You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > No Vax Novac
April 19 2024 3.33pm

No Vax Novac

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 10 of 14 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 16 Jan 22 11.00pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Well, you and everyone else won't be vaccinated for that much longer and this rather strange way of viewing the world will be all very temporary.

Viewing the world as an interdependent entity, where an individual's decisions impact everyone else, where health services are stretched to breaking point, so need protection from the selfish isn't the least strange.

What's strange is how some people refuse to acknowledge this.

This will last as long as it needs to last. The expectation being that once herd immunity is established we will all be offered annual covid vaccinations alongside the flu one. We can then ignore those who refused to participate in the national effort. Ignore, but never forget.

If it was down to me, I would make it a legitimate reason for employers to discriminate when reviewing job applications. If an applicant had refused the Covid vaccine, without a medical exemption, then they would likely do so again should a future pandemic occur, thus risking being off work more frequently and threatening the welfare of others. Everything else being equal I would rather employ someone who demonstrates responsibility by being vaccinated than someone who doesn't. So I think it's a reasonable question to ask.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 16 Jan 22 11.12pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

If it was down to me, I would make it a legitimate reason for employers to discriminate when reviewing job applications.

It is and I have. Only discrimination due to protected characteristics is illegal

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Online Flag 16 Jan 22 11.20pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Viewing the world as an interdependent entity, where an individual's decisions impact everyone else, where health services are stretched to breaking point, so need protection from the selfish isn't the least strange.

What's strange is how some people refuse to acknowledge this.

This will last as long as it needs to last. The expectation being that once herd immunity is established we will all be offered annual covid vaccinations alongside the flu one. We can then ignore those who refused to participate in the national effort. Ignore, but never forget.

If it was down to me, I would make it a legitimate reason for employers to discriminate when reviewing job applications. If an applicant had refused the Covid vaccine, without a medical exemption, then they would likely do so again should a future pandemic occur, thus risking being off work more frequently and threatening the welfare of others. Everything else being equal I would rather employ someone who demonstrates responsibility by being vaccinated than someone who doesn't. So I think it's a reasonable question to ask.

Well, it's great that feck all is down to you isn't it.

Because if things were down to me, little old you wouldn't be too chuffed about stuff either.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 16 Jan 22 11.32pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

It is and I have. Only discrimination due to protected characteristics is illegal

Good to know. I wonder how important this will become in the coming years.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 16 Jan 22 11.45pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Well, it's great that feck all is down to you isn't it.

Because if things were down to me, little old you wouldn't be too chuffed about stuff either.

From what we've just be told it doesn't need to be down to me! It already is.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Online Flag 16 Jan 22 11.46pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

As far as I'm aware there has been no change to legislation over vaccination and employment.

When it comes to tribunals I imagine in the current atmosphere that care-homes would be seen more favourably in this matter over other jobs.....obviously not employing someone being far easier to muddy than cutting current staff.

I would imagine that this isn't an area that government would wish to dip its toes into.....as the lawyers would have a field day.

Authoritarian fantasists can dream whatever dreams they wish....unless a virus or variant turns up that worries government considerably more than the strongest versions of covid then they are unlikely to get their wish.....they should have learnt something from the recent Tory rebellion....Government MPs are obviously not happy with the route that he so obviously desires.

It shows up all the waffle they waffled over the NHS for what it is....because such a requirement would see very important staff, who can't just be replaced, sacked and that....in my view, that would not only be idiotic but disastrous.

Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Jan 2022 11.50pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 17 Jan 22 12.12am Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

As far as I'm aware there has been no change to legislation over vaccination and employment.

When it comes to tribunals I imagine in the current atmosphere that care-homes would be seen more favourably in this matter over other jobs.....obviously not employing someone being far easier to muddy than cutting current staff.

I would imagine that this isn't an area that government would wish to dip its toes into.....as the lawyers would have a field day.

Authoritarian fantasists can dream whatever dreams they wish....unless a virus or variant turns up that worries government considerably more than the strongest versions of covid then they are unlikely to get their wish.....they should have learnt something from the recent Tory rebellion....Government MPs are obviously not happy with the route that he so obviously desires.

It shows up all the waffle they waffled over the NHS for what it is....because such a requirement would see very important staff, who can't just be replaced, sacked and that....in my view, that would not only be idiotic but disastrous.

Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Jan 2022 11.50pm)

You appear confused. You can stipulate it is a condition of employment to be vaccinated for new starters. Hard to dismiss an existing employee for that once they have served two years though other than in care homes and shortly the NHS.

