The Great Reset

Page 4 of 39 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

BlueJay UK 07 Jun 22 10.07pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays I'm not going to bite. I don't care whether you bite or not. Beyond whatever pitiful personal curriculum you can indocrinate with, who your child ends up with as partners as an adult, has f*** all to do with you. Your own fringe politics do not extent to controlling their lives and this idea you have that's it's preferable for you if they're in this racial alignment or that, is the polar opposite of what I believe. Making some kind of judgement of grandchildren based on their race is hardly something that's going to be of benefit to your family. But then from your conduct here, that doesn't form part of your politics over people criteria anyway does it, so it doesn't factor in. Edited by BlueJay (07 Jun 2022 10.17pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

BlueJay

UK 07 Jun 22 10.07pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I'm not going to bite.

I don't care whether you bite or not. Beyond whatever pitiful personal curriculum you can indocrinate with, who your child ends up with as partners as an adult, has f*** all to do with you.

Your own fringe politics do not extent to controlling their lives and this idea you have that's it's preferable for you if they're in this racial alignment or that, is the polar opposite of what I believe. Making some kind of judgement of grandchildren based on their race is hardly something that's going to be of benefit to your family. But then from your conduct here, that doesn't form part of your politics over people criteria anyway does it, so it doesn't factor in.

Edited by BlueJay (07 Jun 2022 10.17pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

BlueJay UK 07 Jun 22 10.15pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Only 7% of couples are interracial. Clearly, the vast majority prefer their own. Most people in this country would classify as white. Therefore it's a hardly a sensible argument to assume that because most couples aren't mixed race it indicates that 93% 'prefer their own'. People can marry and procreate who they want of any race (same, different, who cares), and unlike how you appear to perceive others, their children are as much part of this land as yours. You get to make a decision about who 'you' procreate with, not decisions on behalf of anyone else, so it's a pointless discussion to begin with. Edited by BlueJay (07 Jun 2022 10.19pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

BlueJay

UK 07 Jun 22 10.15pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Only 7% of couples are interracial. Clearly, the vast majority prefer their own.

Most people in this country would classify as white. Therefore it's a hardly a sensible argument to assume that because most couples aren't mixed race it indicates that 93% 'prefer their own'.

People can marry and procreate who they want of any race (same, different, who cares), and unlike how you appear to perceive others, their children are as much part of this land as yours. You get to make a decision about who 'you' procreate with, not decisions on behalf of anyone else, so it's a pointless discussion to begin with.

Edited by BlueJay (07 Jun 2022 10.19pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 07 Jun 22 10.35pm
Yawn. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

07 Jun 22 10.35pm

Yawn.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 07 Jun 22 10.48pm
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio is there a Brixton in Poland or Hungary ? just the 'tide of history'. Are you on drugs ? Next you will be telling me Hitler was misunderstood ? that's what you socialists like to believe. And incidentally, Hitler was a socialist (the clue was in the name of his Party of monsters)....and he was also deluded about 'tides of history'. Deliberate Population replacement is a War-crime, in case you forgot. Edited by PalazioVecchio (07 Jun 2022 5.02pm) Neither Poland nor Hungary are remotely like the UK. They have a very different history, culture and language to us. Comparisons are a meaningless distraction. Hitler was no socialist. To try to use the old chestnut of the Nazis using that term has been debunked so often even the most deluded ought to know it's nonsense. Hitler was a fascist, and as hard right in approach as it seems many here are. There is no "population replacement", let alone a deliberate one. That idea is just another conspiracy theory, which has been thoroughly debunked, as anyone with sufficient interest can find out. It's just a popular wind up for the gullible. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 07 Jun 22 10.48pm

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

is there a Brixton in Poland or Hungary ? just the 'tide of history'. Are you on drugs ?

Next you will be telling me Hitler was misunderstood ? that's what you socialists like to believe. And incidentally, Hitler was a socialist (the clue was in the name of his Party of monsters)....and he was also deluded about 'tides of history'.

Deliberate Population replacement is a War-crime, in case you forgot.

Edited by PalazioVecchio (07 Jun 2022 5.02pm)

Neither Poland nor Hungary are remotely like the UK. They have a very different history, culture and language to us. Comparisons are a meaningless distraction.

Hitler was no socialist. To try to use the old chestnut of the Nazis using that term has been debunked so often even the most deluded ought to know it's nonsense. Hitler was a fascist, and as hard right in approach as it seems many here are.

There is no "population replacement", let alone a deliberate one. That idea is just another conspiracy theory, which has been thoroughly debunked, as anyone with sufficient interest can find out. It's just a popular wind up for the gullible.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

W12 07 Jun 22 10.51pm
I think any argument about indigenous rights, replacement or racial bias is secondary to the most important point. Whatever your view on any of these subjects (which are secondary) the point people need to focus on and understand is that policy and law was in enacted under both labour but especially conservatives that was in direct opposition to the will of the voting British public. Of that there can be no doubt.
Alert a moderator to this post

W12 07 Jun 22 10.51pm

I think any argument about indigenous rights, replacement or racial bias is secondary to the most important point.

