You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Jeremy Clarkson
June 7 2024 4.51pm

Jeremy Clarkson

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 12 of 28 < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 >

 

Hoof Hearted 13 Mar 15 1.51pm

Quote Stuk at 13 Mar 2015 1.15pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 13 Mar 2015 9.54am

Quote Crystal_Clear at 12 Mar 2015 6.47pm

I didn't realise that all their contracts on Top Gear are up soon, and they were due to sign new 3 year contracts.

BBC are in a very difficult situation now.

If they sack Clarkson, then May and Hammond can walk as well very soon.

What are the odds that Sky are lining up a megabucks offer of a new show ? A show they could potentially sell around the world.

BBC follow rules and potentially lose millions. That could mean they can no longer finance other shows that they make.

Dilemma, eh ?


My theory is that JC has engineered this situation for his own end.

Fed up with BBC interference he can walk away and set up another show on Sky/ITV which would replace Top Gear's world dominance instantly.

Why would he need to? They're all free to walk away next month if they wanted to.

Clarkson was however the one who brought the incident to the attention of the BBC bosses, not the producer.


Hype?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 13 Mar 15 1.58pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote Hoof Hearted at 13 Mar 2015 1.51pm

Quote Stuk at 13 Mar 2015 1.15pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 13 Mar 2015 9.54am

Quote Crystal_Clear at 12 Mar 2015 6.47pm

I didn't realise that all their contracts on Top Gear are up soon, and they were due to sign new 3 year contracts.

BBC are in a very difficult situation now.

If they sack Clarkson, then May and Hammond can walk as well very soon.

What are the odds that Sky are lining up a megabucks offer of a new show ? A show they could potentially sell around the world.

BBC follow rules and potentially lose millions. That could mean they can no longer finance other shows that they make.

Dilemma, eh ?


My theory is that JC has engineered this situation for his own end.

Fed up with BBC interference he can walk away and set up another show on Sky/ITV which would replace Top Gear's world dominance instantly.

Why would he need to? They're all free to walk away next month if they wanted to.

Clarkson was however the one who brought the incident to the attention of the BBC bosses, not the producer.


Hype?


I can't see it. Those 3 collectively leaving the BBC to go elsewhere would cause more than enough hype in itself.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 13 Mar 15 2.02pm

Quote Stuk at 13 Mar 2015 1.58pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 13 Mar 2015 1.51pm

Quote Stuk at 13 Mar 2015 1.15pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 13 Mar 2015 9.54am

Quote Crystal_Clear at 12 Mar 2015 6.47pm

I didn't realise that all their contracts on Top Gear are up soon, and they were due to sign new 3 year contracts.

BBC are in a very difficult situation now.

If they sack Clarkson, then May and Hammond can walk as well very soon.

What are the odds that Sky are lining up a megabucks offer of a new show ? A show they could potentially sell around the world.

BBC follow rules and potentially lose millions. That could mean they can no longer finance other shows that they make.

Dilemma, eh ?


My theory is that JC has engineered this situation for his own end.

Fed up with BBC interference he can walk away and set up another show on Sky/ITV which would replace Top Gear's world dominance instantly.

Why would he need to? They're all free to walk away next month if they wanted to.

Clarkson was however the one who brought the incident to the attention of the BBC bosses, not the producer.


Hype?


I can't see it. Those 3 collectively leaving the BBC to go elsewhere would cause more than enough hype in itself.


But this way the BBC look foolish and Clarkson is a master of creating a situation to promote himself.....

We'll see what happens.... you could be right.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Southampton_Eagle's Profile Southampton_Eagle Flag At the after party 13 Mar 15 2.57pm Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle Add Southampton_Eagle as a friend

Quote DanH at 11 Mar 2015 3.36pm

Imagine actually giving a sh*t about this.


Is the correct answer.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View topcat's Profile topcat Flag Holmesdale / Surbiton 13 Mar 15 3.12pm Send a Private Message to topcat Add topcat as a friend

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 13 Mar 2015 2.57pm

Quote DanH at 11 Mar 2015 3.36pm

Imagine actually giving a sh*t about this.


Is the correct answer.


I think it's quite interesting. You have 1000's of his fans who signed a petition before they knew what he had done and if he is going to be sacked. Now it is thought to be known what he did it will be interesting to see what the BBC does. Sack him and lose a lot of money or stand by him and lose face. If he wasn't going to sign a new contract, perhaps it doesn't matter either way.

If it is true that he reported himself to the BBC, it makes it more interesting as we wonder why he would do so if the producer (presumably) wasn't going to make a complaint.

Good piece about him and Chelsea. [Link]

 


It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Southampton_Eagle's Profile Southampton_Eagle Flag At the after party 13 Mar 15 3.49pm Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle Add Southampton_Eagle as a friend

Quote topcat at 13 Mar 2015 3.12pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 13 Mar 2015 2.57pm

Quote DanH at 11 Mar 2015 3.36pm

Imagine actually giving a sh*t about this.


