We have been asked, quite reasonably, to take these comments elsewhere, but I cannot allow that to stand, especially as Yaxley-Lennon can be viewed as evidence of why it's wrong, seeing as he is doing his best to make Britain a worse place.

You don't embrace an ugly pig, although comparing Brexit to an ugly pig isn't being fair to the pig, who can't help being either a pig or ugly.

You hold your nose and do the best you can. That involves both living with the consequences and working hard to reverse it.

The Brexit battle is indeed lost, and I am over that, but the battle of ideas is far from over. In many ways Brexit was just the wake-up call. A charge by the out of date whilst the next generation were immobilised. The future of our country doesn't depend on the likes of you, but on the young and they, collectively, see us, modern Britain, at the centre of Europe and not as the shadow of a long departed imperial power.

When his current pseudonym is half the title of the thread it's hardly a "distraction" is it? It is the real story.

If you want a thread which concentrates solely on the activities of the grooming gangs I'm sure you can create one. This one is about Yaxley-Lennon's role in the whole sorry story.

To attempt to ignore that is what is disingenuous.

I did, and I asked why he was there, and why was he making a video?

He has no connection to the area, or to any of the people involved. He isn't a policeman. He isn't a real journalist. That's just cover for interfering in things that he is fixated about.

He inserted himself into a situation with the intention of causing trouble, found out that things weren't quite as he expected, and then tried to whitewash the reasons for going there in the first place.

I did, and I asked why he was there, and why was he making a video?

He has no connection to the area, or to any of the people involved. He isn't a policeman. He isn't a real journalist. That's just cover for interfering in things that he is fixated about.

He inserted himself into a situation with the intention of causing trouble, found out that things weren't quite as he expected, and then tried to whitewash the reasons for going there in the first place.

well to follow your logic....... then maybe yourself should also not be commenting on a Rape that is not involving people immediately connected with yourself ?

or maybe any other crimes beyond your particular neighbourhood in Truro ?

and heaven forbid if Yaxley-Lennon gave an opinion on another country, say ? another rape gang in Sweden.

Edited by PalazioVecchio (18 Mar 2023 1.49pm)

Watch it again and listen. He actually did investigative work prior to going. Realised this tart was a compulsive liar so followed it on. He had evidence and do you honestly believe the plod or any one in authority would have entertained him. No because people like you don’t like to be wrong or give second chances. He rocked the boat by proving the rape gangs yet you still see nothing wrong with the rapists. How about lydon with saville. Should he have kept quiet as he got laughed at as well.