Whatever your view on any of these subjects (which are secondary) the point people need to focus on and understand is that policy and law was in enacted under both labour but especially conservatives that was in direct opposition to the will of the voting British public.

Of that there can be no doubt.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 07 Jun 22 10.54pm
Originally posted by georgenorman Look around the world and see that most conflicts have differences in race, religion and culture at their root. Where there is no actual violent conflict, there is a sullen, non-integrating mutual distrust. There is no reason to believe that it will be any different here. Edited by georgenorman (07 Jun 2022 6.22pm) In under-developed countries, that's true. Religion is the primary source of conflict. There is though every reason to believe it won't happen here, or in any other modern country like the UK. There is plenty of evidence already. Just look at how we have absorbed the inflows over the past 50 years. They present challenges, and cause the kind of resentment to be read here, but as the generations pass these lessen. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 07 Jun 22 10.54pm

Originally posted by georgenorman

Look around the world and see that most conflicts have differences in race, religion and culture at their root. Where there is no actual violent conflict, there is a sullen, non-integrating mutual distrust. There is no reason to believe that it will be any different here.

Edited by georgenorman (07 Jun 2022 6.22pm)

In under-developed countries, that's true. Religion is the primary source of conflict. There is though every reason to believe it won't happen here, or in any other modern country like the UK. There is plenty of evidence already. Just look at how we have absorbed the inflows over the past 50 years. They present challenges, and cause the kind of resentment to be read here, but as the generations pass these lessen.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 07 Jun 22 10.56pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays Or you can move to Cornwall. Or you to Hungary. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 07 Jun 22 10.56pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Or you can move to Cornwall.

Or you to Hungary.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 07 Jun 22 11.02pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Or you to Hungary. Me, moving to Hungary wouldn't involve me being a hypocrite to my principles. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

07 Jun 22 11.02pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Or you to Hungary.

Me, moving to Hungary wouldn't involve me being a hypocrite to my principles.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 07 Jun 22 11.13pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Technology is controlled by people, computers, boats and aeroplanes included. The populace is governed by small numbers of people, and those with most influence are those who have vast sums of money. As Stirling suggests, you are smart enough to know this, so your silly assertions are purely political game playing. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (07 Jun 2022 7.07pm) So you want that technology controlled by different people who think like you? Rather than allow the people to decide for themselves how to use it? The populace is not controlled by anyone! People with money have influence, but not control. So long as we can vote in free and fair elections, we have control. We just need to use it. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 07 Jun 22 11.13pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Technology is controlled by people, computers, boats and aeroplanes included.

The populace is governed by small numbers of people, and those with most influence are those who have vast sums of money.

As Stirling suggests, you are smart enough to know this, so your silly assertions are purely political game playing.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (07 Jun 2022 7.07pm)

So you want that technology controlled by different people who think like you?

Rather than allow the people to decide for themselves how to use it?

The populace is not controlled by anyone! People with money have influence, but not control. So long as we can vote in free and fair elections, we have control. We just need to use it.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 07 Jun 22 11.14pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle In under-developed countries, that's true. Religion is the primary source of conflict. There is though every reason to believe it won't happen here, or in any other modern country like the UK. There is plenty of evidence already. Just look at how we have absorbed the inflows over the past 50 years. They present challenges, and cause the kind of resentment to be read here, but as the generations pass these lessen. Try walking around Glasgow, Belfast or Savile Town wearing the wrong shirt.
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

07 Jun 22 11.14pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Try walking around Glasgow, Belfast or Savile Town wearing the wrong shirt.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 07 Jun 22 11.21pm
Originally posted by W12 I think any argument about indigenous rights, replacement or racial bias is secondary to the most important point. Whatever your view on any of these subjects (which are secondary) the point people need to focus on and understand is that policy and law was in enacted under both labour but especially conservatives that was in direct opposition to the will of the voting British public. Of that there can be no doubt. The only thing there's no doubt about is that you don't understand how our democracy works. It's not the job of an MP, the Parliament which they populate, or the Government that is formed by them, to do anything in response to the "will of the voting British public". Their job is to deliver what their collective wisdom perceives we need, and not what we want. Our job, starts and ends, when we choose who they are. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 07 Jun 22 11.21pm

Originally posted by W12

I think any argument about indigenous rights, replacement or racial bias is secondary to the most important point.

Of that there can be no doubt.

The only thing there's no doubt about is that you don't understand how our democracy works.

It's not the job of an MP, the Parliament which they populate, or the Government that is formed by them, to do anything in response to the "will of the voting British public".

Their job is to deliver what their collective wisdom perceives we need, and not what we want.

Our job, starts and ends, when we choose who they are.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 07 Jun 22 11.24pm
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle Try walking around Glasgow, Belfast or Savile Town wearing the wrong shirt. It might be unkind to suggest that Scotland, Northern Ireland and Yorkshire are under-developed countries (or counties), but I take your point. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 07 Jun 22 11.24pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Try walking around Glasgow, Belfast or Savile Town wearing the wrong shirt.

It might be unkind to suggest that Scotland, Northern Ireland and Yorkshire are under-developed countries (or counties), but I take your point.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 4 of 39 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

The Great Reset

Site Map

Sponsors