Is the correct answer.


I think it's quite interesting. You have 1000's of his fans who signed a petition before they knew what he had done and if he is going to be sacked. Now it is thought to be known what he did it will be interesting to see what the BBC does. Sack him and lose a lot of money or stand by him and lose face. If he wasn't going to sign a new contract, perhaps it doesn't matter either way.

If it is true that he reported himself to the BBC, it makes it more interesting as we wonder why he would do so if the producer (presumably) wasn't going to make a complaint.

Good piece about him and Chelsea. [Link]

It's nothing more than the ridiculous celebrity infatuation that is sweeping this country.

Bloke on TV acts like a tit & then the f*cking Prime Minister gets involved and is interviewed about it.

As I said, ridiculous.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 13 Mar 15 3.54pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 13 Mar 2015 3.49pm

Quote topcat at 13 Mar 2015 3.12pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 13 Mar 2015 2.57pm

Quote DanH at 11 Mar 2015 3.36pm

Imagine actually giving a sh*t about this.


Is the correct answer.


I think it's quite interesting. You have 1000's of his fans who signed a petition before they knew what he had done and if he is going to be sacked. Now it is thought to be known what he did it will be interesting to see what the BBC does. Sack him and lose a lot of money or stand by him and lose face. If he wasn't going to sign a new contract, perhaps it doesn't matter either way.

If it is true that he reported himself to the BBC, it makes it more interesting as we wonder why he would do so if the producer (presumably) wasn't going to make a complaint.

Good piece about him and Chelsea. [Link]

It's nothing more than the ridiculous celebrity infatuation that is sweeping this country.

Bloke on TV acts like a tit & then the f*cking Prime Minister gets involved and is interviewed about it.

As I said, ridiculous.


Yeah that's a recent phenomenon isn't it. I mean it's not like we've got a load of cases where celebrity infatuation led to molestation or anything.

Bloke happens to be both mate and constituent of PM, and bloke works for national broadcaster.

The level of interest is definitely just a by-product of z list celebs & reality TV, or the most watched programme in the world. I can't decide...

Edited by Stuk (13 Mar 2015 3.55pm)

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 13 Mar 15 5.02pm

Says something about our nation that more people have signed a save Jezza petition than a save the NHS one...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Kosowski's Profile Kosowski Flag Standing at the top of B Block 13 Mar 15 5.44pm Send a Private Message to Kosowski Add Kosowski as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 13 Mar 2015 5.02pm

Says something about our nation that more people have signed a save Jezza petition than a save the NHS one...

Nail. Hit. Head.

 


Block B comment of 2011/2012 Season:

"That's better Palace, better...but still fucking shit!"

----------------------------------------------------------------

Dann to Much, Much to Yong.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Southampton_Eagle's Profile Southampton_Eagle Flag At the after party 13 Mar 15 5.52pm Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle Add Southampton_Eagle as a friend

Quote Stuk at 13 Mar 2015 3.54pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 13 Mar 2015 3.49pm

Quote topcat at 13 Mar 2015 3.12pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 13 Mar 2015 2.57pm

Quote DanH at 11 Mar 2015 3.36pm

Imagine actually giving a sh*t about this.


Is the correct answer.


I think it's quite interesting. You have 1000's of his fans who signed a petition before they knew what he had done and if he is going to be sacked. Now it is thought to be known what he did it will be interesting to see what the BBC does. Sack him and lose a lot of money or stand by him and lose face. If he wasn't going to sign a new contract, perhaps it doesn't matter either way.

If it is true that he reported himself to the BBC, it makes it more interesting as we wonder why he would do so if the producer (presumably) wasn't going to make a complaint.

Good piece about him and Chelsea. [Link]

It's nothing more than the ridiculous celebrity infatuation that is sweeping this country.

Bloke on TV acts like a tit & then the f*cking Prime Minister gets involved and is interviewed about it.

As I said, ridiculous.


Yeah that's a recent phenomenon isn't it. I mean it's not like we've got a load of cases where celebrity infatuation led to molestation or anything.

Bloke happens to be both mate and constituent of PM, and bloke works for national broadcaster.

The level of interest is definitely just a by-product of z list celebs & reality TV, or the most watched programme in the world. I can't decide...

Edited by Stuk (13 Mar 2015 3.55pm)

I'd rather my PM dealt with issues that concern the nation, not some middle aged mate of his who slapped someone.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Midlands Eagle's Profile Midlands Eagle Flag 13 Mar 15 5.53pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Interesting photo on my daughter's Facebook page this morning.

Jeremy Clarkson.jpg Attachment: Jeremy Clarkson.jpg (56.69Kb)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Qwijibo's Profile Qwijibo Flag Bournemouth 13 Mar 15 8.05pm Send a Private Message to Qwijibo Add Qwijibo as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 10 Mar 2015 11.25pm

It's gone downhill from here...

[Link]


My God that's dull.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 12 of 28 < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Jeremy Clarkson