You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Eze
April 20 2024 4.42am

Eze

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 12 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

 

View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 18 Oct 20 7.10pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

He was on the bench so fit

But Wilf was so good he couldn't be subbed.

 

Red and Blue Army!
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View doombear's Profile doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 18 Oct 20 8.37pm Send a Private Message to doombear Add doombear as a friend

I suspect Roy wanted Schlupp to look after Mitchell so Eze (our only creative attacking midfield option) was sacrificed. The only Palace player on the pitch who can see a pass (Jairo) was far too occupied firefighting in front of the back 4, but on the rare occasions he had the space to be creative did some decent stuff.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PatrickA's Profile PatrickA Flag London 18 Oct 20 8.49pm Send a Private Message to PatrickA Add PatrickA as a friend

The Schlupp tactic worked and reduced Lamptey’s effectiveness.
The problem is that many teams play with an attacking threat down the right.
Does this mean Eze has to be sacrificed each time we play such a team?
As a long term Roy observer I don’t believe he will play Eze in a central midfield position.
This means the only positions available to him are wide midfield in a 4-4-2 or further forward supporting a lone striker- a tactic Roy doesn’t usually employ.
I do fear for Eze’s development under Roy.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 18 Oct 20 9.01pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by PatrickA

The Schlupp tactic worked and reduced Lamptey’s effectiveness.
The problem is that many teams play with an attacking threat down the right.
Does this mean Eze has to be sacrificed each time we play such a team?
As a long term Roy observer I don’t believe he will play Eze in a central midfield position.
This means the only positions available to him are wide midfield in a 4-4-2 or further forward supporting a lone striker- a tactic Roy doesn’t usually employ.
I do fear for Eze’s development under Roy.

Agreed

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Jacey's Profile Jacey Flag 18 Oct 20 9.11pm Send a Private Message to Jacey Add Jacey as a friend

Originally posted by PatrickA

The Schlupp tactic worked and reduced Lamptey’s effectiveness.
The problem is that many teams play with an attacking threat down the right.
Does this mean Eze has to be sacrificed each time we play such a team?
As a long term Roy observer I don’t believe he will play Eze in a central midfield position.
This means the only positions available to him are wide midfield in a 4-4-2 or further forward supporting a lone striker- a tactic Roy doesn’t usually employ.
I do fear for Eze’s development under Roy.

Eze should,in order to fulfil his huge potential,joined one of the many clubs after him, better equipped than Mr Hodgson to develop him as a player,rather than stagnate on the bench under this chump.


 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View EddieMac's Profile EddieMac Flag 18 Oct 20 9.22pm Send a Private Message to EddieMac Add EddieMac as a friend

Originally posted by doombear

I suspect Roy wanted Schlupp to look after Mitchell so Eze (our only creative attacking midfield option) was sacrificed. The only Palace player on the pitch who can see a pass (Jairo) was far too occupied firefighting in front of the back 4, but on the rare occasions he had the space to be creative did some decent stuff.

Spot on. Instead of putting them on the back foot with Eze we just invited attack after attack down the right.

Edited by EddieMac (18 Oct 2020 9.22pm)

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 18 Oct 20 9.30pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Roy has to teach eze how to be a DM and defend diligently. Flair gone, job done.
Nice one roy.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Oct 20 10.39pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Roy has to teach eze how to be a DM and defend diligently. Flair gone, job done.
Nice one roy.

Eze made his name at QPR as a central attacking midfielder with licence to express himself.
He will now have to play in a strait-jacket in a rigid 'Shape' and this system doesn't play to his strengths.
Square pegs and round holes spring readily to mind.Doesn't appear to be Hodgson's type of player.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HeathMan's Profile HeathMan Flag Purley 18 Oct 20 10.53pm Send a Private Message to HeathMan Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add HeathMan as a friend

Sorry to be boring - saying the same words time after time - but I do think that we have set out our stall well to attract our next manager. The question is who will say the words "out you go, show me what you can do" can be expected to produce great CPFC results. COYP

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View palace99's Profile palace99 Flag New Mills 30 Oct 20 12.26pm Send a Private Message to palace99 Add palace99 as a friend

i thought Eze was a No 10 who had licence to roam.

When he has played he's been stuck on the left wing and reminds me of Zaha under performing there last season. Now it appears Roy prefers Jeff for his defensive abilities.

Maybe he was signed as a Zaha replacement but i still think we can accommodate both.

Wilf and Bats upfront don't offer us any physical presence and neither can head the ball (despite both being 6 foot!!). Maybe just play Wilf in the 9 and Eze behind, especially at home. Then Roy can still have 2 workers on the wings.

Thoughts??

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View the.universal's Profile the.universal 30 Oct 20 12.36pm Send a Private Message to the.universal Add the.universal as a friend

If Eze is playing left wing in a 4-4-2 he will need to sharpen up his defensive game. That would be the same in most prem teams.

 

Vive le Roy!
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Eaglecoops's Profile Eaglecoops Flag CR3 30 Oct 20 1.47pm Send a Private Message to Eaglecoops Add Eaglecoops as a friend

Originally posted by palace99

i thought Eze was a No 10 who had licence to roam.

When he has played he's been stuck on the left wing and reminds me of Zaha under performing there last season. Now it appears Roy prefers Jeff for his defensive abilities.

Maybe he was signed as a Zaha replacement but i still think we can accommodate both.

Wilf and Bats upfront don't offer us any physical presence and neither can head the ball (despite both being 6 foot!!). Maybe just play Wilf in the 9 and Eze behind, especially at home. Then Roy can still have 2 workers on the wings.

Thoughts??

Almost for me. I would move Wilf back to the left and play Eze with and just behind Batshuyai. There is no reason why Townsend, Zaha and Eze can't interchange those 3 positions during the match if they feel there is a weakness to exploit.

Schlupp/Ayew miss out under this scenario so I'm not sure it will happen.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 12 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Eze