You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Long-live the King
April 24 2024 2.56pm

Long-live the King

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 18 of 20 < 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >

 

View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 10 May 23 9.02am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

He was invited.

And he could have said no thanks if I am not going to be allowed to sit at the big table with the adults.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 12 May 23 7.02pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by sydtheeagle

Surely to be invited and then more or less publicly diminished is the opposite of what should have happened? The whole thing struck me as another example of the pettiness and dysfunctionality of the Royal family. "We'll invite you because that's what one's expected to do, but you can swing in the wind once you're here". Like I said, I don't care but for me, not a good look. With a family like that, it's not hard to understand Harry's pysche.

Edited by sydtheeagle (10 May 2023 9.00am)

Charles now saying he didn't want to invite him! Blimey.

You certainly have a point, his own son.

I could see Harry as a King actually, he has a Henry VIII look about him.

King Charles is hardly going to win any battles, and as for Camilla, she may tell you how to re-cycle your tea-bags.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Behind Enemy Lines's Profile Behind Enemy Lines Flag Sussex 12 May 23 7.33pm Send a Private Message to Behind Enemy Lines Add Behind Enemy Lines as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

And he could have said no thanks if I am not going to be allowed to sit at the big table with the adults.

I thought he didn’t want to stay so as to get back for his child’s birthday. But there again, last year he apparently missed the birthday to attend a polo match, so who knows what the real reason is. But I’m sure Harry can get another book out of his half a day’s attendance at the Coronation…

 


hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 12 May 23 7.56pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20


I could see Harry as a King actually, he has a Henry VIII look about him.

what ? like, Psychopath ?

 


Eze Peasy at Anfield....

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 12 May 23 9.04pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

what ? like, Psychopath ?

Probably.

But at least you win battles and have the odd wife or two, or six.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lombardinho's Profile Lombardinho Flag London 08 Mar 24 12.49pm Send a Private Message to Lombardinho Add Lombardinho as a friend

According to this guy His Madge has quietly abdicated.
Even if only half of what he's saying is true, there's gonna be some changes around here!

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Mar 24 1.05pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Lombardinho

According to this guy His Madge has quietly abdicated.
Even if only half of what he's saying is true, there's gonna be some changes around here!

[Link]

There are literally tens of times the royal family was changed - if they didn't they would truly trace their heritage back to Alfred, which is clearly rubbish. Cnut was king FFS. He was a Viking. The Tudors had no actual royal blood and take one look into the Norman kings and the Plantagenets. Later on William of Orange and George III were nowhere near in line to the throne. If Charles goes then it will be likely William - which I believe would be a positive thing. However, having looked into Charles a bit over the years, the only way he'll abdicate is if he's dying, and frankly I wouldn't even expect it then. He's always wanted it.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 08 Mar 24 1.06pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

I managed to watch 2 minutes and 40 seconds.

Complete anti royalist claptrap. You know I like a conspiracy, but the fact that he is an Australian should be all you need to know.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Mar 24 1.09pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

I managed to watch 2 minutes and 40 seconds.

Complete anti royalist claptrap. You know I like a conspiracy, but the fact that he is an Australian should be all you need to know.

Pommie b******

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 08 Mar 24 1.09pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

There are literally tens of times the royal family was changed - if they didn't they would truly trace their heritage back to Alfred, which is clearly rubbish. Cnut was king FFS. He was a Viking. The Tudors had no actual royal blood and take one look into the Norman kings and the Plantagenets. Later on William of Orange and George III were nowhere near in line to the throne. If Charles goes then it will be likely William - which I believe would be a positive thing. However, having looked into Charles a bit over the years, the only way he'll abdicate is if he's dying, and frankly I wouldn't even expect it then. He's always wanted it.

It's fairly common knowledge that royal ancestry doesn't join up all the way back to William the First or who ever you feel like choosing.
Even Victoria has a flimsy claim to the throne.

Of course Royalty is silly, but it's better than President Sunak or Sheik someone or other.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Mar 24 1.15pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

It's fairly common knowledge that royal ancestry doesn't join up all the way back to William the First or who ever you feel like choosing.
Even Victoria has a flimsy claim to the throne.

Of course Royalty is silly, but it's better than President Sunak or Sheik someone or other.

I have no issue with it. I was countering this 1603 and 1567 rubbish - I've heard it all before. I'm a Tudor historian. I always hear that crap and wanted to point out how meaningless it is. A Sheik sounds alright though - we can all be rich and drive around in luxury cars. Not drinking though - won't work for me.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lombardinho's Profile Lombardinho Flag London 08 Mar 24 1.20pm Send a Private Message to Lombardinho Add Lombardinho as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

I managed to watch 2 minutes and 40 seconds.

Complete anti royalist claptrap. You know I like a conspiracy, but the fact that he is an Australian should be all you need to know.

Kiwi actually.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 18 of 20 < 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Long-live the King