Another video from Jimmy Dore destroying the 'Russia-gate' narrative.

[Link]

If there is still anybody out there who still believes in these lies watch it. All the truth about who funded what and who lied to whom is mostly out there.

This shouldn't be about left or right, it should be about a commitment to the truth.

Personally I think there are areas of attack that are legitimate with politicans and parties and that includes Trump....Most of them are corrupted by finance and elites.....indeed, they don't get to be selected without supporting that system.

However, it didn't take long to know that 'Russia-gate' was BS and there needs to be accountability over it.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Nov 2021 3.16pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Anyone reading WE on this who hasn't already watched the videos, I say watch Jimmy Dore on Russia-gate then compare it to WE's commentary.

Dore is the guy who spat in Alex Jones's face, he's very much on the left.

And Dore does not like Trump one bit....but he's honest and he's against the elites whether they sit with the Democrats or Republicans.

And the elites hate anyone from any party who threatens them....it's why they hated Trump and loved Clinton.

But it's all the same, they will support anyone who supports them, which is why Trump quickly changed from an anti elite 'American carnage' first term president to the milk toast suck up second term one.

Hell, it's not about Trump, he's the past....it's about liars being held accountable for lies and not being rewarded for them.

The Russia gate lie damaged international relations and robbed the American tax payer of way over ten million dollars.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Nov 2021 10.59pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

By all means watch Jimmy Dore, but before you do get to know something about him. He is not someone I am familiar with, so I did a little research. Odd, would be something of an understatement. He seems to love controversy and taking up positions, not many of which turn out to be accurate. Bear that in mind when reviewing his contribution to this matter. Just remember he is an entertainer, rewarded on viewing figures. Controversy pays.

No-one argues that someone who has maliciously provided false information should not be held accountable. However, I hope the truth will be determined "in camera". Sources need to be protected, and sometimes cut-outs required to obscure who they are. This is especially important when dealing with Putin, who is brutal when dealing with anyone who briefs against him, as we all know.

In any event, this was only one part of the Steele report, and the Steele report itself was only providing corroboratory evidence to what the security services in the 5 eyes already knew. The Steele report was political, designed to influence the public. That's true, but it was wise to do so, to try to inform the electorate of what was on offer. Once though the scale of the problem was known, it was shared with the security forces. Mueller was a reaction to that. A reaction which is still quietly reverberating.

So there is a great deal more here than just one potentially tainted source. This is a castle built on solid ground, which a few buckets of mud isn't going to knock down.

By the way, Trump wasn't a second term President of any kind! Thankfully.

Of course, it's "Russiagate" itself, and not any lies about it, which has damaged international relations. I cannot think of any countries, Russia and North Korea excepted, who would welcome Trump back again. You could almost hear the collective sigh of relief around the world when he lost.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I expected that when I wrote it. I am only surprised it took so long.

The difference is, I don't have any financial incentive to be controversial. Doubtless you think I am, just for its own sake, but I assure you my opinions are sincere, and the positions I take are much more often proved right. Not that I expect too many here to accept that. Just look at Brexit!

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

The direction of travel is clear. The broken promises obvious.

All were forecast. Nothing wrong yet. Nothing right from the Brexiteers. It's still only jam tomorrow from them.

You keep believing if you want to, but I predict the pool of people who agree with you will dry up fast and just become a nasty, stinky pool with only the dregs left.

Those who cling to the belief that Brexit will "work out fine, just be patient" remind me of the captain on the Titanic, crying "it was only a little iceberg" as his ship went down.

Brexit was a huge iceberg, with so much unseen by the Brexiteers it beggars belief.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Brexit isn't great. It's a disaster. We will adapt because we have no other choice, but that can never disguise the stupidity.

Our children and grandchildren are already mad with us. Your legacy will be that they won't forgive you for ruining their future, and I don't blame them. People over 60 should have been denied a vote!!!!!

I don't recall giving any advice about mass immigration. If it ever happens, I might.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.