You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Akshata Murty tax affairs
April 24 2024 10.06am

Akshata Murty tax affairs

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 5 of 23 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

 

View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 11 Apr 22 12.12pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

It's incredible how fine some people are with being ripped off, as long as it's someone rich and on their 'side'.

Absolutely no shame nor principle.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
BlueJay Flag UK 11 Apr 22 12.26pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle


Ensuring that those who make the rules don't do so in a corrupt way can only be done via stringent oversight, freedom of information and investigative journalism in an environment of press freedom. Having parts of the media controlled by those who also stand to profit from corrupt practices isn't healthy, but so long as it all isn't we should be OK.

Sounds about right, yes. Too much influence results in abuse of it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 11 Apr 22 12.44pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by BlueJay

Well, I'm self employed and I pay precisely what I should, but then you are likely right to be honest, and I am known to do my best then get treated like a mug .

But I mean technically, I would think what she did 'is' tax avoidance isnt it?

Not if she followed the rules and didn't break the law.
If the system is in place to do this then change it.
The problem is that farther down the line the changes WILL affect normal workers; which invariably will be met with condemnation even though the majority wanted it.
There are reasons this is allowed and I'm not learned enough to know why and how it works.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 11 Apr 22 12.45pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

It's incredible how fine some people are with being ripped off, as long as it's someone rich and on their 'side'.

Absolutely no shame nor principle.

Who's being ripped off?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
BlueJay Flag UK 11 Apr 22 12.50pm

Originally posted by cryrst

Not if she followed the rules and didn't break the law.
If the system is in place to do this then change it.
The problem is that farther down the line the changes WILL affect normal workers; which invariably will be met with condemnation even though the majority wanted it.
There are reasons this is allowed and I'm not learned enough to know why and how it works.

I'm certainly not saying that she's done anything illegal, rather that the behaviour of both her and her husband, especially in his position, is unethical.

The wider issue is that clicking our fingers and closing these types of loopholes isn't something that's easy for the man on the street to do, as they don't exist to benefit the man the street. Those in power use mechanisms of their own creation to shelter their wealth. We have no meaningful part or place in that conversation unfortunately (as we appear to have no power to stop any these abuses or those from corporations) and I very much doubt it will change.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 11 Apr 22 1.40pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Who's being ripped off?

Most of the population.

I already know you're happy about it given your enjoyment in defending absolutely everything this government does while they continue to do nothing for you.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Jimenez's Profile Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 11 Apr 22 2.22pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

I fail to see how someone who is supposedly worth 200M & is married to a Billionairess needs to pull a tax payers salary of 150K a year

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 11 Apr 22 2.59pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Jimenez

I fail to see how someone who is supposedly worth 200M & is married to a Billionairess needs to pull a tax payers salary of 150K a year

He's entitled to it but the more I think about it, the more it stinks.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 11 Apr 22 5.19pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Jimenez

I fail to see how someone who is supposedly worth 200M & is married to a Billionairess needs to pull a tax payers salary of 150K a year

That’s his walking around money. Having an ATM in the Cayman Islands is a bit inconvenient.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 11 Apr 22 5.35pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

Most of the population.

I already know you're happy about it given your enjoyment in defending absolutely everything this government does while they continue to do nothing for you.

Nope not at all.
What I do know is that a three day week f***ed up a lot more people. You are too young to know.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 11 Apr 22 5.48pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Nope not at all.
What I do know is that a three day week f***ed up a lot more people. You are too young to know.

Ye Gods just thinking that is nearly 50 years ago.

And it was a tory government I'm afraid C.

Nothing much changes.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Matov's Profile Matov Flag 11 Apr 22 6.12pm Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

LOL. Lets be honest here, some foreign taking advantage of a tax loophole that both major parties have allowed to exist for a long, long time by way of pleasing doners ain't really the story.

The story is who leaked it and why?

And the answer lies in a photograph taken from a balcony in Downing street of some people enjoying lock-down drinks in the garden.


Revenge is a dish best eaten...you know the score.

There are local elections in May. The Tories are expected to get their arses kicked. And voices will be raised about Johnson's leadership (again). Sunak WAS seen as a potential challenger to the throne. Not anymore.

Johnson seems to have gotten his political mojo back. Say what you want about the loathesome arsehole, he knows the game.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 5 of 23 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Akshata Murty tax affairs