It is the law to be vaccinated when working in a Care Home so any dismissal on those grounds could not be challenged in a Tribunal.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Online Flag 17 Jan 22 12.19am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

You appear confused. You can stipulate it is a condition of employment to be vaccinated for new starters. Hard to dismiss an existing employee for that once they have served two years though other than in care homes and shortly the NHS.

It is the law to be vaccinated when working in a Care Home so any dismissal on those grounds could not be challenged in a Tribunal.


I can see some of that being challenged....also some of it is just a repeat of what I said.

To the point, your mate was talking generally and your initial post to him was quite happy to disingenuously feed his nonsense.....no doubt as it is nonsense you yourself wish for.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View grumpymort's Profile grumpymort Flag US/Thailand/UK 17 Jan 22 2.46am Send a Private Message to grumpymort Add grumpymort as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

My wife is a nurse on a cardiac ward in a large hospital so she isn't on the front line of critical care. Last week they admitted a patient to her ward who hadn't been vaccinated but who had contracted covid on top of the existing heart problems resulting in all of the nurses on that ward catching it and now having to self isolate.

Wifey has had all three vaccinations but is still quite badly ill although not ill enough for hospitalisations thank goodness so the unvaccinated are affecting others


This is because the vaccines are useless for delta and omicron read the research Pfizer and Moderna both are the highest rated offer some protection for upto 30 days only and then those people who had those boosts get infected end up getting very ill not the case for people who was not vaccinated almost all of them have reported it as like a cold (again the extreme case will be people with other health issues)

Check out the nice study by the danes name is below it shows this but if you do read it dont do like a lot of people here read the conclusion which shows the opposite of what the data does raw data is what is important not words.

Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series

 


(VPN) - [Link]
(Alt VPN) - [Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View grumpymort's Profile grumpymort Flag US/Thailand/UK 17 Jan 22 2.56am Send a Private Message to grumpymort Add grumpymort as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

You appear confused. You can stipulate it is a condition of employment to be vaccinated for new starters. Hard to dismiss an existing employee for that once they have served two years though other than in care homes and shortly the NHS.

It is the law to be vaccinated when working in a Care Home so any dismissal on those grounds could not be challenged in a Tribunal.

BS you again showing you have no clue what you are talking about

The vaccines in the UK are for emergency/temp use only they are not fully licensed you can not force people to take them and with the evidence as well that it does not stop spread in a court case you would rip them apart.

The is not ebola or bubonic plague they was a real threat the numbers prove it this is not no increase in death rate has occurred go and look at the raw data of deaths and do the math.

 


(VPN) - [Link]
(Alt VPN) - [Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Helmet46's Profile Helmet46 Flag Croydon 17 Jan 22 7.33am Send a Private Message to Helmet46 Add Helmet46 as a friend

Originally posted by grumpymort


This is because the vaccines are useless for delta and omicron read the research Pfizer and Moderna both are the highest rated offer some protection for upto 30 days only and then those people who had those boosts get infected end up getting very ill not the case for people who was not vaccinated almost all of them have reported it as like a cold (again the extreme case will be people with other health issues)

Check out the nice study by the danes name is below it shows this but if you do read it dont do like a lot of people here read the conclusion which shows the opposite of what the data does raw data is what is important not words.

Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series


You mean this study?

[Link]

I’ve read and I must confess I’m struggling to see that it shows that the unvaccinated only have cold like symptoms from Omicron and Delta, whilst boosted people get very ill. Genuine question (as I have no medical knowledge and assuming this is the paper you were referring to) what bits in this seemingly short paper articulate the findings you state above? (I appreciate I’ve probably done exactly what you said not to do, but that’s no medical knowledge coming out again).

Edited by Helmet46 (17 Jan 2022 7.38am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 17 Jan 22 10.01am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays


I can see some of that being challenged....also some of it is just a repeat of what I said.

To the point, your mate was talking generally and your initial post to him was quite happy to disingenuously feed his nonsense.....no doubt as it is nonsense you yourself wish for.

It's a long way from nonsense!

Whilst it's true that this appears not to have yet been tested in either a Court or Tribunal, and that legal opinion is not yet settled, the general opinion seems to be that it is reasonable for an employer to include a requirement to be vaccinated in their recruitment policy. You can read some of the reasoning here:-

[Link]

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 10 of 14 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > No Vax Novac