You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > US politics
June 3 2024 3.56am

US politics

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 530 of 637 < 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 >

 

View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 25 Jan 24 8.06am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Gee, thanks.

I'll stick with the dictionary.


Like this one?

[Link]

Seems pretty close to mine doesn’t it?

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 25 Jan 24 8.11am Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle


Like this one?

[Link]

Seems pretty close to mine doesn’t it?

Not really. Where does it say anything about a deterrent which isn't used doesn't deter?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 25 Jan 24 8.12am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by HKOwen

I agree with you. The problem is you are ok with people having choice whereas the poster you replied to believes if you don't agree with him you are defective.

Untrue.

People can hold whatever opinion they like. Even you. And me!

Mine is that some opinions are misinformed. As proved by you categorising them as defective.

Trust I have cleared that up for you, although I somehow doubt it.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 25 Jan 24 8.15am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Not really. Where does it say anything about a deterrent which isn't used doesn't deter?

Read my post at 9.53 on yesterday.

Anything else I have said is about context, not definition.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 25 Jan 24 8.21am Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Read my post at 9.53 on yesterday.

Anything else I have said is about context, not definition.

Read yours at 8.07 yesterday.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 25 Jan 24 9.01am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend


In early 1991, Soviet citizens voted on the New Union Treaty which proposed to reform-rather than dissolve-the USSR. 76% of Soviet voters ultimately supported maintaining the federal system of the Soviet Union, including a majority in nine of the 15 republics. A year later, however, the USSR didn’t exist.

In 2021, an astonishing 66% of Southern Republicans and 50% of independents were in favor of secession. The West Coast also showed strong support for secession but of a different political flavor, this time being mostly supported by Democrats.

In this sense, the U.S. is already in more of a precarious situation than the USSR was in early 1991

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View eaglesdare's Profile eaglesdare Flag 25 Jan 24 10.23am Send a Private Message to eaglesdare Add eaglesdare as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Untrue.

People can hold whatever opinion they like. Even you. And me!

Mine is that some opinions are misinformed. As proved by you categorising them as defective.

Trust I have cleared that up for you, although I somehow doubt it.

So if somone has an opinion you dont like or agree with...its misinformed...

Two people can see the same evidence, material and information and come up with two different opinions and that is okay.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Houston Eagle's Profile Houston Eagle Flag Houston 25 Jan 24 2.40pm Send a Private Message to Houston Eagle Add Houston Eagle as a friend

Opinions are just that a different perspective of 2 people seeing the same thing differently which is fairly normal in everyday life!

Now what I personally find very unnerving is when facts (generally a yes/no type answers) get moved into the grey area!! Many political examples include: classified documents, laptops, sexual relationship, email deletion etc!

People in positions of power just lie, lie and lie again and that is seen as acceptable! Very difficult to parent the next generation and beyond!

All the above enabled by money and influenced by the media!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 25 Jan 24 10.30pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Not really. Where does it say anything about a deterrent which isn't used doesn't deter?

It doesn’t. Deterrents which don’t deter cannot truly be called deterrents can they?

You understand this perfectly well and are just being pedantic.

The practicality is that if people are not convinced that something could be used then it won’t deter. Nuclear arsenals deter not because they aren’t regularly used but when they were the results were catastrophic. They were used. Just enough to deter. Walls don’t deter on their own. If machine gunners are going to kill you if you try to climb over then they will. Otherwise people will try to find ways to get over, under or around them.

This is a very silly, pointless conversation.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 25 Jan 24 10.33pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by eaglesdare

So if somone has an opinion you dont like or agree with...its misinformed...

Two people can see the same evidence, material and information and come up with two different opinions and that is okay.

Untrue. There are many opinions that I might disagree with but can understand and respect. There are others based on misinformation. Two different things.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 25 Jan 24 10.36pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Houston Eagle

Opinions are just that a different perspective of 2 people seeing the same thing differently which is fairly normal in everyday life!

Now what I personally find very unnerving is when facts (generally a yes/no type answers) get moved into the grey area!! Many political examples include: classified documents, laptops, sexual relationship, email deletion etc!

People in positions of power just lie, lie and lie again and that is seen as acceptable! Very difficult to parent the next generation and beyond!

All the above enabled by money and influenced by the media!

Trump being the worst example in modern times with the serious idea that “alternative facts”:exist. Thus giving him the freedom to declare what’s true and what isn’t. That’s really scary.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 25 Jan 24 10.37pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

It doesn’t. Deterrents which don’t deter cannot truly be called deterrents can they?

You understand this perfectly well and are just being pedantic.

The practicality is that if people are not convinced that something could be used then it won’t deter. Nuclear arsenals deter not because they aren’t regularly used but when they were the results were catastrophic. They were used. Just enough to deter. Walls don’t deter on their own. If machine gunners are going to kill you if you try to climb over then they will. Otherwise people will try to find ways to get over, under or around them.

This is a very silly, pointless conversation.

Silly and pointless compared to trying to convince people on a Crystal Palace fansite that a presidential candidate in another country isn't a good choice? OK.
A deterrent which doesn't have to be used is surely the best option.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 530 of 637 < 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > US politics