Rafiq
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Midlands Eagle  02 Apr 23 6.43am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Notice how they still use the weasel words "on balance of probabilities" - still trying to continue the smearing of his reputation. It is a legal term. In the High Court one has to be proven "without a shadow of a doubt" but in the County Court proof only has to be in the "balance of probabilities"
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
 georgenorman 02 Apr 23 7.18am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
It is a legal term. In the High Court one has to be proven "without a shadow of a doubt" but in the County Court proof only has to be in the "balance of probabilities" What does it mean in Kangaroo Courts?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Forest Hillbilly  in a hidey-hole 02 Apr 23 7.59am |
|
|---|---|
|
this result can only mean Power to the People. But let Rafiq tell it how he sees it, . . . Edited by Forest Hillbilly (02 Apr 2023 8.00am)
"The facts have changed", Rishi Sunak |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Attachment: | silvertop Portishead 02 Apr 23 11.32am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
It is a legal term. In the High Court one has to be proven "without a shadow of a doubt" but in the County Court proof only has to be in the "balance of probabilities" That's not right. Criminal matters require proof beyond reasonable doubt (80% true). Civil matters are proven on a balance of probability ie more right than wrong (+ 50%).
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 02 Apr 23 11.34am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
this result can only mean Power to the People. But let Rafiq tell it how he sees it, . . . Edited by Forest Hillbilly (02 Apr 2023 8.00am) I guess it's a bit like the n word. They can use it but we can't. My missus, who's Dutch Irish, said 'Pommie Shower' the other day, I should have called for a full enquiry.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| crystal-purley Purley 02 Apr 23 12.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Back on topic, so often derailed by the same old bore Well worth a watch whether you're a fan of cricket or not. Essential if you're a fan of intellect and the beauty (in the right hands, certain posters take note) of the english language. Post-Rafiq, so that is referenced. 5.00 > 49:00 for Fry.
Enjoying getting up later and not having someone who knows better than me (apart from the missus of course). |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 02 Apr 23 1.12pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by crystal-purley
If Fry uses some fancy language it must be true. He's so thick-skinned and completely an expert on playing cricket at a high level. He literally knows all about it.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
HKOwen  Hong Kong 04 Apr 23 7.58am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
That's not right. Criminal matters require proof beyond reasonable doubt (80% true). Civil matters are proven on a balance of probability ie more right than wrong (+ 50%). These numbers you quote are from googling and are US based
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.