I do actually provide "Details" and opinions both mine directly or those expressed by others relevant to the subject matter and of course open to debate.

I suspect that this might add more value than the constant sniping at those one considers a 'Bete Noire'.

By the way this thread pertains to 'Conor Gallagher'.

Edited by Willo (12 Mar 2021 11.09am)

Heres a question that has been baffling me . When i said that we should get Bats and Gallagher both on loan a few on HOL said that as a rule a prem club could not get more than one loanee from another prem club , so we went with ( for some strange reason ) Bats even though Connor had the medical with us . How is it then that West Brom have both Connor and RLC on loan from Chelski ?

Ooops Thanks

It's a big yes from me. McCarthy going.

Him and Lundstrum added would give us a much needed boost in midfield energy. Now just another 4 or 5 positions to improve

that's unfair, and you dug out a load of examples of Willo's comments and reposted them to make a point, must have taken a lot of time and effort to do something wholly inappropriate for a moderator.

As for Connor Gallacher the game was too boring for me to watch, had one eye on the gee gees and kept fazing out due to slight intoxication and the early signs of old age, so I didn't see enough to make too much of a judgement, from what I did see I wasn't overly impressed - need to see more, or maybe Willo could give me his considered opinion.

In my humble judgement I have concluded that Gallagher did not have one of his better games against us.

I have witnessed him in recent games and he has not been that impressive but he is playing in a team that have been struggling all season.

Edited by Willo (14 Mar 2021 10.23am)