Topic

2020 US Presidential Election. (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 74 of 442 < 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 >

Topic Locked

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 14 Oct 20 10.51pm
Originally posted by matthau [Link] [Link] For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 14 Oct 20 10.51pm

Originally posted by matthau

[Link]

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 14 Oct 20 10.51pm
Originally posted by matthau [Link] Wow. Do you think it's true mat. Bad times coming if it is tbh.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 14 Oct 20 10.51pm

Originally posted by matthau

[Link]

Wow. Do you think it's true mat.
Bad times coming if it is tbh.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 14 Oct 20 10.52pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle [Link] Go figure a left wing report.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 14 Oct 20 10.52pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

[Link]

Go figure a left wing report.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 14 Oct 20 11.26pm
Originally posted by cryrst Go figure a left wing report. It's a report from a real journalist working within our internationally respected national broadcaster's "anti-disinformation unit". Dismissing such work as "left wing" is exactly what these conspiracy theorists want you to do. I suggest you consider the assertions and probabilities of them being correct on both sides of the argument. Look for real evidence, rather than oft-repeated other conspiracy theories that seem to have entered into the consciencness of some and become unquestioned fact, when they are simply untrue. Pizzagate was completely debunked. George Soros does not fund terrorism. etc etc. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 14 Oct 20 11.26pm

Originally posted by cryrst

Go figure a left wing report.

It's a report from a real journalist working within our internationally respected national broadcaster's "anti-disinformation unit".

Dismissing such work as "left wing" is exactly what these conspiracy theorists want you to do.

I suggest you consider the assertions and probabilities of them being correct on both sides of the argument. Look for real evidence, rather than oft-repeated other conspiracy theories that seem to have entered into the consciencness of some and become unquestioned fact, when they are simply untrue. Pizzagate was completely debunked. George Soros does not fund terrorism. etc etc.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

cpfc_chap koh samui 15 Oct 20 6.01am
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle It's a report from a real journalist working within our internationally respected national broadcaster's "anti-disinformation unit". Dismissing such work as "left wing" is exactly what these conspiracy theorists want you to do. I suggest you consider the assertions and probabilities of them being correct on both sides of the argument. Look for real evidence, rather than oft-repeated other conspiracy theories that seem to have entered into the consciencness of some and become unquestioned fact, when they are simply untrue. Pizzagate was completely debunked. George Soros does not fund terrorism. etc etc. BBC respected really? You should do some research try staying away from msm. It's all out there
Alert a moderator to this post

cpfc_chap

koh samui 15 Oct 20 6.01am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

It's a report from a real journalist working within our internationally respected national broadcaster's "anti-disinformation unit".

Dismissing such work as "left wing" is exactly what these conspiracy theorists want you to do.

BBC respected really? You should do some research try staying away from msm.

It's all out there

Alert a moderator to this post

Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 15 Oct 20 7.37am
I have a feeling this election is going to get a lot hotter as we near polling day. Trump is treading a careful path, perhaps because the election is seemingly his to lose. In the last 2 days before polling, Biden must be able to let loose some real dirt on Trump. Trump got off lightly with Stormy Daniels, and having to put his business interest under alternative stewardship. Biden lacks any sort of political charisma (from what I've seen). So will it be a case of the USA choosing the 'least worst option', rather than an inspiring candidate. ? "The facts have changed", Rishi Sunak
Alert a moderator to this post

Forest Hillbilly

in a hidey-hole 15 Oct 20 7.37am

Send a Private Message to Forest Hillbilly

I have a feeling this election is going to get a lot hotter as we near polling day.
Trump is treading a careful path, perhaps because the election is seemingly his to lose.

In the last 2 days before polling, Biden must be able to let loose some real dirt on Trump. Trump got off lightly with Stormy Daniels, and having to put his business interest under alternative stewardship.

Biden lacks any sort of political charisma (from what I've seen).

So will it be a case of the USA choosing the 'least worst option', rather than an inspiring candidate. ?

"The facts have changed", Rishi Sunak

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 15 Oct 20 7.47am
Originally posted by cpfc_chap BBC respected really? You should do some research try staying away from msm. It's all out there Yes it is. It really is "all out there". You do though need to look in the correct places rather than the "right" ones. Whilst trust in the MSM is being eroded by the relentless attacks on it, most notably from Trump, the BBC remains the most trusted source of news in the world. Including the USA:- [Link] For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 15 Oct 20 7.47am

Originally posted by cpfc_chap

BBC respected really? You should do some research try staying away from msm.

