Burnley v Fulham

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 4 of 4 << First < 1 2 3 4

Phil’s Barber Crowborough 18 Feb 21 1.44pm
Originally posted by Willo I have no desire to dignify the comments with a specific response to the 'Charge'. It was a question Willo not a ‘Charge’ and one I am perfectly entitled to ask seeing as, without clarification, it appears you have completely contradicted yourself in your own remarks. Edited by Phil’s Barber (18 Feb 2021 1.45pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

Phil’s Barber

Crowborough 18 Feb 21 1.44pm

Originally posted by Willo

I have no desire to dignify the comments with a specific response to the 'Charge'.

It was a question Willo not a ‘Charge’ and one I am perfectly entitled to ask seeing as, without clarification, it appears you have completely contradicted yourself in your own remarks.

Edited by Phil’s Barber (18 Feb 2021 1.45pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Feb 21 2.04pm
Originally posted by Phil’s Barber It was a question Willo not a ‘Charge’ and one I am perfectly entitled to ask seeing as, without clarification, it appears you have completely contradicted yourself in your own remarks. Edited by Phil’s Barber (18 Feb 2021 1.45pm) I will humbly assert that I was entitled to use that word in respect of rhetorical questions. The debate concerns the game yesterday and should not be de-railed by such exchanges between us two. In the interests of HOL, I will refrain from making any further comments in response to the points you have raised.
Alert a moderator to this post

Willo

South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Feb 21 2.04pm

Originally posted by Phil’s Barber

It was a question Willo not a ‘Charge’ and one I am perfectly entitled to ask seeing as, without clarification, it appears you have completely contradicted yourself in your own remarks.

Edited by Phil’s Barber (18 Feb 2021 1.45pm)

I will humbly assert that I was entitled to use that word in respect of rhetorical questions.

The debate concerns the game yesterday and should not be de-railed by such exchanges between us two.
In the interests of HOL, I will refrain from making any further comments in response to the points you have raised.

Alert a moderator to this post

ex hibitionist Hastings 18 Feb 21 3.22pm
Originally posted by Willo I will humbly assert that I was entitled to use that word in respect of rhetorical questions. The debate concerns the game yesterday and should not be de-railed by such exchanges between us two. In the interests of HOL, I will refrain from making any further comments in response to the points you have raised. may the HOL be with you. Well done, don't get dragged into that tit-for-tat, however it is safe to infer from comments made here to for that defeat to Brighton will render the manager's job less secure, hence efforts to establish whether or not these inferences are valid if related to undue wordiness or vagueness on the specific poster's behalf are reasonable as attempts to establish precise meaning so that appropriate responses can be made thenceforth in full purview of all parties.
Alert a moderator to this post

ex hibitionist

Hastings 18 Feb 21 3.22pm

Send a Private Message to ex hibitionist

Originally posted by Willo

I will humbly assert that I was entitled to use that word in respect of rhetorical questions.

may the HOL be with you. Well done, don't get dragged into that tit-for-tat, however it is safe to infer from comments made here to for that defeat to Brighton will render the manager's job less secure, hence efforts to establish whether or not these inferences are valid if related to undue wordiness or vagueness on the specific poster's behalf are reasonable as attempts to establish precise meaning so that appropriate responses can be made thenceforth in full purview of all parties.

Alert a moderator to this post

Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Feb 21 3.35pm
Originally posted by ex hibitionist may the HOL be with you. Well done, don't get dragged into that tit-for-tat, however it is safe to infer from comments made here to for that defeat to Brighton will render the manager's job less secure, hence efforts to establish whether or not these inferences are valid if related to undue wordiness or vagueness on the specific poster's behalf are reasonable as attempts to establish precise meaning so that appropriate responses can be made thenceforth in full purview of all parties. I got a frisson of excitement at perusing such magniloquence. I bow before your temple and doff my hat in reverence. Edited by Willo (18 Feb 2021 4.28pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

Willo

South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Feb 21 3.35pm

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

I got a frisson of excitement at perusing such magniloquence.
I bow before your temple and doff my hat in reverence.

Edited by Willo (18 Feb 2021 4.28pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Phil’s Barber Crowborough 18 Feb 21 3.46pm
Originally posted by ex hibitionist may the HOL be with you. Well done, don't get dragged into that tit-for-tat, however it is safe to infer from comments made here to for that defeat to Brighton will render the manager's job less secure, hence efforts to establish whether or not these inferences are valid if related to undue wordiness or vagueness on the specific poster's behalf are reasonable as attempts to establish precise meaning so that appropriate responses can be made thenceforth in full purview of all parties. Indeed, and Willo needs to make his mind up because he keeps reminding us that there isn’t currently a managerial vacancy at our club and nor does he expect to see that change any time soon! So what’s it to be Willo? Because so far you seem to be peddling both potential scenarios and yet at the same time declaring you ‘don’t wish to engage in the debate about the future of our manager’? !!!
Alert a moderator to this post

Phil’s Barber

Crowborough 18 Feb 21 3.46pm

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

Indeed, and Willo needs to make his mind up because he keeps reminding us that there isn’t currently a managerial vacancy at our club and nor does he expect to see that change any time soon!

So what’s it to be Willo? Because so far you seem to be peddling both potential scenarios and yet at the same time declaring you ‘don’t wish to engage in the debate about the future of our manager’?
!!!

