You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Akshata Murty tax affairs
March 29 2024 9.17am

Akshata Murty tax affairs

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 18 of 23 < 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 >

 

View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 18 Apr 22 12.28am Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

As a non-resident she has no right to NHS services unless she pays for them.

That must be awkward.

Edited by Mapletree (17 Apr 2022 12.17pm)

What? Now, come on, is she a resident or a non-resident? Make your mind up.

You think she didn't go to a private clinic to give birth? And all the ante/post natal treatment? And schooling the kids at fee payiig schools?

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 18 Apr 22 12.33am Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

cut

I note that you have no integrity. You make a false statement, you can't back it up, so you ignore the poster.

You are becoming like BJ.

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
BlueJay Flag UK 18 Apr 22 1.05am

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

"Vast numbers"? Really? Or just the SJW idiots.

You did indeed quote my posts, but for some reason felt the need to inform me of what you think they mean, instead of what I typed (which is a recurrent theme!).

And now, unsurprisingly, you flounce off again.

Here are your own words:

"Any remittance that she pays is likely more than the average outraged idiot pays. Nobody else really cares."

"If enough of you outraged idiots assemble outside Parliament and protest about the non dom law, it will get changed."

"Life's not fair, but neither are humans. .. Start a movement. Get all your toddler mates to help."


"I didn't call anyone interested in changing anything 'outraged idiots'. I advised the idiots to change the things they are outraged about."

????


Rudi is entirely right. You called tax payers and those protesting who take issue, outraged idiots. Public statement of fact I'm afraid.

The conversation is primarily about how in a two party system, clicking your fingers and removing corruption is far from a formality. It's not an 'SJW' issue, it's systemic and an an extent happens across the political spectrum.


Edited by BlueJay (18 Apr 2022 1.14am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 18 Apr 22 1.20am Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by BlueJay

Here are your own words:

"Any remittance that she pays is likely more than the average outraged idiot pays. Nobody else really cares."

"If enough of you outraged idiots assemble outside Parliament and protest about the non dom law, it will get changed."

"Life's not fair, but neither are humans. .. Start a movement. Get all your toddler mates to help."


"I didn't "call anyone interested in changing anything 'outraged idiots'". I advised the idiots to change the things they are outraged about. "

????


Rudi is entirely right. You called tax payers and those protesting who take issue, outraged idiots. Public statement of fact I'm afraid.

The conversation is primarily about how in a two party system, clicking your fingers and removing corruption is far from a formality. It's not an 'SJW' issue, it's systemic and an an extent happens across the political spectrum.


Where have I mentioned taxpayers? Highlight the word "taxpayer" in any of those statements. Everyone pays tax. But not all taxpayers are outraged idiots. Only you and your chums. Everyone breathes air, why not accuse me of insulting hardworking air breathers.

Where have I called protesters "outraged idiots"? The key phrase is "If enough of you outraged idiots assemble outside Parliament and protest about the non dom law, it will get changed". As in, if the idiots go and protest, they will have done something, instead of being just idiots.

Comprehension really isn't your thing is it.

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
BlueJay Flag UK 18 Apr 22 1.29am

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Where have I mentioned taxpayers? Highlight the word "taxpayer" in any of those statements. Everyone pays tax. But not all taxpayers are outraged idiots. Only you and your chums. Everyone breathes air, why not accuse me of insulting hardworking air breathers.

Where have I called protesters "outraged idiots"? The key phrase is "If enough of you outraged idiots assemble outside Parliament and protest about the non dom law, it will get changed". As in, if the idiots go and protest, they will have done something, instead of being just idiots.

Comprehension really isn't your thing is it.

You say that she likely pays 'more' than 'the average outraged idiot pays', implying that said 'idiots' more than likely pay some tax, hence are tax payers. You're being purposefully disingenuous.

You state that it will be 'outraged idiots' assembling outside parliament. You also call those wishing to start a movement or react in some way 'toddlers'.

You're now saying that they are still in fact idiots in your view, but may also be 'something else'. It's absurd comment, after absurd comment.

There's no point going back and forth on facts.

Edited by BlueJay (18 Apr 2022 1.39am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 18 Apr 22 1.56am Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by BlueJay

You say that she likely pays 'more' than 'the average outraged idiot pays', implying that said 'idiots' more than likely pay some tax, hence are tax payers. You're being purposefully disingenuous.