It's all out there

Yes it is. It really is "all out there". You do though need to look in the correct places rather than the "right" ones.

Whilst trust in the MSM is being eroded by the relentless attacks on it, most notably from Trump, the BBC remains the most trusted source of news in the world. Including the USA:-
[Link]

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 15 Oct 20 7.59am
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Yes it is. It really is "all out there". You do though need to look in the correct places rather than the "right" ones. Whilst trust in the MSM is being eroded by the relentless attacks on it, most notably from Trump, the BBC remains the most trusted source of news in the world. Including the USA:- [Link] Not sure the DG necessarily agrees with you [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 15 Oct 20 7.59am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Yes it is. It really is "all out there". You do though need to look in the correct places rather than the "right" ones.

Whilst trust in the MSM is being eroded by the relentless attacks on it, most notably from Trump, the BBC remains the most trusted source of news in the world. Including the USA:-
[Link]

Not sure the DG necessarily agrees with you

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 15 Oct 20 8.03am
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly I have a feeling this election is going to get a lot hotter as we near polling day. Trump is treading a careful path, perhaps because the election is seemingly his to lose. How do you reach that conclusion? Trump is a consistent 10 points behind nationally and in all the battleground states. His odds have slumped to 2-1 against. An analysis of a variety of outcomes give him a 12% chance of winning. He is no longer the candidate of change, but needs to find new voters. Where will they come from? There will be heat, but it's not going to change anything. In the last 2 days before polling, Biden must be able to let loose some real dirt on Trump. Trump got off lightly with Stormy Daniels, and having to put his business interest under alternative stewardship. No need. The more dignified he acts the greater the differentiation will be seen. Biden lacks any sort of political charisma (from what I've seen). His appeal is not being Trump. It doesn't require anything else. In fact a bland charism probably helps as it enhances the contrast. So will it be a case of the USA choosing the 'least worst option', rather than an inspiring candidate. ? That's true, but often the case for many people who expect perfection and are disappointed when the opposition media dig the dirt which exists for everyone. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 15 Oct 20 8.03am

Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly

I have a feeling this election is going to get a lot hotter as we near polling day.
Trump is treading a careful path, perhaps because the election is seemingly his to lose.

How do you reach that conclusion? Trump is a consistent 10 points behind nationally and in all the battleground states. His odds have slumped to 2-1 against. An analysis of a variety of outcomes give him a 12% chance of winning. He is no longer the candidate of change, but needs to find new voters. Where will they come from? There will be heat, but it's not going to change anything.

No need. The more dignified he acts the greater the differentiation will be seen.

Biden lacks any sort of political charisma (from what I've seen).

His appeal is not being Trump. It doesn't require anything else. In fact a bland charism probably helps as it enhances the contrast.

So will it be a case of the USA choosing the 'least worst option', rather than an inspiring candidate. ?

That's true, but often the case for many people who expect perfection and are disappointed when the opposition media dig the dirt which exists for everyone.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 15 Oct 20 8.10am
Originally posted by Spiderman Not sure the DG necessarily agrees with you [Link] That quote has nothing to do with how trusted the BBC is! It is only emphasising how important it is that it retains it's impartiality. Which is true. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 15 Oct 20 8.10am

Originally posted by Spiderman

Not sure the DG necessarily agrees with you

[Link]

That quote has nothing to do with how trusted the BBC is!

It is only emphasising how important it is that it retains it's impartiality. Which is true.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 15 Oct 20 8.15am
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle That quote has nothing to do with how trusted the BBC is! It is only emphasising how important it is that it retains it's impartiality. Which is true. Ok if he trust that they are impartial in their reporting that is your prerogative, I happen to think otherwise, my prerogative
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 15 Oct 20 8.15am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That quote has nothing to do with how trusted the BBC is!

It is only emphasising how important it is that it retains it's impartiality. Which is true.

Ok if he trust that they are impartial in their reporting that is your prerogative, I happen to think otherwise, my prerogative

Alert a moderator to this post