Alert a moderator to this post

PatrickA London 18 Feb 21 3.57pm
WIllo is Hodgson’s biggest fan. I’ve been trying for some time to get him off that fence but with no joy. He claims not to be Hodgson’s defence lawyer, but he is definitely a witness for the defence.
Alert a moderator to this post

PatrickA

London 18 Feb 21 3.57pm

WIllo is Hodgson’s biggest fan.
I’ve been trying for some time to get him off that fence but with no joy.
He claims not to be Hodgson’s defence lawyer, but he is definitely a witness for the defence.

Alert a moderator to this post

Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Feb 21 4.08pm
Originally posted by Phil’s Barber Indeed, and Willo needs to make his mind up because he keeps reminding us that there isn’t currently a managerial vacancy at our club and nor does he expect to see that change any time soon! So what’s it to be Willo? Because so far you seem to be peddling both potential scenarios and yet at the same time declaring you ‘don’t wish to engage in the debate about the future of our manager’? !!! With respect, Mr Hodgson who is an experienced respected manager is in situ and I certainly had no desire to respond to "Loser Hodgson will have to go". In the final analysis, Mr Hodgson has met his objective of keeping us in the PL, and on a relative 'Shoestring', and I feel no need to place him in the pillory. Whilst I have been lacerating about some performances, I haven't called for the removal of Mr Hodgson's services or suggested any alternatives.It would have been churlish of me to do so given his achievements at our club. Perhaps I have passed comment on some of the names put forward but in general terms. Nothing more to add on this subject as the 'Thread' is Burnley v Fulham and any comment about the future of Mr Hodgson is tangential to the discussion. Edited by Willo (18 Feb 2021 4.23pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

Willo

South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Feb 21 4.08pm

Originally posted by Phil’s Barber

Indeed, and Willo needs to make his mind up because he keeps reminding us that there isn’t currently a managerial vacancy at our club and nor does he expect to see that change any time soon!

With respect, Mr Hodgson who is an experienced respected manager is in situ and I certainly had no desire to respond to "Loser Hodgson will have to go".

In the final analysis, Mr Hodgson has met his objective of keeping us in the PL, and on a relative 'Shoestring', and I feel no need to place him in the pillory.

Whilst I have been lacerating about some performances, I haven't called for the removal of Mr Hodgson's services or suggested any alternatives.It would have been churlish of me to do so given his achievements at our club.
Perhaps I have passed comment on some of the names put forward but in general terms.

Nothing more to add on this subject as the 'Thread' is Burnley v Fulham and any comment about the future of Mr Hodgson is tangential to the discussion.

Edited by Willo (18 Feb 2021 4.23pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

ex hibitionist Hastings 18 Feb 21 4.25pm
Originally posted by Willo I got a frisson of excitement at perusing such magniloquence. I bow before your temple and doff my hat in reference. thank you, and I think you meant reverence but I'll take reference, all this excitement can lead to spelling mistakes, and we should now turn our attention to Fulham v Sheff Utd, not so much the last chance saloon for the blades, they're well and truly in the departure lounge
Alert a moderator to this post

ex hibitionist

Hastings 18 Feb 21 4.25pm

Originally posted by Willo

I got a frisson of excitement at perusing such magniloquence.
I bow before your temple and doff my hat in reference.

thank you, and I think you meant reverence but I'll take reference, all this excitement can lead to spelling mistakes, and we should now turn our attention to Fulham v Sheff Utd, not so much the last chance saloon for the blades, they're well and truly in the departure lounge

Alert a moderator to this post

Phil’s Barber Crowborough 18 Feb 21 4.35pm
That’s just laughable Willow and downright lame! It was you who took it off course with your ‘I don’t wish to engage in a debate about the future of Mr Hodgson, however...‘ post. Don’t duck the issue now that you’re being pulled up for your previous comments and spare us the nonsensical fancy waffle that you always revert to whenever you have nothing constructive to say.
Alert a moderator to this post

Phil’s Barber

Crowborough 18 Feb 21 4.35pm

That’s just laughable Willow and downright lame! It was you who took it off course with your ‘I don’t wish to engage in a debate about the future of Mr Hodgson, however...‘ post.

Don’t duck the issue now that you’re being pulled up for your previous comments and spare us the nonsensical fancy waffle that you always revert to whenever you have nothing constructive to say.

Alert a moderator to this post

Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Feb 21 4.50pm
I will not be drawn into any tit-for-that as much as some would wish me to do so, hence no responses to posts which de-rail this thread. Returning to Burnley v Fulham, Burnley did have a few missing for the game ie Mee,Wood,Vydra and they lost Gudmundsson to injury during the encounter.Fulham started with the same team as started at Everton. Burnley were the better side,Fulham were not as good as in recent matches and the goal they scored from a corner came about because Brady failed to clear on the line. Lookman who has been effective this season never really caused Burnley any problems.
Alert a moderator to this post

Willo

South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Feb 21 4.50pm

I will not be drawn into any tit-for-that as much as some would wish me to do so, hence no responses to posts which de-rail this thread.

Returning to Burnley v Fulham, Burnley did have a few missing for the game ie Mee,Wood,Vydra and they lost Gudmundsson to injury during the encounter.Fulham started with the same team as started at Everton.
Burnley were the better side,Fulham were not as good as in recent matches and the goal they scored from a corner came about because Brady failed to clear on the line.
Lookman who has been effective this season never really caused Burnley any problems.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 4 of 4 << First < 1 2 3 4

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Burnley v Fulham

Site Map

Sponsors