as I have said previously I like Dazza’s posts and want him to continue. If you don’t like them or don’t believe him, fine, don’t read what he has to say Personally I've come to the conclusion that Dazza does have an 'inside line'. It doesn't mean that's what's going to happen, more that's what the club's intentions are at a particular moment in time.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| New Forest Eagle Darlington 11 Aug 20 8.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
I don’t read the Sun so I don’t know however as I have said previously I like Dazza’s posts and want him to continue. If you don’t like them or don’t believe him, fine, don’t read what he has to say I have not said Dazza should stop posting.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| eritheagle Erith 11 Aug 20 9.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by grumpymort
It was more the fact that he dived for a penalty and received a retrospective ban from the FA than the goal he scored in the match.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Petereagle Brockley 12 Aug 20 9.36am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by eritheagle
It was more the fact that he dived for a penalty and received a retrospective ban from the FA than the goal he scored in the match. The Nathan Ferguson deal not over, fee to be assessed by Tribunal
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 12 Aug 20 10.00am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Petereagle
The Nathan Ferguson deal not over, fee to be assessed by Tribunal That was never a surprise he is under 23. I doubt the tribunal will award them £12m though more likely to be £2m.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Eaglecoops CR3 12 Aug 20 10.05am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
That was never a surprise he is under 23. I doubt the tribunal will award them £12m though more likely to be £2m. Yes and this will have been accounted for already. If we were willing to pay more than this until his injury then I have no worries about the tribunal figure. We will still get him cheaper this way.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 12 Aug 20 10.21am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
That was never a surprise he is under 23. I doubt the tribunal will award them £12m though more likely to be £2m. Although I would imagine our initial January offer will be taken into consideration, so possibly more will be paid than a normal tribunal valuation. It appears that we have made an offer to stop it going to a tribunal but rejected by West Brom
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| JohnB 12 Aug 20 11.07am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Although I would imagine our initial January offer will be taken into consideration, so possibly more will be paid than a normal tribunal valuation. It appears that we have made an offer to stop it going to a tribunal but rejected by West Brom According to fullcontactlaw.co.uk the PFCC decide the fee by taking into account the costs of both clubs in operating a Football Academy or Centre of Excellence, as well as the age and playing record of the player, the length of time he was registered with his original club, the terms offered by both clubs, the status of the two clubs, the substantiated interest shown by other clubs in acquiring the registration of the player and any amounts paid by the original club to acquire the player in the first place. The only similar example to Ferguson was Cresswell 10 years ago so I would expect the initial fees to go up massively but the structure of the deal to be similar: AARON CRESWELL Aaron Creswell had made 70 or so league appearances for Tranmere Rovers when, aged 21, he rejected a new long term contract offer. He signed for the Championship club Ipswich Town on a three year contract.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Palace in the Blood 12 Aug 20 11.55am |
|
|---|---|
|
It is very difficult to predict what tribunal will decide. We bid £12 million for a fully fit player. The injury will have a great effect on initial value. there is no guarantee he will recover fully and be same player again. My guess is they will go for a low initial fee with further sums on reaching milestones such as number of appearances , call up to senior national squad etc plus a sell on fee percent.After Zaha experience we fear this last part and hence tried to agree a figure without a sell on clause
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Den1923  14 Aug 20 10.22am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Bullhorn76
Yep one of Roy/Doug/beaky saying we identified a number of targets but we couldn’t get them across the line , see you in October folks good luck that the statement Parish has already prepared for 8th October! wonder how that one leaked!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.