You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > our wonderful progressive society
June 8 2024 10.47pm

our wonderful progressive society

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 6 of 21 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

 

View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 10 Oct 17 11.15am Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Michaelawt85

See this is the thing. There's a very true saying in life. What you don't have you don't miss. Your girls had their mum , you all remember her . You are also a male raising two girls. Much the same for a woman raising boys who have had their father present.

My case as you know is I have never met or known the identity of my father. Growing up I didn't bat an eyelid. To me I had a mum. Didn't give any thought to my father. As I say what you don't have you don't miss. It's bothered me immensely as I grew older and learnt the details behind my entry into the world. But as a kid. Nope. Made no difference to me at all. However I realise this may be because I am a female and it's a male figure. I wonder therefore what difference or impact it has if it's the opposite gender to the child who is absent for whatever reason.

Sorry to hear how much it has bothered you more recently Michaela. If it's any consolation I have seen many people royally messed up by poor fathering. Having a father in your life may not have been better. Good job you have the HOL family to give lots of fatherly advice.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Online Flag 10 Oct 17 11.22am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

Sorry to hear how much it has bothered you more recently Michaela. If it's any consolation I have seen many people royally messed up by poor fathering. Having a father in your life may not have been better. Good job you have the HOL family to give lots of fatherly advice.

?

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 10 Oct 17 11.23am

Someone call Batman, I think the riddler is lurking.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View dannyh's Profile dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 10 Oct 17 11.28am Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Originally posted by Michaelawt85

See this is the thing. There's a very true saying in life. What you don't have you don't miss. Your girls had their mum , you all remember her . You are also a male raising two girls. Much the same for a woman raising boys who have had their father present.

My case as you know is I have never met or known the identity of my father. Growing up I didn't bat an eyelid. To me I had a mum. Didn't give any thought to my father. As I say what you don't have you don't miss. It's bothered me immensely as I grew older and learnt the details behind my entry into the world. But as a kid. Nope. Made no difference to me at all. However I realise this may be because I am a female and it's a male figure. I wonder therefore what difference or impact it has if it's the opposite gender to the child who is absent for whatever reason.

And therein lies the absolute crux of my argument. As so called enlightened humans we have decided that same sex couples with kids is a blinding idea. Without any study into the future psychological effects of those children placed in their care. Don't think for one minute I am demonising same sex parents. I just think in our rush to be "inclusive" we have rather missed who this affects most.

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Online Flag 10 Oct 17 11.28am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Michaelawt85

See this is the thing. There's a very true saying in life. What you don't have you don't miss. Your girls had their mum , you all remember her . You are also a male raising two girls. Much the same for a woman raising boys who have had their father present.

My case as you know is I have never met or known the identity of my father. Growing up I didn't bat an eyelid. To me I had a mum. Didn't give any thought to my father. As I say what you don't have you don't miss. It's bothered me immensely as I grew older and learnt the details behind my entry into the world. But as a kid. Nope. Made no difference to me at all. However I realise this may be because I am a female and it's a male figure. I wonder therefore what difference or impact it has if it's the opposite gender to the child who is absent for whatever reason.

It does have an impact and as you mature in life the more you realise it.

Some people get easier upbringings than others....Even with crap starts we won the lottery just by being born here. You build your own coping mechanisms as you go through life. There are no solutions.

This little child was given to its murderer and it was genuinely failed and a price needs to be enacted.

Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Oct 2017 11.29am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 10 Oct 17 11.35am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Michaelawt85

See this is the thing. There's a very true saying in life. What you don't have you don't miss. Your girls had their mum , you all remember her . You are also a male raising two girls. Much the same for a woman raising boys who have had their father present.

My case as you know is I have never met or known the identity of my father. Growing up I didn't bat an eyelid. To me I had a mum. Didn't give any thought to my father. As I say what you don't have you don't miss. It's bothered me immensely as I grew older and learnt the details behind my entry into the world. But as a kid. Nope. Made no difference to me at all. However I realise this may be because I am a female and it's a male figure. I wonder therefore what difference or impact it has if it's the opposite gender to the child who is absent for whatever reason.

I think there is a difference between what a child worries about or not and the psychological effect circumstances have.
The effect of not having a 'regular' upbringing might not be apparent to the individual or appear until later life.
I was raised by my grandparents and had no contact with my mother at all past infancy. My father was a weekly visitor. I chose to remain with my grandparents even after my dad remarried. I was happy there as far as I was concerned. I have no doubt that my circumstances have had an effect on my personality over the years and that I have only become more self aware about them as I have got older.
The world is full of kids from broken homes and difficult backgrounds and there is often just a least worst option for them from necessity. I don't think that should be an excuse to promote progressive ideas above the best interests of the child because aside from putting the child first, we don't know what kind of society that will create.


Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (10 Oct 2017 11.38am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 10 Oct 17 11.42am Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by dannyh

Where the fCuk did I say that ??? I said same sex parents as an alternative to a life with sh1thouse parents are obviously a better option.. Jesus.

erm, in the bit I highlighted perhaps.

''with even s***tier parents then same sex couples''

Edited by Mapletree (10 Oct 2017 11.47am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 10 Oct 17 11.48am

Originally posted by dannyh

And therein lies the absolute crux of my argument. As so called enlightened humans we have decided that same sex couples with kids is a blinding idea. Without any study into the future psychological effects of those children placed in their care. Don't think for one minute I am demonising same sex parents. I just think in our rush to be "inclusive" we have rather missed who this affects most.

There is quite a bit of research of kids who've grown up with gay parents though. Its an area of sociology and psychological research that's been going on for decades. Interestingly, the child of a gay parent are no more likely to be gay, than those of straight parents - but they are more likely to find it easier to come to terms with being gay, and to have less social issues around gay people.

Problem isn't really the impact of kids being placed with gay parents, one would expect some issues - the question is whether this is worse than the impact in general of growing up in foster care and the care system (or in 'at risk environments').

When I worked for the Courts, we dealt with Child Protection Orders and cases of abuse, neglect and risk - Sexual orientation of parents isn't the kind of problem that kids in care are going to be damaged by, compared to the prolonged risks inherent in the care system.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View dannyh's Profile dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 10 Oct 17 11.49am Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

erm, in the bit I highlighted perhaps.

''with even s***tier parents then same sex couples''

Edited by Mapletree (10 Oct 2017 11.47am)

Can you read ?

I do agree yes, but only to a point. I suppose what I'm saying is that as an alternative to a s***ty life, with even s***tier parents then same sex couples who offer the child a better environment are obviously better for that child.

I said quite clearly same sex parents were a better option than the kid being with s***ty parents. Talk about read what you want to see.

It says THEN not than FFS.

Edited by dannyh (10 Oct 2017 11.51am)

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 10 Oct 17 11.49am

Originally posted by Mapletree

erm, in the bit I highlighted perhaps.

''with even s***tier parents then same sex couples''

Edited by Mapletree (10 Oct 2017 11.47am)

Maple, that wasn't the whole sentence.

He said that same sex parents in a caring environment is better than with s***ty parents.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 10 Oct 17 11.52am Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

There is quite a bit of research of kids who've grown up with gay parents though. Its an area of sociology and psychological research that's been going on for decades. Interestingly, the child of a gay parent are no more likely to be gay, than those of straight parents - but they are more likely to find it easier to come to terms with being gay, and to have less social issues around gay people.

Problem isn't really the impact of kids being placed with gay parents, one would expect some issues - the question is whether this is worse than the impact in general of growing up in foster care and the care system (or in 'at risk environments').

When I worked for the Courts, we dealt with Child Protection Orders and cases of abuse, neglect and risk - Sexual orientation of parents isn't the kind of problem that kids in care are going to be damaged by, compared to the prolonged risks inherent in the care system.

I think there is consensus on here that a same sex couple is a decent option for someone otherwise in care.

The argument seems to be more that a same sex couple bringing a child into the world, e.g. the old turkey baster routine, is unfair on the child and to be discouraged.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View dannyh's Profile dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 10 Oct 17 11.56am Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

There is quite a bit of research of kids who've grown up with gay parents though. Its an area of sociology and psychological research that's been going on for decades. Interestingly, the child of a gay parent are no more likely to be gay, than those of straight parents - but they are more likely to find it easier to come to terms with being gay, and to have less social issues around gay people.

Problem isn't really the impact of kids being placed with gay parents, one would expect some issues - the question is whether this is worse than the impact in general of growing up in foster care and the care system (or in 'at risk environments').

When I worked for the Courts, we dealt with Child Protection Orders and cases of abuse, neglect and risk - Sexual orientation of parents isn't the kind of problem that kids in care are going to be damaged by, compared to the prolonged risks inherent in the care system.

Your twisting the line of the argument Mr Martin. My point (which some are clearly refusing to acknowledge) is :

A normal loving mother and father, trump a gay or same sex (or whatever they feel like being today) set of parents.

Because by definition it is normal. Even our resident Wolfie Smith (NG) admitted that.

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 6 of 21 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > our wonderful progressive society