You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > On the attack or Defensive stance
March 28 2024 1.51pm

On the attack or Defensive stance

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

 

waddy Flag Highton,Melbourne 04 Sep 22 10.52pm

So Man Utd at Selhurst- very different team from last game of last season coming to Sarf London

So does Patrick want to do the same tactics he chose against Liverpool or does he
Choose to go at them ? Shock & Awe ?

I’d like to see us take them full on - what would you do against a Utd whom are now buzzing with confidence?

 


Forever Palace Proud

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View thai-eagle's Profile thai-eagle Flag chiang mai 05 Sep 22 2.20am Send a Private Message to thai-eagle Add thai-eagle as a friend

Go for it! Start with Olise and Wilf on top, drop Schlupp!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View YT's Profile YT Flag Oxford 05 Sep 22 8.00am Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Attack!
Attack!
Attack, attack attack!!

is what I say.

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Eaglecoops's Profile Eaglecoops Flag CR3 05 Sep 22 8.00am Send a Private Message to Eaglecoops Add Eaglecoops as a friend

Go for it. I won’t be popular for saying it but I would drop Eze and play a midfield three of Schlupp, Doucoure and Ayew which will allow Olise to play up top with Mateta and Zaha.

If you want to shoehorn Eze into this side then I would consider playing Zaha at CF. Hughes could also come in for Schlupp.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PatrickA's Profile PatrickA Flag London 05 Sep 22 8.21am Send a Private Message to PatrickA Add PatrickA as a friend

If my memory serves me correctly Vieira hasn’t really used 5 at the back in home games.
United still look like a collection of individuals rather than a coordinated team at this stage and Arsenal dominated the game yesterday. United caught them on the break.
I would be inclined to go the offensive targeting their back four which has not settled down yet containing two new players.
Erickson still looks a good player controlling the tempo of the game with an extensive passing range.
The trend these days, however, is not to mark man to man.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Nicholas91's Profile Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 05 Sep 22 8.31am Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

In all honesty I would rather we stick to the style we have cultured, having plans up our sleeve and utilising both when best appropriate and effectively.

I understand PV wanting us to be adaptable but it seems very negative and indescribably disastrous for us to be taking leads then dropping points like their hot as some sort of shambolic, complete antithesis game plan is installed mid-game. I get the thinking behind it but it hasn't worked. Stick to what we do best and tweak it, don't try and transform immediately mid-game only to constantly throw away leads.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lanzo-Ad's Profile Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 05 Sep 22 8.35am Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

Go for it. I won’t be popular for saying it but I would drop Eze and play a midfield three of Schlupp, Doucoure and Ayew which will allow Olise to play up top with Mateta and Zaha.

If you want to shoehorn Eze into this side then I would consider playing Zaha at CF. Hughes could also come in for Schlupp.

Whhaaatttt

 


“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View southnorwoodhill's Profile southnorwoodhill Flag 05 Sep 22 8.41am Send a Private Message to southnorwoodhill Add southnorwoodhill as a friend

10 behind the ball and Ayew on his lonesome up front chasing down everything. It's a tactic.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Nicholas91's Profile Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 05 Sep 22 8.41am Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

Go for it. I won’t be popular for saying it but I would drop Eze and play a midfield three of Schlupp, Doucoure and Ayew which will allow Olise to play up top with Mateta and Zaha.

If you want to shoehorn Eze into this side then I would consider playing Zaha at CF. Hughes could also come in for Schlupp.

I maintain this is my subjective opinion on our best starting XI as things stand.

GK: Guaita

LB: Mitchell
CB: Andersen
CB: Guehi
RB: Clyne (I think Ward is looking much better of late though)

CM: Doucoure
CM: Hughes
CAM: Eze

LW: Zaha
CF: Mateta
RW: Olise


I'd like to see a fit and firing JMac in the midfield for Hughes, Schlupp utilised as an impact player or when necessary and I'd like to see more of Ebiowei. Rest of the squad used as and when necessary of course.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lanzo-Ad's Profile Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 05 Sep 22 8.49am Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

**************Guaita************
*******Ward**Andersen**Guehi****
Clyne**Doucore***Hughes**Schlupp
**************Eze***************
******Olise**********Wilf*******

This in my opinion is the best line up and formation that we have, i dont like three at the back, but i dont think we have a CF that is good enough to play 4-3-3

 


“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View southnorwoodhill's Profile southnorwoodhill Flag 05 Sep 22 9.04am Send a Private Message to southnorwoodhill Add southnorwoodhill as a friend

Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad

**************Guaita************
*******Ward**Andersen**Guehi****
Clyne**Doucore***Hughes**Schlupp
**************Eze***************
******Olise**********Wilf*******

This in my opinion is the best line up and formation that we have, i dont like three at the back, but i dont think we have a CF that is good enough to play 4-3-3

Would this rely upon Andersen hitting long balls for Zaha and Olise the chase in behind? Can't see either playing with their backs to goal. And Eze will be isolated, drifting around more so than he usually does.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lanzo-Ad's Profile Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 05 Sep 22 10.32am Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

Originally posted by southnorwoodhill

Would this rely upon Andersen hitting long balls for Zaha and Olise the chase in behind? Can't see either playing with their backs to goal. And Eze will be isolated, drifting around more so than he usually does.

No, it will be passing through a 5-man midfield and getting Eze receiving the ball in the last third to create, with the occasional Crossfield ball by Andersen to the wings

 


“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > On the attack or Defensive stance