Mail make Murrey - Parrish link
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Oliver  Bodega Bay 26 Jan 18 8.48am |
  |
|---|---|
|
The real (burger) meat of the story doesn't concern Murray or Parish at all.
I have prepared one of my own time capsules. I have placed some rather large samples of dynamite, gunpowder and nitroglycerin. My time capsule is set to go off in the year 3000. It will show them what we are really like. |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Midlands Eagle 26 Jan 18 8.52am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Oliver
The real meat of the story doesn't concern Murray or Parish at all. No. The Mail are just s*** stirring for the sake of it otherwise they would mention that Murray and Parish are amongst 32 small investors in the company and neither are directors so have no influence over any aspects of how the company is run
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| radsyrendot From Coventry now in Leicester 26 Jan 18 9.57am |
|
|---|---|
|
DirtyBird chicken shack
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Bangell Oxford 26 Jan 18 10.42am |
|
|---|---|
|
Steve Parish, Glenn Murray, and Wayne Routledge open a chicken shop together - sounds like the set-up for a joke
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dorking 26 Jan 18 11.32am |
|
|---|---|
|
I presume dirtybird is just the chicken variation of Dirty Burger, which seems to be the trendy way of describing 'artisan' beefburger places. In other words, trendy burger places
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Harry Beever Newbury 26 Jan 18 12.26pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I think you are confusing assets with income. Agencies don’t need to hold much in the way of assets. The main one is probably goodwill but that may not be valued very high in such a fickle ‘industry’. Thanks. I’m aware Dave that agents don’t own footballers but if you have a player contracted to an agent I was wondering if that’s considered an “asset” for the company or can assets only be physical objects? Must be a challenge valuing goodwill in football like you say.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 26 Jan 18 1.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Harry Beever
Thanks. I’m aware Dave that agents don’t own footballers but if you have a player contracted to an agent I was wondering if that’s considered an “asset” for the company or can assets only be physical objects? Must be a challenge valuing goodwill in football like you say. I assume that I must be invisible as I've already said that the assets that you are referring to are cash and debtors and not footballers.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Aray South London 26 Jan 18 1.13pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Not gonna lie - I did have a second take on this. I thought the potential for a conflict of interest with Salthouse had a ring of truth. There is a potential conflict - Parish should have answered the question "But asked on Thursday if his shares in Dirtybird represented a conflict of interest when Salthouse has been involved in at least eight Crystal Palace transfers since 2015, Parish declined to comment."
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| palace99 New Mills 26 Jan 18 1.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I assume that I must be invisible as I've already said that the assets that you are referring to are cash and debtors and not footballers. Harry - assets don't have to be bricks and mortar, things such as intellectual property rights, and patents etc can be very valuable. However, for an agent if they earn x and it goes through their company and they take it all as a wage then the company has no asset. Goodwill is difficult to value - that would be say the brand coca cola, it's recognised all over the world etc. For a footballer that would be complex. For an agent with say 10 premier league footballers I believe the assets would be No 2 and 4 is very difficult to estimate and I guess most companies will be very conservative
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Harry Beever Newbury 26 Jan 18 1.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Aray
Not gonna lie - I did have a second take on this. I thought the potential for a conflict of interest with Salthouse had a ring of truth. There is a potential conflict - Parish should have answered the question "But asked on Thursday if his shares in Dirtybird represented a conflict of interest when Salthouse has been involved in at least eight Crystal Palace transfers since 2015, Parish declined to comment." Parish tweeted that he hadn’t been asked for a comment so possible that that’s artistic license on their part. Sorry Midlands Eagle. Not invisible. Surprised given agents fees and the scale of transfers they only have £3.7 million if the company is as large as the Mail infers . Maybe the surplus is invested in chickens? No doubt the financial arrangements of many agents and others in football are some what convoluted.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Harry Beever Newbury 26 Jan 18 1.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by palace99
Harry - assets don't have to be bricks and mortar, things such as intellectual property rights, and patents etc can be very valuable. However, for an agent if they earn x and it goes through their company and they take it all as a wage then the company has no asset. Goodwill is difficult to value - that would be say the brand coca cola, it's recognised all over the world etc. For a footballer that would be complex. For an agent with say 10 premier league footballers I believe the assets would be No 2 and 4 is very difficult to estimate and I guess most companies will be very conservative Thanks. Very interesting to someone as ignorant as me about these things.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 26 Jan 18 1.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Aray
Not gonna lie - I did have a second take on this. I thought the potential for a conflict of interest with Salthouse had a ring of truth. There is a potential conflict - Parish should have answered the question "But asked on Thursday if his shares in Dirtybird represented a conflict of interest when Salthouse has been involved in at least eight Crystal Palace transfers since 2015, Parish declined to comment." How can there be a conflict of interest as the two are small shareholders and neither have any say in the running of the company. I wouldn't mind betting that Steve Parish has investments in loads of companies and probably doesn't have a clue who his co-shareholders are in them
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.