Difference being with me it would be wholly inaccurate, and with you, based on your behaviour it clearly is not. You don't give plenty of time and space to the likes of neo nazi Mark Collett if you're 'hanging with the homies' the next day. The laughable scope and allowances you give your own views compared to your hyper negative fixation on mundane views has been oft highlighted and rightly so. No-one open to others in a half way normal and balanced way goes that route. Since you have an eternal issue with minorities, you get to realise than in indulging at the fringes you are clearly, provably much more in the minority than any colour or creed you waste your time obsessing over. As such, expect to receive what you dish out.

You just like to blot out the aspects of inconvenience to yourself. As I say, beyond personal choices of who you procreate with or how you vote in terms of immigration policy, none of this is in any way within your control. As such part of a typical persons thinking factors in to how their views will be received. Like it or not, your comments essentially rank the progeny of people based on their race. That is not something that 'works' in real world interactions, which is why this is your outlet for it.

Issues such as population, fertility and genetics have arisen directly in connection with the discussion of immigration.

(this was meant to be a response to Stirling's post above, for some reason, it posted to BlueJay... sorry about that)

Create a thread conversant to this subject.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

No need. My comments are statements of public fact.

That is what this thread is essentially about and, as you say, a far more immediate issue.

Stirls is getting upset, and I don't want to be further complicit in diverting the thread, so it's boat people or nothing from now on.