Plymouth shooting
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 DanH Online  SW2 19 Aug 21 4.02pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
if you look online, our islamic terrorists ? they seem to be either single Incels or got a young wife and a whole clatter of kids. not so many terrorists with a childless longterm girlfriend. I think bizarrely we’re kind of on the same wavelength here, although as always your point is difficult to actually decipher. I think there’s probably a lot of things common that the Plymouth shooter had that the Manchester bomber had, religion aside. Edited by DanH (19 Aug 2021 4.03pm)
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Stirlingsays 19 Aug 21 4.08pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
I think bizarrely we’re kind of on the same wavelength here, although as always your point is difficult to actually decipher. I think there’s probably a lot of things common that the Plymouth shooter had that the Manchester bomber had, religion aside. Edited by DanH (19 Aug 2021 4.03pm) Some. Easier to recruit. Still, it's also true that members have been highly educated and quite successful. It's not an incel army....Religion finds all types. Every group has an intelligentsia......A high or higher IQ doesn't mean cultural or political agreement. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 Aug 2021 4.10pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH Online SW2 19 Aug 21 4.12pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Some. Easier to recruit. Still, it's also true that members have been highly educated and quite successful. It's not an incel army....Religion finds all types. Every group has an intelligentsia......A high or higher IQ doesn't mean cultural or political agreement. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 Aug 2021 4.10pm) Yep completely agree. Genuine question as well as I know you put a lot to IQ; do you think IQ automatically means someone who should be in charge of making decisions? Or is EQ equally important? Edited by DanH (19 Aug 2021 4.12pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 19 Aug 21 4.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
Yep completely agree. Genuine question as well as I know you put a lot to IQ; do you think IQ automatically means someone who should be in charge of making decisions? Or is EQ equally important? Edited by DanH (19 Aug 2021 4.12pm) It's a very good question. I think the manner of the job matters....obvioiusly you don't want highly intelligent sociopaths. I'd say that If the decisions involve building a bridge or something technical like that, then as long as the law is followed then yes IQ matters more than EI. If the job involves people, then having social skills will matter more. Not that from my perspective that those skills means someone's a particular type. It's job dependent......At the very top end you'd hope that meritocracy meant that they had both. Still, when it comes down to it high IQ matters more.....too much empathy is cufflinks to shirt fronts, in other words decisions made purely on emotion are rarely good ones.....though a very high IQ is nearly always a life benefit in comparison to its alternative. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 Aug 2021 4.25pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH Online SW2 19 Aug 21 4.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
It's a very good question. I think the manner of the job matters....obvioiusly you don't want highly intelligent sociopaths. I'd say that If the decisions involve building a bridge or something technical like that, then as long as the law is followed then yes IQ matters more than EI. If the job involves people, then having social skills will matter more. Not that from my perspective that those skills means someone's a particular type. It's job dependent......At the very top end you'd hope that meritocracy meant that they had both. Still, when it comes down to it high IQ matters more.....too much empathy is cufflinks to shirt fronts, in other words decisions made purely on emotion are rarely good ones.....though a very high IQ is nearly always a life benefit in comparison to its alternative. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 Aug 2021 4.25pm) I agree with you on about 90% of that I’d say. I think the only bit I differ to on that is what you call emotion I call empathy, which is a huge part of leadership. Also, unless something is fully automated or AI smart enough to do it then it involves humans to some extent so it will always be crucial. Until the robots are smarter than us anyway. Edited by DanH (19 Aug 2021 4.46pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 19 Aug 21 5.12pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
I agree with you on about 90% of that I’d say. I think the only bit I differ to on that is what you call emotion I call empathy, which is a huge part of leadership. Also, unless something is fully automated or AI smart enough to do it then it involves humans to some extent so it will always be crucial. Until the robots are smarter than us anyway. Edited by DanH (19 Aug 2021 4.46pm) Probably not a long way off. Mark Zuckerberg being the first.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 becky over the moon 19 Aug 21 5.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I think Elon Musk may have an edge......
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
| DanH Online SW2 19 Aug 21 5.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
You’d still claim you were smarter
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Matov 19 Aug 21 5.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This bloke as an 'Incel' terrorist spiel is utter bulls***. He shot two men dead. And a little kid. These Incel freaks are meant to have problems with women right? He was a f*** up who lost the plot. The REAL issue is how the hell he was allowed to get that shotgun back. That is where all the focus should be.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH Online SW2 19 Aug 21 5.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Matov
This bloke as an 'Incel' terrorist spiel is utter bulls***. He shot two men dead. And a little kid. These Incel freaks are meant to have problems with women right? He was a f*** up who lost the plot. The REAL issue is how the hell he was allowed to get that shotgun back. That is where all the focus should be. Yes completely the biggest issue. But the other issue is still a big issue.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Matov 19 Aug 21 5.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
Yes completely the biggest issue. But the other issue is still a big issue.
They just have mother issues. Does that mean they should just be ignored? Then no. But I suspect the pathology is far more akin to Serial Killers than terrorists. These gimps have always existed. Only difference now is that can rant on message boards with each other. A manifestation of the modern world us lot are probably guilty than most in embracing whole heartedly, hence this conversation. You want him classified as a terrorist because he is white Dan. And that can then assuage the unease you feel about the predominance of non-white terrorists over the last few decades. Anders Brevik was a terrorist. He attacked people based on a political ideology. This moron was just a fruit-loop. But a fruit-loop with a gun. That's the issue.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
BlueJay  UK 19 Aug 21 6.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Matov
This bloke as an 'Incel' terrorist spiel is utter bulls***. He shot two men dead. And a little kid. These Incel freaks are meant to have problems with women right? He was a f*** up who lost the plot. The REAL issue is how the hell he was allowed to get that shotgun back. That is where all the focus should be. Bang on. This effort we see to lump in all of sundry (those on the left who seek to blame 'INCELS' and the far right, and those on the right who seek to link it to 'feminists' and 'alphabet soup' types) fail to see that even the most ardent basement dwellers very rarely behave as this guy did. There's a bit of a difference between being a dropout, and loading a gun and killing a kid. Hopefully those desperate to endlessly politicise to their own advantage will instead for once just take these utterly tragic events at face value.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.