That documentary
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 CrazyBadger  Ware 06 Dec 22 8.50am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Discredit it before it's aired, sounds a very Media thing to do... and you expected what - a reasoned critique and admission of fault?
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Spiderman Horsham 06 Dec 22 8.55am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I won't be watching either. Firstly because it's of no interest and secondly because it's on Netflix and I won't pay for such things. However, condemning it before it's been aired seems unreasonable. That who-ever is doing the publicity has used a stock photo to illustrate a point they made has nothing to do with the Sussexes themselves. It's typical though of the Mail not to point this out. It was not used as a stock photo, it was misleading the viewers by making out these 2 were involved. Total lie, which is not surprising given the amount of untruths they spewed to Oprah, but don’t let your dislike of the Mail cloud your judgement.
Edited by Spiderman (06 Dec 2022 9.02am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  06 Dec 22 9.05am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
It was not used as a stock photo, it was misleading the viewers by making out these 2 were involved. Total lie, which is not surprising given the amount of untruths they spewed to Oprah, but don’t let your dislike of the Mail cloud your judgement. Edited by Spiderman (06 Dec 2022 8.57am) Not the only one. Seems there is also footage of photographers surrounding Trump's attorney and one of Katie Price's court appearances as well as one they had officially approved which are all offered up as examples of the nightmare they've had to endure.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
eagleman13  On The Road To Hell & Alicante 06 Dec 22 9.10am |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
It was not used as a stock photo, it was misleading the viewers by making out these 2 were involved. Total lie, which is not surprising given the amount of untruths they spewed to Oprah, but don’t let your dislike of the Mail cloud your judgement.
Edited by Spiderman (06 Dec 2022 9.02am) WE has a mate who is a 'very senior sub-editor' for the Mail, he said so himself @ 11.32pm last night on the BBC thread, so this is where he gets his informed info from.
I'm a blind man, i'm a blind man, now my room is cold, |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Nicholas91  The Democratic Republic of Kent 06 Dec 22 10.26am |
|
|---|---|
|
To be quite honest, I couldn't give a flying f**k about either of them and see this as a self-indulgent, narcissistic exercise in massaging egos, self-promotion and void filling in lieu of not having any real purpose in life. That Meghan seems quite sinister in her motives but I of course have no idea what she's up to and I am not sure what anybody else's expectations are from a grown bloke that's never had a job? The only people I really loathe more than the ones featured in this b0llocks are those that are intent on watching, formulating opinions around and discussing it as though it is of any importance to society. The odd chat privately or on HoL is different however
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Wisbech Eagle Online Truro Cornwall 06 Dec 22 11.41am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
It was not used as a stock photo, it was misleading the viewers by making out these 2 were involved. Total lie, which is not surprising given the amount of untruths they spewed to Oprah, but don’t let your dislike of the Mail cloud your judgement.
Edited by Spiderman (06 Dec 2022 9.02am) The point is that it was the editorial team making the documentary who were responsible for that, and not the subject or the producers. The Mail accusing the Sussexes of something I doubt they were even aware of is what is par for their standards.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Online Truro Cornwall 06 Dec 22 11.43am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by eagleman13
WE has a mate who is a 'very senior sub-editor' for the Mail, he said so himself @ 11.32pm last night on the BBC thread, so this is where he gets his informed info from. Was, not is. He retired some years ago. He has given me a few insights though!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
HKOwen  Hong Kong 06 Dec 22 12.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
A sub editor is a glorified spell checker, their job is to edit other people's work.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 06 Dec 22 12.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Not the only one. Seems there is also footage of photographers surrounding Trump's attorney and one of Katie Price's court appearances as well as one they had officially approved which are all offered up as examples of the nightmare they've had to endure. They'd literally pay people to have that much attention. Well one of them would anyway. The other one's a moron.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cryrst Online  The garden of England 06 Dec 22 7.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Only if it deserves it. I am not condemning it. I am not interested in it. So when some on here watch it and slag it off you won’t defend harry and the trout as from your seat you won’t have an opinion. Just so we know what you mean!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| mezzer Main Stand, Block F, Row 20 seat 1... 08 Dec 22 9.54am |
|
|---|---|
|
Thinking of starting a sweepstake on how long it will take for the documentary "Meghan - My Story. The truth behind my relationship with Harry" about how the former Prince could not shake off the ingrained prejudices of having been a member of the British Royal Family. I'll start the bidding at 5 years.
Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 08 Dec 22 10.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by mezzer
Thinking of starting a sweepstake on how long it will take for the documentary "Meghan - My Story. The truth behind my relationship with Harry" about how the former Prince could not shake off the ingrained prejudices of having been a member of the British Royal Family. I'll start the bidding at 5 years. Will this include Harry asking her opinion on travelling by rail leading to a mental breakdown? Rail = Underground Railroad = Reference to slavery = OH MY GOD!!!! RACISM and RACIST ABUSE!! THE GREATEST TRAGEDY TO EVER BEFALL SOMEONE SO PRIVILEGED!!! THE WHOLE WORLD MUST KNOW!!! Oh and, you know, Meghan gets plenty of attention, perhaps some sort of social veneration, maybe a few murals that kind of thing. And of course money, LOADS O' MONEY!!!
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.