Is both delicious and worrying when the backtracking on a decision, an increasingly frequent happening, does prove such decisions are made from ideological devotion as opposed to cerebral exercise. Is the duty of those able to think to corral and reduce the harm caused by those who cannot.

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

As is quite usual if you read why the lady won her case you will understand that it had nothing at all to do with whether the council was right, or wrong, to cancel the event.

It was only “procedurally unlawful”. In other words there was a processing error.

Big deal! Don’t let that stop anyone drawing all sorts of other conclusions though.

This wasn’t a victory for anyone! It was a piece of luck. Like a motorist avoiding a speeding fine because the police failed to calibrate their cameras on time.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

It’s the need to pay twice for an identical document that bugs me. Why create additional administration and clog up the system when sight of the other, which remains current, ought to be sufficient?

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

But the fact is they were cancelling it due to her views on transgender, free speech eh!
What other conclusions can be drawn? Read the bit about University of York, there is a cancel culture which cannot be denied

Sorry duplicate post, nearly! I have added, “which they admitted”

Edited by Spiderman (08 Oct 2022 2.43pm)

When they are, it is.

When.they aren’t, it isn’t.

Transgender women, behaving discretely in private cubicles aren’t.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.