You state that it will be 'outraged idiots' assembling outside parliament. You also calls those wishing to start a movement or react in some way 'toddlers'.

You're now saying that they are in fact idiots, but may also be 'something else'. It's absurd comment, after absurd comment.

There's no point going back and forth on facts.

Fcuk me! This takes lying to the next level. All of this is in this thread.

I originally said she pays "Not the millions that everyone expects her to pay of course, but far more than Joe Public pays individually." April 11th. You disagreed, and I, basically, called you an outraged idiot. Although, I now realise that it missed you.

I didn't state that anyone would assemble outside Parliament.

I didn't call anyone a toddler. I replied to EverybodyDannsNow on April 14th, as he said a 4 year old could pick apart the idea of 'if it's legal, it's fair' (I have no idea why he thinks that anyone said that), but I suggested his toddler mates might help. He brought up 4 year olds.

So, let's actually set out the facts as they were written. Rather than the revised edition of facts as presented by you.

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
BlueJay Flag UK 18 Apr 22 7.23am

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Fcuk me! This takes lying to the next level. All of this is in this thread.

I originally said she pays "Not the millions that everyone expects her to pay of course, but far more than Joe Public pays individually." April 11th. You disagreed, and I, basically, called you an outraged idiot. Although, I now realise that it missed you.

"Any remittance that she pays is likely more than the average outraged idiot pays. Nobody else really cares."

"If enough of you outraged idiots assemble outside Parliament and protest about the non dom law, it will get changed."

None of that related to one person. You have literally said that people that have a problem with this are outraged idiots, and that it's indicative of who would protest it.

"I didn't state that anyone would assemble outside Parliament."

See above. You're arguing with yourself again.


On this very page you say "if the idiots go and protest, they will have done something, instead of being just idiots." so you're still sweepingly calling people with a view contrary to yours idiots (while simultaneously being affronted that people would accuse you of that). You can't get enough of doing so, and across multiple threads have this ridiculous 'prove that I mean what I've clearly just said' approach.

"I didn't call anyone a toddler"... "I suggested his toddler mates might help. He brought up 4 year olds."

Aka you did call people that.

I don't care what you call people, but you repeatedly come out with this outlandish stuff and are then indignant when any of what you say is quoted back. These coin toss takes with accompanying endless pages of pearl clutching and claims of "lies! misrepresentation!" that follow are a complete waste of time. Post what you're happy with and actually believe - it's a bit late to rewind after the fact.


Edited by BlueJay (18 Apr 2022 5.21pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 18 Apr 22 9.26am Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

OK, hands up, I meant 'be treated as', not 'become'. My bad.

Whatever, she pays more than you do at the moment, and when she dies, will have paid far, far more into the UK coffers than you, unless she leaves the country.

No, she doesn’t pay more than me

As far as I can see she pays no tax. The charge she pays is lower than my tax, even not taking into account NIC.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 18 Apr 22 10.07am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

I note that you have no integrity. You make a false statement, you can't back it up, so you ignore the poster.

You are becoming like BJ.

What are you drivelling on about now? You post one word from one of my posts and that bilge. You carry on defending and apologising for the Sunaks. We know who the mug is.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 18 Apr 22 10.13am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Shouldn’t really give someone the time of day while they sit there at home calling anyone an idiot for having an opinion or being angry about anything that is blatantly wrong and wrong by design and fine with the person(s) in power using it. I expect he picks up The Daily Mail frothing at the mouth every single morning without fail. But everyone else is an outraged idiot for not accepting the status quo or believing they can change all the unfairness in a century old two party system. Idiot? Ironically THE ranter.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HKOwen's Profile HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 18 Apr 22 10.14am Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

What, in Hong Kong?

She paid the ‘annual charge’ but not tax on her earnings. Do keep up.

Incorrect again, she paid UK tax on her UK earnings in addition to paying a fee for non dom status.

She has UK income from at least one company, Catamaran Ventures UK and paid tax on that.

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 18 Apr 22 10.16am Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

What? Now, come on, is she a resident or a non-resident? Make your mind up.

You think she didn't go to a private clinic to give birth? And all the ante/post natal treatment? And schooling the kids at fee payiig schools?

May I suggest you occasionally check facts. Google is your friend

She is indeed resident but not ordinarily resident.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 18 of 23 < 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Akshata Murty tax affairs