According to the last set of accounts the shareholders have loaned a little over £49m to the company and it is highly probable that the monies have been injected in proportion to their shareholdings although AN Idiot esq would probably disagree as is his wont.

We don't know how much they paid for their shares as the purchase of shares in a private company is a matter between the individuals involved

Today's Telegraph has a detailed piece about the workings at Palace, with the 4 major shareholders, Parish, Blitzer,Harris and Textor having equal voting rights, but day to day management of the club being left to Parish.
The article suggests that Textor has a 40% share of the club, that Blitzer and Harris hold 38% between them, Parish holds 11% (I thought he held 18%) with rest being made up of smaller shareholders.
The article suggests that the model works well currently with a trust in how Parish manages the club.
However, if Blitzer and Harris dispose of their 38% to proceed with the Chelsea offer then this could lead to uncertainty in the event that the new investors want more say in the day to day running of the club.
As always the devil would be in the detail.
Textor role could be key too as the largest shareholder and it could be that he would seek to add to his holding.
I've been through the days of Bloye, Noades, Goldberg and Jordan so not much surprises with Palace.

I think Abramovich,s arrival kinda signalled the beginning of the end for ordinary people to have the possibility to buy into their local club (if that club was in the PL) the sheer amount of money involved in modern times is just mind blowing for most of us to even think about.

Just as a question - does anyone know what it would cost to buy
just 1 share in CPFC (if it was possible to roll up at CPFC offices & put your money on the table)

Textor will buy them out and hopefully leave Parish in charge

4 fans did buy the club and saved us from disappearing, its been well documented.

Is being a sceptic worse than going septic?